Case Note & Summary
The judgment excerpt deals with a set of criminal appeals before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, arising out of a single incident that occurred on 02.02.2008 at about 2.00 p.m. near the old bus stand, Ner, district Yavatmal. The prosecution case was that a group of accused persons armed with deadly weapons attacked several persons at a barber shop and later in the weekly market, resulting in the death of Javedkhan and injuries to others. The first informant Anis Khan Tayab Khan Pathan (PW1) along with Javedkhan (deceased), Sheikh Shafik, Aniskhan Mustafakhan (PW5), Imrankhan Abrarkhan and Abrarkhan Afsarkhan had gone to the saloon of Banti Shrivastava. While Sheikh Shafik was shaving and Javedkhan was sitting nearby, accused persons entered the saloon armed with weapons like sword, khanjir, knife, gupti, and iron pipes. They assaulted Javedkhan, Sheikh Shafik and Aniskhan Mustafakhan. The deceased Javedkhan sustained multiple injuries including a severed palm of right hand and died at the scene. The informant was also attacked but escaped and hid near a cinema theatre. After the attack, the accused went towards the weekly cattle market and assaulted Nasrullakhan Afsarkhan and Asrarkhan Afsarkhan, and later assaulted Sabirkhan Wahedkhan at his house. An FIR was lodged and Crime No.11/2008 was registered at Police Station Ner. Investigation was conducted by PI Ram Hake (PW22) who collected evidence including a wrist watch, chappal, boot, sheath and scarf from the saloon, conducted inquest, sent the body for post-mortem, recorded statements, arrested the accused and seized weapons on their production and discovery. The trial court in Sessions Trial No.63/2008 convicted six accused, namely Ijajkhan Jabajkhan Pathan, Hasankhan Jabajkhan, Firozkhan alias Firdoskhan Jabajkhan, Nadimoddin Najmoddin, Ziyaullahkhan Jakaullakhan and Shamiullahkhan Anwarkhan, for offences under Sections 147, 148, 302 read with 149 and 326 read with 149 of the Indian Penal Code, and sentenced them to life imprisonment and other terms. The remaining accused were acquitted. The trial court also acquitted all accused of offences under Sections 4 and 25 of the Arms Act. The absconding accused Nasrullah Khan was tried separately in Sessions Trial No.19/2013 and convicted under Sections 302 read with 149, 307 read with 149, 147 and 148 of the Indian Penal Code, with life sentence, but acquitted under the Arms Act. Aggrieved by these judgments, the convicted accused filed appeals challenging their convictions, and the State filed an appeal challenging the acquittal of the remaining accused and the acquittal of the convicted accused for the offence under Section 307 read with Section 149 IPC. The High Court heard these appeals together as they arose from the same incident. The excerpt, however, does not include the arguments advanced by the parties, the court's analysis, or the final decision in the appeals. The legal issues that appear to be involved include the correctness of convictions based on common object, the sufficiency of evidence for unlawful assembly and individual participation, the sustainability of the State's appeal against acquittal, and the separate trial of the absconding accused. The judgment excerpt primarily provides the procedural background, the prosecution case, and the trial court outcomes.
Headnote
A) Criminal Law - Unlawful Assembly and Rioting - Common Object - Indian Penal Code, 1860, Sections 147, 148, 149 - The trial court convicted six accused for being members of an unlawful assembly with common object to assault and kill victims. The prosecution case described a group of accused persons armed with deadly weapons entering a saloon and attacking victims, followed by further assaults in the weekly market. The High Court was considering appeals against these convictions and the State's appeal against acquittals (Paras 3-5, 6-8). B) Criminal Law - Murder and Grievous Hurt - Common Object - Indian Penal Code, 1860, Sections 302, 326 read with 149 - The deceased Javedkhan suffered multiple injuries including a severed palm and died at the scene; other victims sustained injuries. The trial court convicted six accused for murder and grievous hurt with the aid of Section 149, while the State appealed for additional conviction under Section 307 against some accused. The appeals raised questions about sufficiency of evidence for common object and individual roles (Paras 4-5, 7). C) Criminal Law - Separate Trial of Absconding Accused - Conviction for Same Incident - Indian Penal Code, 1860, Sections 302, 307, 147, 148 read with 149 - Accused Nasrullah Khan was absconding during the main trial, so his case was separated and later tried in Sessions Trial No.19/2013. He was convicted under Sections 302/149, 307/149, 147 and 148, and filed an appeal challenging his conviction. The High Court was to determine whether the separate trial and conviction were sustainable (Paras 4-5).
Issue of Consideration
Whether the trial court correctly convicted accused nos.1, 2, 3, 4, 18 and 21 for offences under Sections 147, 148, 302 read with 149 and 326 read with 149 IPC; whether the trial court erred in acquitting the remaining accused persons of all charges; whether the trial court erred in not convicting accused nos.1 to 4, 18 and 21 for offence under Section 307 read with Section 149 IPC; whether the conviction of Nasrullah Khan in Sessions Trial No.19/2013 under Sections 302/149, 307/149, 147 and 148 IPC is sustainable
Law Points
- Membership in unlawful assembly with common object attracts constructive liability under Section 149 IPC
- conviction under Sections 147 and 148 for rioting and being armed with deadly weapons
- acquittal under Arms Act does not preclude conviction under IPC
- separate trial for absconding accused permissible
- State appeal against acquittal requires leave and merits consideration



