Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Eviction Order Under Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 — Children Cannot Invoke Act Against Parent. The Act is designed for maintenance and welfare of senior citizens, not for children to seek eviction of their father.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, Mrs. Nayana Sudhir Shah (wife of respondent No.1) and their major children, filed a Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 31st January 2017 passed by the Appellate Authority under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007. The Appellate Authority had dismissed their appeal under Section 16 of the Act, confirming the order dated 12th August 2016 passed by the Tribunal for Maintenance of Parents and Senior Citizens, Mumbai City. The petitioners sought eviction of respondent No.1 (husband/father) from the shared household. The High Court held that the Act is designed for the maintenance and welfare of senior citizens, not for children to seek eviction of their parent. The petitioners, being the wife and major children, cannot invoke the provisions of the Act against the respondent, who is a senior citizen. The court noted that the obligation under Section 4 of the Act is on children to maintain their parents, and Section 23 provides for eviction of a senior citizen only in certain circumstances, but does not permit children to seek eviction of their parent. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the petition, upholding the orders of the authorities below.

Headnote

A) Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 - Scope and Object - Children as Applicants - The Act is intended for the maintenance and welfare of parents and senior citizens, not for children to seek eviction of their parent. The petitioners, being the wife and major children of the respondent, cannot invoke the provisions of the Act against the respondent, who is a senior citizen. (Paras 3-5)

B) Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 - Section 4 - Obligation of Children to Maintain Parents - The obligation under Section 4 is on children to maintain their parents, not on parents to maintain children. The petitioners, being major children, cannot seek maintenance or eviction under the Act. (Para 4)

C) Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 - Section 23 - Eviction of Senior Citizen - Section 23 provides for eviction of a senior citizen from his property only in certain circumstances, but the Act does not permit children to seek eviction of their parent. (Para 5)

D) Constitutional Law - Article 227 - Supervisory Jurisdiction - The High Court declined to interfere with the orders of the authorities below, which had dismissed the petitioners' application, as the petitioners had no locus standi under the Act. (Para 6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioners (wife and major children) can maintain an application under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 seeking eviction of the respondent (husband/father) from the shared household.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court dismissed the Writ Petition, holding that the petitioners cannot invoke the provisions of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 against the respondent, who is a senior citizen. The orders of the authorities below were upheld.

Law Points

  • Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act
  • 2007
  • Section 4
  • Section 16
  • Section 23
  • Article 227 of the Constitution of India
  • Eviction
  • Senior Citizens
  • Children as applicants
  • Scope of Act
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2020 LawText (BOM) (05) 25

WRIT PETITION NO. 7982 OF 2018

2020-05-19

A. S. GADKARI, J.

Mr. P. K. Dhakephalkar, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. Vishal Narichania, Mr. Chinmaya Acharya a/w Jaswandi Khatu i/by Mr. Susmit S. Phatale for the Petitioners; Mr. Shashank Thatte a/w Mr. Ranjit Agashe i/by Mr. Pankaj R. Thatte for the Respondent No.1; Ms. M.S. Bane, AGP for the Respondent Nos.2 and 3-State.

Mrs. Nayana Sudhir Shah, Mr. Samkit Sudhir Shah, Miss Shraddha Sudhir Shah

Mr. Sudhir Premji Shah, Collector of Mumbai, Deputy Collector & Presiding Officer, Tribunal for Maintenance of Parents and Senior Citizens

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging orders under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007.

Remedy Sought

The petitioners sought to quash the order of the Appellate Authority dismissing their appeal and to evict respondent No.1 from the shared household.

Filing Reason

The petitioners were aggrieved by the order of the Appellate Authority under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007, which dismissed their appeal against the order of the Tribunal.

Previous Decisions

The Tribunal for Maintenance of Parents and Senior Citizens, Mumbai City, passed an order on 12th August 2016, which was confirmed by the Appellate Authority on 31st January 2017.

Issues

Whether the petitioners (wife and major children) can maintain an application under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 seeking eviction of the respondent (husband/father) from the shared household.

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioners argued that they are entitled to seek eviction of the respondent under the Act. The respondent contended that the Act is for the benefit of senior citizens and cannot be used by children against their parent.

Ratio Decidendi

The Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 is intended for the maintenance and welfare of parents and senior citizens. Children, including major children, cannot invoke the Act to seek eviction of their parent. The obligation under Section 4 is on children to maintain their parents, not vice versa.

Judgment Excerpts

The present Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, takes an exception to the Order dated 31st January, 2017 passed by the Maintenance Officer and Assistant Commissioner Social Welfare, Mumbai City (Appellate Authority) under The Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007... The Petitioner No.1 is the wife of the Respondent No.1. The Petitioner Nos. 2 and 3 are the major children of the Petitioner No.1 and the Respondent No.1.

Procedural History

The petitioners filed an application before the Tribunal for Maintenance of Parents and Senior Citizens, Mumbai City, which was dismissed on 12th August 2016. They appealed to the Appellate Authority under Section 16 of the Act, which dismissed the appeal on 31st January 2017. The petitioners then filed the present Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.

Acts & Sections

  • Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007: Section 4, Section 16, Section 23
  • Constitution of India: Article 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Grants Interim Relief Under Section 9 of Arbitration Act in Support of LMAA Arbitration — Respondent Directed to Furnish Bank Guarantee for Admitted Demurrage Liability. The court held that where liability is admitted and payment ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Eviction Order Under Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 — Children Cannot Invoke Act Against Parent. The Act is designed for maintenance and welfare of senior citizens, ...