Bombay High Court Allows Transfer of Suit for Declaration of Marriage as Null and Void from Dhamangaon to Wardha on Grounds of Wife's Convenience and Pending Proceedings at Wardha. The court held that the balance of convenience lies in favour of the wife, who resides in Wardha and has pending proceedings under the Domestic Violence Act, 2005 there, and directed transfer of the suit under Section 24 CPC.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicant-wife filed an application under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 seeking transfer of Regular Civil Suit No.9 of 2022 from the Court of Civil Judge Junior Division at Dhamangaon to the Court of Civil Judge Junior Division at Wardha. The suit was filed by the respondent-husband for a declaration that the marriage between the parties was null and void under Section 34 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963. The marriage was solemnized on 22.05.2013 as per Muslim rites. After the marriage, the wife alleged ill-treatment by the husband and his family. A daughter was born. In 2019, following an altercation, the wife left the matrimonial home and went to Wardha with her daughter. She filed proceedings under the Domestic Violence Act, 2005 before the 5th Judicial Magistrate First Class at Wardha on 20.10.2021, which was pending with interim maintenance orders in her favour. She also filed a complaint under Sections 504 and 506 IPC on 20.04.2019. The wife contended that she resides in Wardha, has a minor daughter, and has no independent source of income, making it difficult to travel to Dhamangaon for the suit. The husband opposed the transfer, arguing that the suit was filed at Dhamangaon where the marriage was solemnized and where he resides. The court considered the convenience of the wife, the pendency of other proceedings at Wardha, and the balance of convenience. The court held that the wife's convenience should be given precedence, especially since she has a minor daughter and no independent income. The court also noted that the husband is a retired person and can travel to Wardha. The court allowed the transfer application, directing the transfer of the suit from Dhamangaon to Wardha, and requested the trial court at Wardha to expedite the hearing.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Transfer of Suit - Section 24 CPC - Convenience of Parties - Wife sought transfer of husband's suit for declaration of marriage as null and void from Dhamangaon to Wardha - Court held that since the wife resides in Wardha, has a minor daughter, and has pending proceedings under the Domestic Violence Act, 2005 at Wardha, the balance of convenience lies in transferring the suit to Wardha - Held that transfer is necessary to avoid multiplicity of proceedings and hardship to the wife (Paras 1-6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the suit for declaration of marriage as null and void filed by the husband at Dhamangaon should be transferred to Wardha for the convenience of the wife, given that she resides in Wardha and has pending proceedings there.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the application and directed the transfer of Regular Civil Suit No.9 of 2022 from the Court of Civil Judge Junior Division at Dhamangaon to the Court of Civil Judge Junior Division at Wardha. The trial court at Wardha was requested to expedite the hearing.

Law Points

  • Transfer of suit
  • convenience of parties
  • pending proceedings at transferee court
  • balance of convenience
  • Section 24 CPC
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (BOM) (11) 96

MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION (TR) NO. 396 OF 2022

2022-11-14

Abhay Ahuja

Ms M. A. Syed for the Applicant, Mr M. Ateeque for the Respondent

Yasmeen Anjum W/o Rashid Khan

Rashid Khan S/o Mohammad Rajjak

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil miscellaneous application for transfer of suit from one civil court to another.

Remedy Sought

Transfer of Regular Civil Suit No.9 of 2022 from the Court of Civil Judge Junior Division at Dhamangaon to the Court of Civil Judge Junior Division at Wardha.

Filing Reason

The applicant-wife sought transfer on grounds of her residence at Wardha, pendency of other proceedings at Wardha, and difficulty in traveling to Dhamangaon due to lack of income and having a minor daughter.

Issues

Whether the suit for declaration of marriage as null and void should be transferred from Dhamangaon to Wardha for the convenience of the wife.

Submissions/Arguments

Applicant-wife submitted that she resides in Wardha with her minor daughter, has no independent income, and has pending proceedings under the Domestic Violence Act, 2005 and a criminal complaint at Wardha, making it difficult to attend court at Dhamangaon. Respondent-husband opposed the transfer, arguing that the suit was filed at Dhamangaon where the marriage was solemnized and where he resides.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the convenience of the wife, who resides in Wardha with a minor daughter and has pending proceedings there, should be given precedence over the husband's choice of forum. The balance of convenience lies in transferring the suit to Wardha to avoid multiplicity of proceedings and hardship to the wife.

Judgment Excerpts

This is an application seeking transfer of Regular Civil Suit No.9 of 2022 filed by the Respondent-husband for declaration of the marriage as null and void under Section 34 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 before the Court of the Civil Judge Junior Division at Dhamagaon to the Court of Civil Judge Junior Division at Wardha. The Applicant continued to stay with her husband under the bona fide impression that the behaviour of the husband and his family members towards her will change. The court held that the convenience of the wife should be given precedence, especially since she has a minor daughter and no independent income.

Procedural History

The applicant-wife filed an application under Section 24 CPC for transfer of the suit filed by the husband. The suit was pending before the Civil Judge Junior Division at Dhamangaon. The wife had also filed proceedings under the Domestic Violence Act, 2005 and a criminal complaint at Wardha. The court heard both parties and allowed the transfer.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Section 24
  • Specific Relief Act, 1963: Section 34
  • Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005:
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: Sections 504, 506
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Declaration of Ownership and Injunction in Flat Dispute — Plaintiff Fails to Establish Title as Flat Was Allotted to Original Owner Under Development Agreement.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellants for Murder and Hurt in Land Dispute — Common Intention Established. Appellants convicted under Sections 302 and 324 read with Section 34 IPC for fatal assault on deceased with sticks and axes.