Bombay High Court Allows Transfer of Hindu Marriage Petition from Pune to Buldhana on Wife's Application Under Section 24 CPC — Convenience of Wife and Avoidance of Multiplicity of Proceedings Considered. The Court transferred the husband's restitution of conjugal rights petition to the wife's place of residence to avoid hardship and ensure both matrimonial proceedings are heard together.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner-wife filed an application under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking transfer of Hindu Marriage Petition No. A/1175/2022 filed by the respondent-husband for restitution of conjugal rights from the Family Court at Pune to the Family Court at Buldhana. The marriage was solemnized on 11 April 2019 at Akola as per Hindu rites. After marriage, the couple stayed at Susgaon, Pune, and later shifted to Tathawade. The wife alleged cruelty by the husband between 2019 and 2021, and on 21 September 2021, she left the matrimonial home and went to her parents' place at Buldhana. In June 2022, the husband filed the petition for restitution of conjugal rights at Pune, to which the wife filed a reply. In August 2022, the wife filed divorce proceedings against the husband at Buldhana. The wife, though qualified, was unemployed and dependent on her parents. She contended that the distance of about 400 kms between Buldhana and Pune would cause hardship and inconvenience, and she had no means to travel or stay at Pune. The husband was served but did not appear. The Court noted that the stage of proceedings at Pune was for framing of issues, and at Buldhana for filing of reply. Allowing the transfer, the Court held that it would be convenient for the wife and avoid multiplicity of proceedings, as both matters could be heard together at Buldhana. The Court directed the transfer of the petition from Family Court, Pune to Family Court, Buldhana, and requested the Family Court, Buldhana to expedite the hearing.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Transfer of Proceedings - Section 24 CPC - Convenience of Wife - The wife sought transfer of a Hindu Marriage Petition for restitution of conjugal rights from Family Court, Pune to Family Court, Buldhana. The wife was residing with her parents at Buldhana, had no independent income, and the distance between Buldhana and Pune was about 400 kms. The husband did not appear despite service. The Court allowed the transfer, holding that it would be convenient for the wife and avoid multiplicity of proceedings, as the wife had already filed divorce proceedings at Buldhana. (Paras 1-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Hindu Marriage Petition for restitution of conjugal rights pending before the Family Court at Pune should be transferred to the Family Court at Buldhana on the application of the wife under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Court allowed the application and directed the transfer of Hindu Marriage Petition No. A/1175/2022 from the Family Court at Pune to the Family Court at Buldhana. The Family Court at Buldhana was requested to expedite the hearing.

Law Points

  • Transfer of proceedings under Section 24 CPC
  • convenience of wife
  • avoidance of multiplicity of proceedings
  • Hindu Marriage Act
  • 1955
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (BOM) (11) 98

MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION (TR.) NO. 628 OF 2022

2022-11-18

Abhay Ahuja, J

Mr. A.P. Wachasundar for the Petitioner

Mrinmayee W/o Yashodeep Khadse

Yashodeep S/o Sahebrao Khadse

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Application for transfer of Hindu Marriage Petition from Family Court, Pune to Family Court, Buldhana under Section 24 CPC.

Remedy Sought

Transfer of Hindu Marriage Petition No. A/1175/2022 filed by the husband for restitution of conjugal rights from Family Court, Pune to Family Court, Buldhana.

Filing Reason

The wife alleged cruelty by the husband and left the matrimonial home; she filed divorce proceedings at Buldhana and sought transfer of the husband's petition to avoid hardship and multiplicity of proceedings.

Issues

Whether the Hindu Marriage Petition for restitution of conjugal rights pending at Pune should be transferred to Buldhana under Section 24 CPC.

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioner-wife submitted that she is unemployed, dependent on her parents, and the distance of 400 kms between Buldhana and Pune causes hardship and inconvenience. The petitioner-wife submitted that she has no means to travel or stay at Pune, and transfer would avoid multiplicity of proceedings as she has already filed divorce proceedings at Buldhana. The respondent-husband did not appear despite service.

Ratio Decidendi

Under Section 24 CPC, the court may transfer proceedings if it is expedient for the ends of justice. The convenience of the wife, who is dependent on her parents and has no independent income, and the avoidance of multiplicity of proceedings, are relevant considerations for transfer.

Judgment Excerpts

This is an application filed by the Petitioner-Wife under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 seeking transfer of Hindu Marriage Petition No.A/1175/2022, filed by the Respondent-Husband in the Family Court at Pune to the Family Court at Buldhana. He submits that the distance between Buldhana and Pune is about 400 kms and it would not only be inconvenient for her to travel up and down from Buldhana to Pune every time the matter is listed in the Court at Pune, but also cause undue hardship. In view of the above, the application is allowed and the proceedings in Hindu Marriage Petition No.A/1175/2022 pending before the Family Court at Pune are directed to be transferred to the Family Court at Buldhana.

Procedural History

The wife filed an application under Section 24 CPC on an unspecified date. The husband was served but did not appear. The Court granted stay on 21.10.2022. The application was heard and allowed on 18.11.2022.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Section 24
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Employer Appeals in Provident Fund Damages Case — Upholds Levy of Damages Under Section 14B of Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 for Delayed Remittance. Mens Rea Not Essential for Le...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Furlough Petition as Infructuous After Prisoner's Release. Petitioner completed 14 years of actual imprisonment and was released from prison, rendering the petition infructuous.