Bombay High Court Allows Wife's Maintenance Petition and Husband's Divorce Petition in Matrimonial Dispute. Court Orders DNA Test for Paternity and Grants Visitation Rights to Father.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR
  • 5
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The judgment arises from three connected criminal writ petitions filed by the wife (Aruna Shukla) and the husband (Omprakash Shukla) and his family members, arising out of matrimonial disputes. The wife filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 372 of 2019 challenging the order of the Family Court, Nagpur dated 30.01.2019, which dismissed her application for maintenance under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) for herself and her minor son. The husband and his family members filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 707 of 2018 and Criminal Writ Petition No. 718 of 2018 challenging the order of the Family Court dated 30.01.2019, which dismissed their application for divorce and custody of the child. The parties were married on 08.05.2005 and a son was born on 22.10.2006. The wife alleged cruelty and dowry demands, while the husband alleged that the wife had an adulterous relationship and that the child was not born from the wedlock. The Family Court had dismissed the wife's maintenance application on the ground that she had not proved her income and that the husband had no obligation to maintain her as she was living separately without sufficient reason. The Family Court also dismissed the husband's divorce petition on the ground that cruelty was not proved. The High Court considered the evidence and arguments. The court held that the wife was entitled to maintenance as the husband failed to prove adultery or that the child was not born from the wedlock. The court set aside the Family Court's order and granted maintenance of Rs. 3000 per month to the wife and Rs. 2000 per month to the child from the date of application. The court also allowed the husband's divorce petition on the ground of cruelty, as the wife had filed false criminal complaints and made unfounded allegations. The court ordered a DNA test to determine paternity of the child. The court granted custody of the child to the mother with visitation rights to the father, allowing him to meet the child twice a month and during summer vacations. The court directed that the DNA test be conducted at the Government Medical College and Hospital, Nagpur, and that the husband bear the cost. The court also directed that the husband pay the maintenance arrears within three months.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Maintenance - Section 125 CrPC - Denial of Maintenance - Wife and child entitled to maintenance as husband failed to prove wife's adultery or that child was not born from the wedlock - Family Court's order denying maintenance set aside - Held that wife is entitled to maintenance of Rs. 3000 per month and child to Rs. 2000 per month from date of application (Paras 10-15).

B) Family Law - Divorce - Cruelty - Husband entitled to divorce on ground of cruelty as wife filed false criminal complaints and made unfounded allegations - Marriage dissolved under Section 13(1)(i-a) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (Paras 16-20).

C) Evidence - DNA Test - Paternity - DNA test ordered to determine paternity of child born during wedlock - Husband's application for DNA test allowed as it is in the interest of justice and child's welfare (Paras 21-25).

D) Family Law - Custody and Visitation - Minor Child - Custody granted to mother with visitation rights to father - Father entitled to meet child twice a month and during summer vacations - Held that welfare of child is paramount (Paras 26-30).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Family Court was justified in denying maintenance to the wife and child; whether the husband is entitled to divorce on ground of cruelty; whether DNA test should be ordered to determine paternity; what visitation rights should be granted to the husband.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court allowed the wife's petition (WP 372/2019) setting aside the Family Court order and granting maintenance of Rs. 3000 per month to wife and Rs. 2000 per month to child from date of application. The court allowed the husband's petitions (WP 707/2018 and WP 718/2018) partly: granted divorce on ground of cruelty, ordered DNA test for paternity, granted custody to mother with visitation rights to father (twice a month and summer vacations). Husband to pay maintenance arrears within three months.

Law Points

  • Maintenance under Section 125 CrPC
  • DNA test for paternity
  • visitation rights
  • interim maintenance
  • divorce on ground of cruelty
  • custody of minor child
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2021 LawText (BOM) (07) 62

Criminal Writ Petition No. 372 of 2019, Criminal Writ Petition No. 707 of 2018, Criminal Writ Petition No. 718 of 2018

2021-07-27

Manish Pitale, J.

Shri. C. A. Joshi, Advocate for Petitioner (in WP 372/2019) and for Respondent (in WP 707/2018 and WP 718/2018); Shri. A. S. Joshi, Advocate for Respondent (in WP 372/2019) and for Petitioners (in WP 707/2018 and WP 718/2018)

Sau. Aruna W/o. Omprakash Shukla (in WP 372/2019); Omprakash Devanand Shukla & Ors. (in WP 707/2018 and WP 718/2018)

Omprakash S/o. Devanand Shukla (in WP 372/2019); Sau. Aruna W/o. Omprakash Shukla (in WP 707/2018 and WP 718/2018)

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal writ petitions challenging orders of Family Court regarding maintenance, divorce, and custody.

Remedy Sought

Wife sought maintenance under Section 125 CrPC; husband sought divorce and custody of child.

Filing Reason

Matrimonial disputes including allegations of cruelty, adultery, and paternity of child.

Previous Decisions

Family Court, Nagpur dismissed wife's maintenance application and husband's divorce petition on 30.01.2019.

Issues

Whether the Family Court was justified in denying maintenance to the wife and child under Section 125 CrPC? Whether the husband is entitled to divorce on the ground of cruelty under Section 13(1)(i-a) of the Hindu Marriage Act? Whether a DNA test should be ordered to determine paternity of the child born during wedlock? What visitation rights should be granted to the husband regarding the minor child?

Submissions/Arguments

Wife argued that she was entitled to maintenance as she was unable to maintain herself and the child, and the husband had sufficient means. Husband argued that the wife was living in adultery and the child was not born from the wedlock, and that the wife had subjected him to cruelty by filing false complaints. Husband sought divorce on ground of cruelty and custody of the child. Wife opposed divorce and sought maintenance and custody.

Ratio Decidendi

A wife is entitled to maintenance under Section 125 CrPC unless the husband proves she is living in adultery or has sufficient means. A husband can seek divorce on ground of cruelty if the wife files false criminal complaints. DNA test can be ordered to determine paternity in the interest of justice. Custody of minor child should be with mother, but father is entitled to visitation rights.

Judgment Excerpts

The Family Court erred in denying maintenance to the wife and child. The husband has proved cruelty on the part of the wife. DNA test is necessary to determine the paternity of the child. The welfare of the child is paramount and custody should be with the mother.

Procedural History

The wife filed an application for maintenance under Section 125 CrPC before the Family Court, Nagpur. The husband filed a petition for divorce and custody. The Family Court dismissed both applications on 30.01.2019. Aggrieved, the wife filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 372 of 2019, and the husband and his family members filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 707 of 2018 and Criminal Writ Petition No. 718 of 2018 before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench. The High Court heard all three petitions together and delivered judgment on 27.07.2021.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 125
  • Hindu Marriage Act, 1955: 13(1)(i-a)
  • Indian Evidence Act, 1872: 112
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Suit Based on Adverse Possession — Overrules Earlier View That Adverse Possession Can Only Be Used as Shield. Plaintiff Who Has Perfected Title by Adverse Possession Can Sue for Declaration and Protection or Recovery of Possess...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay at Goa Partially Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Compensation Reduced from Rs.26/ to Rs.20/ per sqm for Paddy Field Acquired for Konkan Railway. Sale Deed of Small Portion of Same Land Held Comparable but Subject to De...