Bombay High Court Allows Compassionate Appointment Claim Despite Delay, Directs MCGM to Consider Petitioner's Application Afresh. The court held that compassionate appointment is not barred by limitation and the employer must consider the application on merits, but backwages are not payable for the period not worked.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Durga Ramesh Berdia, is the daughter of late Ramesh Berdia, who worked as a Motor Loader in the Solid Waste Management Department of the Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay (MCGM). Ramesh died on duty on December 29, 2001, leaving behind his ex-wife and two daughters, including Durga. Durga applied for a job on compassionate ground on March 15, 2002, and submitted the requisite documents. She was appointed vide order dated April 21, 2015, but was allotted to the E-Central Department, which she considered unsafe for girls. She requested a transfer to East Byculla, and her appointment was kept on hold. She visited the department on various occasions but her appointment was not confirmed. She filed a writ petition seeking confirmation of her appointment and backwages. The court noted that the application was made promptly after the death, but the employer delayed processing it. The court held that the petitioner is entitled to consideration for compassionate appointment and directed the MCGM to consider her application afresh and pass an appropriate order within four weeks. However, the court denied backwages as she did not actually work. The petition was disposed of accordingly.

Headnote

A) Compassionate Appointment - Delay and Laches - Entitlement Despite Delay - The court considered whether a writ petition filed after a long delay should be entertained for compassionate appointment. The court held that while delay and laches are relevant, the claim for compassionate appointment is not barred by limitation and the employer must consider the application on merits, especially when the application was made promptly after the death. (Paras 1-10)

B) Compassionate Appointment - Backwages - Not Entitled - The court held that the petitioner is not entitled to backwages for the period she did not actually work, as compassionate appointment is not a mode of recruitment but a relief to tide over the crisis. (Para 10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner is entitled to compassionate appointment and backwages despite the delay in approaching the court and the passage of time since the death of the employee.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court directed the MCGM to consider the petitioner's application for compassionate appointment afresh and pass an appropriate order within four weeks. The petitioner is not entitled to backwages. The petition is disposed of.

Law Points

  • Compassionate appointment
  • delay in seeking remedy
  • laches
  • limitation
  • writ jurisdiction
  • public employment
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (BOM) (09) 119

WRIT PETITION NO. 665 OF 2021

2022-09-23

DIPANKAR DATTA, CJ., M. S. KARNIK, J.

2022:BHC-AS:23178-DB

Mr. Satishkumar R. Soni, for Petitioner. Mrs. R.A. Salunkhe, AGP for Respondent No.1. Mr. S.N. Pillai a/w Mr. Santosh Parad for Respondents No. 2 to 5 – MCGM.

Durga Ramesh Berdia

State of Maharashtra and ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking compassionate appointment and backwages.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought a writ directing MCGM to confirm her appointment on compassionate ground and grant backwages.

Filing Reason

Petitioner's father died on duty; she applied for compassionate appointment in 2002, was appointed in 2015 but appointment kept on hold due to transfer request; she sought confirmation.

Issues

Whether the petitioner is entitled to compassionate appointment despite the delay in filing the writ petition? Whether the petitioner is entitled to backwages for the period she did not work?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that she applied promptly after her father's death and the employer delayed processing; she is entitled to appointment and backwages. Respondents argued that the petition suffers from delay and laches; the petitioner did not join duty and hence not entitled to backwages.

Ratio Decidendi

Compassionate appointment is not a mode of recruitment but a relief to tide over the crisis caused by the death of the employee. Delay in filing the writ petition does not bar the claim if the application was made promptly. Backwages are not payable for the period the applicant did not actually work.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner, Durga Ramesh Berdia has prayed for an appropriate writ or order or direction against the respondent no. 2, Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay, Mumbai to confirm Durga’s appointment on compassionate ground at the earliest and for grant of backwages. The petitioner is not entitled to backwages for the period she did not actually work.

Procedural History

The petitioner applied for compassionate appointment on March 15, 2002. She was appointed on April 21, 2015, but the appointment was kept on hold due to her request for transfer. She filed the writ petition in 2021 seeking confirmation and backwages.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Compassionate Appointment Claim Despite Delay, Directs MCGM to Consider Petitioner's Application Afresh. The court held that compassionate appointment is not barred by limitation and the employer must consider the application...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim Case — Death of Passenger Due to Accidental Fall from Train. Claimants Entitled to Compensation Under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989 as Deceased Was a Bona Fide Passenger and Deat...