Case Note & Summary
The petitioner, a 19-year-old individual born with female characteristics and raised as a female, applied for the post of Police Constable under the Scheduled Caste female category in the Nashik Rural Police Recruitment, 2018. She cleared the written examination and physical test, obtaining 171 marks out of 200. During the medical examination, a karyotyping test was conducted at the National Institute of Immunohaematology, which reported that her blood showed XY chromosomes. Based on this report, Sir J.J. Hospital opined that she was male, and the respondents (State of Maharashtra and Superintendent of Police) denied her appointment. The petitioner sought information under the RTI Act and learned that the merit list for male SC category closed at 182 marks and for female SC category at 168 marks. Despite her marks being above the female cutoff, she was not issued a joining letter. The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking quashing of the impugned letters and direction to issue a joining letter. The court considered the issue of whether the medical report could override the petitioner's self-identified gender and whether the denial violated fundamental rights. The court held that the petitioner's gender identity as female, based on her birth, upbringing, and self-identification, must be respected. The karyotyping test alone cannot determine gender for employment purposes. The court found that the respondents' action was discriminatory and violative of Articles 14, 15, 16, and 21. The court allowed the petition, quashed the impugned letters, and directed the respondents to issue a joining letter to the petitioner within four weeks.
Headnote
A) Constitutional Law - Right to Equality - Gender Identity - Articles 14, 15, 16, 21 of the Constitution of India - The petitioner, born with female characteristics and raised as a female, was denied appointment as a police constable in the female category based on a karyotyping report showing XY chromosomes. The court held that the medical report cannot override the petitioner's self-identified gender and that discrimination on the basis of gender identity violates fundamental rights. The court directed the respondents to issue a joining letter to the petitioner. (Paras 1-12)
B) Service Law - Police Recruitment - Medical Examination - Gender Determination - The court held that a karyotyping test is not conclusive for gender determination and that the respondents should have considered the petitioner's physical appearance, upbringing, and self-identification. The court noted that the petitioner had been treated as a female throughout her life and had applied under the female category. (Paras 3-10)
C) Constitutional Law - Right to Livelihood - Article 21 - The court held that the denial of employment to the petitioner solely on the basis of a medical report showing XY chromosomes amounts to deprivation of livelihood and violates Article 21. The court emphasized that the right to livelihood is an integral part of the right to life. (Paras 11-12)
Issue of Consideration
Whether the petitioner, who was born with female characteristics and raised as a female, can be denied employment as a police constable in the female category solely on the basis of a karyotyping report showing XY chromosomes, and whether such denial violates fundamental rights under Articles 14, 15, 16, and 21 of the Constitution of India.
Final Decision
The court allowed the petition. The impugned letters dated 8th February 2019 and 18th April 2019 were quashed and set aside. The respondents were directed to issue a joining letter to the petitioner in connection with the Nashik Rural Police Recruitment, 2018 within four weeks from the date of the order.
Law Points
- Right to self-identify gender
- Intersex rights
- Discrimination on basis of sex and gender
- Article 14
- Article 15
- Article 16
- Article 21
- Right to equality
- Right to life
- Right to livelihood
- Medical certificate cannot determine gender for employment
- Karyotyping test not conclusive for gender determination
Case Details
2022 LawText (BOM) (05) 28
Writ Petition No. 8000 of 2021
Revati Mohite Dere, Madhav J. Jamdar
Mr. Vijaykumar R. Garad for the Petitioner, Mr. A. A. Kumbhakoni, Advocate General a/w Mr. P. P. Kakade, Govt. Pleader, Mr. Akshay Shinde, `B’ Panel Counsel and Mr. R. P. Kadam, A.G.P for the Respondent Nos. 1 & 2–State
The State of Maharashtra, The Superintendent of Police, Nasik Rural, Nasik
Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more)
Subscribe Now
Nature of Litigation
Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking quashing of letters denying appointment and direction to issue joining letter for police constable post.
Remedy Sought
Quashing of impugned letters dated 8th February 2019 and 18th April 2019 and direction to respondent No.2 to issue joining letter to the petitioner for Nashik Rural Police Recruitment, 2018.
Filing Reason
The petitioner was denied appointment as police constable in female category despite qualifying, based on a karyotyping report showing XY chromosomes, which the respondents treated as determining male gender.
Previous Decisions
The petitioner had applied under RTI and was informed that merit list for male SC category closed at 182 marks and female SC category at 168 marks; she had 171 marks but was not issued joining letter.
Issues
Whether the denial of appointment to the petitioner on the basis of a karyotyping report showing XY chromosomes is violative of fundamental rights under Articles 14, 15, 16, and 21 of the Constitution.
Whether the medical report can override the petitioner's self-identified gender and her upbringing as a female.
Submissions/Arguments
The petitioner argued that she was born with female characteristics, raised as a female, and has always identified as a female. The karyotyping test alone cannot determine her gender for employment purposes. The denial of appointment is discriminatory and violates her fundamental rights.
The respondents argued that based on the medical report from Sir J.J. Hospital, the petitioner was found to have XY chromosomes and was therefore male, and thus could not be appointed in the female category.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the petitioner's gender identity as female, based on her birth, upbringing, and self-identification, must be respected. A karyotyping test showing XY chromosomes is not conclusive for gender determination in the context of employment. Denying appointment solely on such a medical report violates the right to equality (Article 14), right against discrimination (Articles 15 and 16), and right to life and livelihood (Article 21) under the Constitution of India.
Judgment Excerpts
We have masked the name of the petitioner in the cause-title of this order and described the petitioner’s name as `ABC’.
By this petition preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks quashing and setting aside of the impugned letters dated 8th February 2019 and 18th April 2019 passed by the respondent No.2-Superintendent of Nashik Rural, Nashik and also a direction to the said respondent to issue a joining letter to the petitioner in connection with the Nashik Rural Police Recruitment, 2018.
The petitioner who was aged 19 years at the relevant time, had filed an application for the Nashik Rural Police Recruitment, 2018 under the Scheduled Caste reserved category.
It appears that the report given by the National Institute of Immunohaematology for Karyotyping test showed that the blood of the petitioner was found having “XY” Chromosomes.
The Superintendent of Police, Nashik Rural, Nashik, informed the petitioner that in the said Police Recruitment, the Merit List for Male in the SC Category had closed at 182 marks and for the Female SC Category had closed at 168 marks. The petitioner had filed an application in the Female SC Category and had obtained 171 marks.
Procedural History
The petitioner applied for police constable post in 2018 under SC female category. After clearing written and physical tests, she underwent medical examination. Karyotyping test showed XY chromosomes. Sir J.J. Hospital opined she was male. Respondents denied appointment via letters dated 8th February 2019 and 18th April 2019. Petitioner sought RTI information and then filed writ petition in Bombay High Court in 2021. The court heard the matter and delivered judgment on 6th May 2022.
Acts & Sections
- Constitution of India: Article 14, Article 15, Article 16, Article 21, Article 226
- Right to Information Act, 2005:
