Bombay High Court Allows Transfer of Marriage Petition from Sindhudurg to Amravati Under Section 24 CPC — Wife's Convenience and Child's Medical Needs Considered. The court held that the balance of convenience favors the wife, who resides in Amravati with a premature infant requiring medical attention, and the husband, working in Bangalore, can travel to Amravati.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicant, Yashika, wife of Yagnesh Padwal, filed an application under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking transfer of Marriage Petition No.137/2022 pending before the Civil Judge Senior Division, Sindhudurg at Oros, to the Court of Civil Judge Senior Division at Amravati. The marriage was solemnized on 02.12.2019 in Pune. After marriage, the wife resided with her husband in Sindhudurg but alleged ill-treatment, physical and mental harassment, and demand for gold ornaments. She was forcefully dropped at her parents' home in Bhatkuli, Amravati during the lockdown. On 24.10.2020, she gave birth to a premature baby boy requiring regular medical attention. The husband filed a petition under Section 12(1)(a)(c) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, seeking nullity of marriage at Sindhudurg. The wife also filed a complaint with Bhatkuli Police Station. The court considered the wife's residence in Amravati, the minor child's medical needs, and the difficulty of traveling with an infant. The court allowed the transfer, noting that the husband works in Bangalore and can easily travel to Amravati, while the wife would face hardship traveling to Sindhudurg. The court directed the transfer of the petition to Amravati and requested the trial court to expedite the proceedings.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Transfer of Proceedings - Section 24 Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Convenience of Wife - The court allowed transfer of Marriage Petition No.137/2022 from Sindhudurg to Amravati, considering the wife's residence, the minor child's medical needs, and the wife's difficulty in traveling with a premature infant. Held that the balance of convenience lies in favor of the wife (Paras 1-8).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the marriage petition filed by the husband at Sindhudurg should be transferred to Amravati for the convenience of the wife, considering her residence and the medical needs of the minor child.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The application is allowed. Marriage Petition No.137/2022 pending before the Civil Judge Senior Division, Sindhudurg at Oros is transferred to the Court of Civil Judge Senior Division, Amravati. The trial court is requested to expedite the proceedings.

Law Points

  • Transfer of proceedings
  • convenience of wife
  • Section 24 CPC
  • Hindu Marriage Act
  • 1955
  • Section 12(1)(a)(c)
  • minor child's medical needs
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (BOM) (11) 95

MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION (TR) NO. 61 OF 2021

2022-11-11

Abhay Ahuja

Shri A. P. Thakare

Sau. Yashika W/o Yagnesh Padwal

Yagnesh S/o Vilas Padwal

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Transfer of marriage petition from Sindhudurg to Amravati under Section 24 CPC.

Remedy Sought

Transfer of Marriage Petition No.137/2022 from Sindhudurg to Amravati.

Filing Reason

Wife's residence in Amravati, minor child's medical needs, and difficulty in traveling to Sindhudurg.

Issues

Whether the marriage petition should be transferred from Sindhudurg to Amravati for the convenience of the wife.

Submissions/Arguments

Applicant-wife submitted that she resides in Amravati with her parents and a premature infant requiring medical attention, making travel to Sindhudurg difficult. Non-applicant-husband filed a petition for nullity of marriage at Sindhudurg, but he works in Bangalore and can travel to Amravati.

Ratio Decidendi

The balance of convenience lies in favor of the wife, who resides in Amravati with a premature infant requiring medical attention, and the husband, working in Bangalore, can easily travel to Amravati, whereas the wife would face hardship traveling to Sindhudurg.

Judgment Excerpts

This is an application filed under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (the “CPC”) by one Yashika w/o Yagnesh Padwal seeking to transfer the Marriage Petition No.137 of 2022... That on 24.10.2020, the Applicant-wife Yashika gave birth to a baby boy, who was born premature and is in need of regular medical attention and checkup. The balance of convenience lies in favor of the Applicant-wife.

Procedural History

The applicant filed MCA (TR) No.61/2021 under Section 24 CPC seeking transfer of Marriage Petition No.137/2022 from Sindhudurg to Amravati. The court heard the matter and passed the order on 11.11.2022.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Section 24
  • Hindu Marriage Act, 1955: Section 12(1)(a)(c)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Transfer of Marriage Petition from Sindhudurg to Amravati Under Section 24 CPC — Wife's Convenience and Child's Medical Needs Considered. The court held that the balance of convenience favors the wife, who resides in Amrava...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Common Intention. Conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish appellant's participation in the...