Bombay High Court Allows Disqualified Members to Participate in Cooperative Society Election Pending Final Adjudication — Membership Disqualification Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 101
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, residents of villages in Kolhapur district, claimed to be agriculturists and members of Respondent No. 4 cooperative society. They were disqualified from membership and their names were deleted from the final voters' list by orders dated 13.04.2022 and 19.04.2022 passed by the District Co-operative Election Officer and District Deputy Registrar. The petitioners challenged these orders along with earlier orders of the Assistant Registrar (22.11.2021), Divisional Joint Registrar (12.01.2022), and the Minister of Cooperation (07.03.2022). The election of the society was scheduled for 05.06.2022, and the petitioners sought urgent interim relief to participate. The court found that the disqualification orders were passed without affording the petitioners an opportunity of being heard, violating principles of natural justice. The court set aside the disqualification orders and directed that the petitioners' names be restored in the voters' list, allowing them to vote and contest in the election, subject to the final outcome of the petition. The court also directed that the election process continue and that the results be declared but not implemented without further orders.

Headnote

A) Cooperative Law - Membership Disqualification - Natural Justice - Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 - Sections 27, 28 - Petitioners were disqualified as members and deleted from voters' list without being heard - Court held that the orders of disqualification were passed in violation of principles of natural justice and set them aside - Petitioners allowed to participate in election subject to final outcome (Paras 1-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioners' disqualification from membership of the cooperative society and deletion from the voters' list was valid and whether they should be allowed to participate in the forthcoming election.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court set aside the orders of disqualification dated 13.04.2022 and 19.04.2022, directed restoration of petitioners' names in the voters' list, and allowed them to vote and contest in the election scheduled for 05.06.2022, subject to final outcome. The election results were directed not to be implemented without further orders.

Law Points

  • Natural justice
  • right to be heard
  • membership disqualification
  • cooperative societies
  • election participation
  • interim relief
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (BOM) (06) 21

Writ Petition No. 6180 of 2022 with Interim Application No. 3288 of 2022

2022-06-04

Milind N. Jadhav, Abhay Ahuja

Dr. Uday P. Warunjikar a/w. G.B. Naik for Petitioners; Mr. R.S. Pawar, AGP for State; Mr. Narendra Bandiwadekar a/w. Mr. Utkarsh Desai i/by Mr. Prashant Bhavake for Respondent Nos. 5 to 8; Mr. Deelip Patil Bankar, Chief Standing Counsel SCEA a/w. Ms. Pooja Deelip Patil for Respondent No. 9

Ashwini Sayaji Patil and Ors.

The State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging disqualification of members from cooperative society and deletion from voters' list, seeking interim relief to participate in election.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of disqualification orders and restoration of names in voters' list to allow participation in election.

Filing Reason

Petitioners were disqualified as members and deleted from voters' list without being heard, and election was imminent.

Previous Decisions

Orders dated 22.11.2021 by Assistant Registrar, 12.01.2022 by Divisional Joint Registrar, 07.03.2022 by Minister of Cooperation, and 13.04.2022 and 19.04.2022 by District Co-operative Election Officer.

Issues

Whether the disqualification of petitioners from membership of the cooperative society was valid. Whether the petitioners should be allowed to participate in the forthcoming election.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that they were not heard before disqualification, violating natural justice. Respondents opposed the petition, but the court found merit in the petitioners' submissions.

Ratio Decidendi

Orders of disqualification passed without affording opportunity of hearing are violative of principles of natural justice and liable to be set aside. Interim relief granted to allow participation in election pending final adjudication.

Judgment Excerpts

Being disqualified from the membership of the Society the names of the Petitioners do not appear in the final voting list of the Society. The court set aside the disqualification orders and directed restoration of names in the voters' list.

Procedural History

The petitioners challenged orders of Assistant Registrar (22.11.2021), Divisional Joint Registrar (12.01.2022), Minister of Cooperation (07.03.2022), and District Co-operative Election Officer (13.04.2022 and 19.04.2022) by way of writ petition. The matter was heard by vacation bench on 04.06.2022.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960: Sections 27, 28
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Seeks Resolution of Dispute Over Unauthorized Colony in Faridabad Through Arbitration and Committee Formation. The Court directs parties to submit responses on land extent, layout, and development charges to facilitate completion of the...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court Upholds Detention Order under COFEPOSA Act for Smuggled Goods Concealment Despite Argument of Classification Under Section 3(1)(i). Activities of Transporting Concealed Watches and Phones and Dealing in Smuggled Goods Held to Fall Under Se...