Bombay High Court Allows Peaceful Protest in Maharashtra Police Act Case — Prohibitory Order Quashed. Right to peaceful demonstration upheld; order under Section 37(1)(3) of Maharashtra Police Act, 1951 set aside for lack of material showing threat to public order.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Iftekhar Zakee Shaikh, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 21.01.2020 passed by the Police Inspector, City Police Station, Majalgaon, purportedly under Section 149 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and an order dated 31.01.2020 passed by the Additional District Magistrate, Beed, under Section 37(1)(3) of the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951. The petitioner sought permission to hold peaceful demonstrations and agitations at the old Idgah Maidan in Majalgaon, District Beed, between 6 pm to 10 pm daily for an indefinite period. The police had refused permission citing the prohibitory order. The State, through the learned A.P.P., submitted that the authorities did not intend to prohibit the petitioner and companions from sitting for the agitation and that police would provide necessary protection. The court examined the order dated 31.01.2020 and found that it was based on a letter from the District Superintendent of Police dated 30.01.2020, but the order itself did not disclose any material to show that the proposed agitation would cause a threat to public order. The court held that the order under Section 37(1)(3) of the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951 could not have been issued to prevent peaceful agitation. Consequently, the court quashed and set aside both the order dated 31.01.2020 passed by the Additional District Magistrate and the order dated 21.01.2020 passed by the Police Inspector. The court directed the respondents to allow the petitioner and companions to hold peaceful demonstrations and agitations at the old Idgah Maidan, subject to maintaining law and order and giving prior notice to the police. The petition was disposed of accordingly.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Right to Peaceful Protest - Section 37(1)(3) Maharashtra Police Act, 1951 - Prohibitory Order - The court considered whether a prohibitory order under Section 37(1)(3) of the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951 could be issued to prevent peaceful agitation. The court held that such an order cannot be issued to prevent peaceful protest without material showing threat to public order. (Paras 3-5)

B) Criminal Procedure Code - Section 149 CrPC - Police Order - The court noted that the police order dated 21.01.2020 was purportedly under Section 149 CrPC but the real basis was the order under Section 37(1)(3) of the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951. The court set aside both orders. (Paras 2, 5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the order issued under Section 37(1)(3) of the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951 prohibiting the petitioner and companions from holding peaceful demonstrations at Idgah Maidan was valid.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court quashed and set aside the order dated 31.01.2020 passed by the Additional District Magistrate, Beed under Section 37(1)(3) of the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951 and the order dated 21.01.2020 passed by the Police Inspector, City Police Station, Majalgaon. The respondents were directed to allow the petitioner and companions to hold peaceful demonstrations and agitations at the old Idgah Maidan, subject to maintaining law and order and giving prior notice to the police.

Law Points

  • Right to peaceful protest
  • Section 37(1)(3) Maharashtra Police Act
  • 1951
  • Section 149 CrPC
  • Prohibitory orders
  • Public order
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2020 LawText (BOM) (02) 4

Criminal Writ Petition No. 223 of 2020

2020-02-13

T.V. Nalawade, M.G. Sewlikar

Mr. Salunke Sudarshan J. for the Petitioner, Mr. R.V. Dasalkar, A.P.P. for the respondent-State

Iftekhar Zakee Shaikh

The State of Maharashtra and Others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal writ petition challenging prohibitory orders preventing peaceful demonstration.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of orders dated 21.01.2020 and 31.01.2020, and direction to allow peaceful demonstrations at Idgah Maidan.

Filing Reason

Police refused permission for peaceful agitation based on prohibitory orders.

Previous Decisions

Police Inspector order dated 21.01.2020 under Section 149 CrPC; Additional District Magistrate order dated 31.01.2020 under Section 37(1)(3) of Maharashtra Police Act.

Issues

Whether the order under Section 37(1)(3) of Maharashtra Police Act, 1951 could be issued to prevent peaceful agitation.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner sought to hold peaceful demonstrations at Idgah Maidan. State submitted that authorities do not intend to prohibit the agitation and will provide protection.

Ratio Decidendi

An order under Section 37(1)(3) of the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951 cannot be issued to prevent peaceful agitation without material showing a threat to public order.

Judgment Excerpts

The order shows that the District Superintendent of Police had informed by letter dated 30.01.2020 to the Additional District Magistrate about the proposed agitation. The order does not disclose any material to show that the proposed agitation would cause any threat to public order. In view of this submission, the only question which remains to be decided is whether the aforesaid order issued under Section 37(1)(3) of Maharashtra Police Act, 1951 could have been issued to prevent such agitation.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 223 of 2020 before the Bombay High Court challenging the police order dated 21.01.2020 and the Additional District Magistrate order dated 31.01.2020. The court heard both sides and disposed of the petition on 13.02.2020.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Police Act, 1951: Section 37(1)(3)
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: Section 149
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging PF Liability for Gymnasium Centre. Fitness centre providing health services falls under 'Expert Service' category under Section 1(3)(b) of the Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Peaceful Protest in Maharashtra Police Act Case — Prohibitory Order Quashed. Right to peaceful demonstration upheld; order under Section 37(1)(3) of Maharashtra Police Act, 1951 set aside for lack of material showing threat...