Bombay High Court Allows Quashing of FIR in Matrimonial Dispute Due to Settlement Between Husband and Wife. The court exercised inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to quash FIR for offences under Sections 498A, 313, 323, 504, 506 r/w 34 IPC after amicable settlement.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 5
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, who are the husband and his relatives, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of FIR No. 594/2020 registered at Pathardi Police Station, District Ahmednagar, for offences under Sections 498A, 313, 323, 504, 506 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and the consequent charge-sheet leading to R.C.C. No. 349/2022 pending before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Pathardi. The marriage between petitioner no. 6 (husband) and respondent no. 2 (informant wife) was solemnized on 19.11.2017. After the marriage, the wife alleged that she was treated well for only five to six days, after which her matrimonial family demanded Rs. 7 lakhs from her parents for securing a job for her husband. The wife filed the FIR alleging cruelty and demand of dowry. Subsequently, the parties amicably settled their disputes through mediation, and the wife expressed no objection to the quashing of the FIR. The court considered the submissions of the petitioners' counsel, the Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, and the counsel for respondent no. 2. The court noted that the dispute is essentially matrimonial in nature and the parties have settled their differences. The court held that since the wife has no objection and the settlement is genuine, continuing the criminal proceedings would be an abuse of the process of law. Therefore, the court allowed the petition and quashed the FIR and charge-sheet.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Quashing of FIR - Section 482 CrPC - Compromise in Matrimonial Disputes - The petitioners sought quashing of FIR for offences under Sections 498A, 313, 323, 504, 506 r/w 34 IPC on the ground of amicable settlement between the husband (petitioner no. 6) and the wife (respondent no. 2). The Court held that since the parties have settled the dispute and the wife has no objection to quashing, the FIR and charge-sheet deserve to be quashed to secure the ends of justice. (Paras 1-6)

B) Indian Penal Code - Matrimonial Cruelty - Sections 498A, 313, 323, 504, 506 r/w 34 IPC - Settlement - The informant wife alleged cruelty and demand of dowry. After mediation, the parties settled their differences and the wife consented to quashing. The Court, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC, quashed the FIR and charge-sheet, noting that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of process of law. (Paras 2-6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the FIR and charge-sheet for offences under Sections 498A, 313, 323, 504, 506 r/w 34 IPC can be quashed under Section 482 CrPC on the basis of a compromise between the parties.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. FIR vide Crime No. 594/2020 registered at Pathardi Police Station, Dist. Ahmednagar for offences under Sections 498A, 313, 323, 504, 506 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code and the Charge-sheet No. 280/2022 culminating into R.C.C. No. 349/2022 pending before the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Pathardi are quashed and set aside.

Law Points

  • Quashing of FIR
  • Section 482 CrPC
  • Compromise in matrimonial disputes
  • Non-compoundable offences
  • Settlement between husband and wife
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (BOM) (09) 34

Criminal Writ Petition No. 1428 of 2020

2022-09-07

Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi, Rajesh S. Patil

Mr. A. L. Kanade for petitioners, Mr. A. M. Phule APP for State, Mr. P. R. Nangare for respondent no. 2

Suresh Rangnath Mane, Asha Suresh Mane, Sadhana Dipak Gaikwad, Rangnath Eknath Mane, Laxmibai Rangnath Mane, Narayan Rangnath Mane

The State of Maharashtra, Shamal w/o Narayan Mane

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution read with Section 482 CrPC for quashing of FIR and charge-sheet.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought quashing of FIR No. 594/2020 and charge-sheet No. 280/2022 pending before JMFC Pathardi.

Filing Reason

The FIR was registered for offences under Sections 498A, 313, 323, 504, 506 r/w 34 IPC based on allegations of cruelty and demand of dowry by the wife against her husband and in-laws.

Issues

Whether the FIR and charge-sheet can be quashed under Section 482 CrPC on the basis of a compromise between the parties in a matrimonial dispute involving non-compoundable offences.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners' counsel submitted that the parties have amicably settled the dispute and the informant wife has no objection to quashing of FIR. Respondent no. 2's counsel confirmed the settlement and no objection. APP for the State left the matter to the court's discretion.

Ratio Decidendi

In matrimonial disputes, when the parties have amicably settled their differences and the complainant has no objection, the High Court can exercise its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to quash the FIR and charge-sheet to secure the ends of justice, even if the offences are non-compoundable.

Judgment Excerpts

By the present petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India r/w. Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the petitioner nos. 1 to 6 are praying for quashing and setting aside of the FIR vide Crime No. 594/2020 registered at Pathardi Police Station... The marriage between petitioner no. 6 and the respondent no. 2 was solemnized on 19.11.2017. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the dispute is amicably settled between the parties. The learned counsel for respondent no. 2 submitted that the dispute is amicably settled and she has no objection for quashing of the FIR. In view of the settlement between the parties, the FIR and charge-sheet deserve to be quashed.

Procedural History

The FIR was registered on the complaint of respondent no. 2. After investigation, charge-sheet was filed and the case was pending as R.C.C. No. 349/2022 before JMFC Pathardi. The petitioners then filed the present writ petition under Article 227 and Section 482 CrPC for quashing.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 482
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 498A, 313, 323, 504, 506, 34
  • Constitution of India: Article 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Quashing of FIR in Matrimonial Dispute Due to Settlement Between Husband and Wife. The court exercised inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to quash FIR for offences under Sections 498A, 313, 323, 504, 506 r/w 34 IPC after ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Dying Declarations. Conviction under Section 302 IPC for causing burn injuries to victim set aside as dying declarations were contradictory and not corroborated by medical evidence.