Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
High Court

WRIT PETITION NO.739 OF 2021

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
Admin
2026-09-27 19:46:18
  • 127
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

WRIT PETITION NO.739 OF 2021

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (BOM) (08) 77

Writ Petition No.739 of 2021 with Writ Petition No.1023 of 2021, Writ Petition No.2454 of 2022, Writ Petition No.2368 of 2022, Writ Petition No.2457 of 2022

2022-08-29

R.D. Dhanuka, M.G. Sewlikar

2022:BHC-OS:7064-DB

Vineet Naik, Kunal Dwarkadas, Sukand Kulkarni, Shailesh Mahimturai, Zal Andhyarujina, Ayaz Bilawala, Yogesh Gaikwad, Kunal Bhanage, Akshay Pawar, Anish Khandekar, Atul Damle, Yashodeep Deshmukh, Vandana Mahadik, Jyoti Chavan, Himanushu Takke, Uma Palsuldesai, Amit Shastri, Shamrao B. Gore, Darshit Jain, Divya D. Jain, Dileep Satale

Pankaj Unit No. 1 Housing Development Company Private Limited; Pankaj Unit No. 2 Housing Development Company Private Limited; Samartha Development Corporation; Oshiwara Land Development Company Private Limited; Mr. Hasmukh Dipchand Gardi; The Samarth Nagar Lokhandwala Complex Co-operative Housing Societies Association Ltd.; Apna Ghar (East) CHS Association Ltd.; Apna Ghar (West) CHS Association Ltd.

The State of Maharashtra through Additional Chief Secretary, Revenue & Forest Department; Divisional Commissioner, Konkan Division at Mumbai; Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai; Chief Engineer (Development Plan) Mumbai Municipal Corporation; The Tahsildar, Andheri; Byramjee Jeejeebhoy Private Limited; Oshiwara Land Development Company Private Limited; Pankaj Unit No. 1 Housing Development Company Private Limited; Pankaj Unit No. 2 Housing Development Company Private Limited; Samartha Development Corporation

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions concerning land rights and development in Oshiwara village, Mumbai

Judgment Excerpts

Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Learned counsel for the respective respondents waive service. During the period between 2nd October 1860 to 1948, by a kowl/grant dated 2nd October 1860, the Principal Collector of Konkan (on behalf of the East India Company) granted inter alia the entire village Oshiwara, including Survey No.41, admeasuring 723 acres and 30 gunthas in favour of the predecessors-in-title of Byramjee Jeejeebhoy Private Limited (Respondent no.6), without the requirement to pay land revenue. On 4th January 1952, the Salsette Estates (Land Revenue Exemption Abolition), 1951 came into force. On 15th April 1964, the Mamlatdar, Andheri conducted an enquiry under Section 4 of the Salsette Estates Act

Procedural History

Batch of writ petitions heard together; rule issued returnable forthwith; reserved on 5 July 2022; pronounced on 29 August 2022.

Acts & Sections

  • Companies Act, 1956:
  • Indian Partnership Act, 1932:
  • Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960:
  • Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888:
  • Salsette Estates (Land Revenue Exemption Abolition), 1951: Section 4
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Tags :
land grant kowl Oshiwara Salsette Estates Act salt pans housing development writ petition Bombay High Court

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Examines Whether Division Bench Direction Under Article 226 Impinges on Arbitral Tribunal's Jurisdiction Under Section 16 of Arbitration Act. The Court Traces Evolution of Judicial Scrutiny at Referral Stage and Considers Excepted Matte... 2026-09-28 04:16:12
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Interim Application in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Dispute Over Ownership of Flat and Alleged Forged Power of Attorney. Court Restrains Respondent No.1 from Creating Third-Party Rights Over Flat Pending Trial, Hol... 2026-09-28 04:16:10
Categories
Popular Tags
writ petition Natural Justice acquittal murder Compensation burden of proof limitation Article 226 Land Acquisition benefit of doubt
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petitions Against Discharge Order in Corruption...

High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Company Secretary in KOPD Act Case Due to ...

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction and Death Sentence in POCSO Case Due to Credible Testimon...

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against High Court's Reversal of Trial Court's Decree on Wi...

Supreme Court Sets Aside Arrest of Vessel Due to Valid Termination of Charterparty. The co...

Supreme Court Restores Compensation Award to Claimants in Railway Accident Case — High C...

Supreme Court Allows Appeal, Acquits Appellant of Rape Charges Due to Lack of Credible Evi...

Lost Your Password?