Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Petition Challenging Election of Managing Committee of Co-operative Society. Petitioner failed to establish that the election process was vitiated by any illegality or irregularity warranting interference under Article 226 of the Constitution.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: GOA
  • 7
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Elvis Olegario Gomes, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the election of the managing committee of the South Goa Mechanized Boat Owners, Co-operative and Marketing Society Ltd. (respondent no.16). The petitioner alleged that the election process was vitiated by irregularities, including improper voter list and lack of proper notice. The respondents, including the State of Goa and the Registrar of Co-operative Societies, opposed the petition, contending that the election was conducted in accordance with the bye-laws and the Co-operative Societies Act, 1904. The court, after hearing the parties, held that the petitioner failed to establish any illegality or irregularity in the election process. The court noted that the petitioner had an alternative remedy under the Co-operative Societies Act but chose to approach the High Court. On merits, the court found that the election was conducted fairly and in compliance with the applicable rules. The petition was dismissed with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Co-operative Law - Election of Managing Committee - Challenge to Election Process - The petitioner challenged the election of the managing committee of a co-operative society on grounds of alleged irregularities. The court held that the election process was conducted in accordance with the bye-laws and the Co-operative Societies Act, 1904, and no material irregularity was established. The petition was dismissed. (Paras 1-10)

B) Constitutional Law - Writ Jurisdiction - Alternative Remedy - The court noted that the petitioner had an alternative remedy under the Co-operative Societies Act, 1904, but chose to approach the High Court directly. The court held that even on merits, the petition failed. (Paras 1-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the election of the managing committee of the respondent no.16 society was vitiated by any illegality or irregularity, and whether the High Court should interfere under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is dismissed. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Election of managing committee of co-operative society
  • challenge to election process
  • jurisdiction of High Court under Article 226
  • alternative remedy under Co-operative Societies Act
  • 1904
  • scope of judicial review in election matters
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2020 LawText (BOM) (01) 128

WRIT PETITION NO.873 OF 2019

2020-01-31

M. S. Sonak, Smt. M.S. Jawalkar

2020:BHC-GOA:263-DB

Mr. Tanmai Gawas, Mr. Pravin Faldessai, Mr. Shivan Dessai

Shri. Elvis Olegario Gomes

State of Goa, Department of Co-operation, Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Mr. Miguel Jose Rodrigues, Mr. Joaquim Fernandes, Mr. Deepak A. Naik Raikar, Mr. Antonio Rodrigues, Mr. Shivanand Lotlikar, Mr. Cipriano Cardono, Mr. Lislie Cardozo, Mr. Jose Roque Dourado, Mr. Dilip N. Gawas, Mr. John Barreto, Mr. Sanju Bhandari, Mr. Antonio Rodrigues, South Goa Mechanized Boat Owners, Co-operative and Marketing Society Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging election of managing committee of a co-operative society.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought to quash the election of the managing committee of respondent no.16 society.

Filing Reason

Petitioner alleged irregularities in the election process.

Issues

Whether the election of the managing committee was vitiated by illegality or irregularity. Whether the High Court should interfere under Article 226.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the election process was irregular and not in accordance with bye-laws. Respondents contended that the election was conducted fairly and in compliance with the Act and bye-laws.

Ratio Decidendi

The election of the managing committee of a co-operative society, if conducted in accordance with the bye-laws and the Co-operative Societies Act, cannot be interfered with under Article 226 unless there is a clear illegality or irregularity. The petitioner failed to establish any such illegality.

Judgment Excerpts

Heard Mr. Tanmai Gawas, the learned Advocate for the petitioner. The petition is dismissed. No order as to costs.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 challenging the election of the managing committee. The respondents filed their replies. The court heard the parties and dismissed the petition.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
  • Goa Co-operative Societies Act, 1904:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Disposes Writ Petition Directing Police to Complete Enquiry into Complaint for Recovery of Two-Wheeler. Court holds that in writ jurisdiction under Article 226, direction can be given to police authorities to expeditiously complete ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Petition Challenging Election of Managing Committee of Co-operative Society. Petitioner failed to establish that the election process was vitiated by any illegality or irregularity warranting interference under Arti...