Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Unreliable Complainant Testimony. Conviction under Section 307 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 19
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case pertains to an appeal against conviction under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The appellant, Chandrakant Bhikaji Walawalkar, along with a co-accused (since deceased), was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Solapur, for attempting to murder the complainant by strangulation. The prosecution alleged that on 10th August 1995, the complainant and the accused were on a pleasure trip. After lunch, while returning, the accused alighted to answer nature's call, and upon return, the co-accused attempted to strangulate the complainant with a wire while the appellant caught hold of his hands. The complainant fell unconscious and regained consciousness after four hours, then went to a hotel and narrated the incident. The trial court convicted both accused. On appeal, the High Court examined the evidence, particularly the testimony of the complainant (PW-8). The court found several contradictions and improvements in his testimony, including discrepancies regarding the time of the incident, the manner of strangulation, and the presence of others. The court noted that the complainant's version was not corroborated by independent witnesses and that the medical evidence did not support the alleged strangulation. The court concluded that the prosecution had not proved its case beyond reasonable doubt and allowed the appeal, setting aside the conviction and acquitting the appellant.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Attempt to Murder - Section 307 Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Unreliable Testimony - The appellant was convicted for attempt to murder based on the sole testimony of the complainant, which was found to be contradictory and unreliable. The court held that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, and the appellant was entitled to acquittal. (Paras 1-9)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the conviction of the appellant under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 is sustainable based on the evidence on record.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal allowed. Conviction and sentence set aside. Appellant acquitted of the charge under Section 307 IPC. Fine, if paid, to be refunded.

Law Points

  • Section 307 IPC
  • Attempt to murder
  • Unreliable testimony
  • Benefit of doubt
  • Acquittal
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2021 LawText (BOM) (01) 56

Criminal Appeal No. 240 of 1998

2021-01-29

Sandeep K. Shinde

2021:BHC-AS:895

Ms. Devyani Kulkarni (for appellant), Mrs. Sharmila Kaushik (APP for State)

Chandrakant Bhikaji Walawalkar

The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for attempt to murder.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought acquittal by setting aside the conviction and sentence under Section 307 IPC.

Filing Reason

Appellant was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Solapur, for attempting to murder the complainant.

Previous Decisions

Sessions Judge, Solapur, convicted the appellant and co-accused under Section 307 IPC and sentenced them to 7 years rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs.2,000/- each.

Issues

Whether the conviction under Section 307 IPC is sustainable based on the evidence on record.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the testimony of the complainant was unreliable and contradictory. State argued that the evidence was sufficient to sustain the conviction.

Ratio Decidendi

The prosecution must prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The testimony of the complainant, being the sole basis for conviction, was found to be unreliable and contradictory, and therefore the appellant is entitled to acquittal.

Judgment Excerpts

It is unfolded in the evidence that, accused and the complainant had been to Solapur on the pleasure trip in Vehicle MH-09/G-863. The learned Sessions Judge, Solapur by judgment and order dated 30th December, 1997 passed in Sessions Case No. 87 of 1997 convicted the appellant and the deceased co-accused under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 7 years and fine of Rs.2,000/- each.

Procedural History

The appellant and co-accused were convicted by the Sessions Judge, Solapur on 30th December 1997. The appellant filed Criminal Appeal No. 240 of 1998 before the Bombay High Court. During the pendency of the appeal, the co-accused died, and the appeal abated as against him. The High Court heard the appeal and delivered judgment on 29th January 2021.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 307
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Unreliable Complainant Testimony. Conviction under Section 307 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Sets Aside Order Returning Plaint in Commercial Suit Due to Non-Compliance with Pre-Institution Mediation Under Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015. The Court Held that the Suit, which Sought Interim Injunction and Mandat...