Bombay High Court Allows Compassionate Appointment Despite Pending Staffing Pattern Sanction — Education Officer Cannot Deny Approval on Grounds of Administrative Delay. The Court held that the Education Officer's refusal to approve the compassionate appointment of the petitioner as Peon on the ground of pending sanction for new staffing pattern was unjustified and directed approval and salary from the date of initial appointment.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 122
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Smt. Sangita Sanjay More, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 12.03.2019 passed by the Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Jalgaon, rejecting her proposal for appointment on compassionate ground as Peon in respondent No. 3 School. The petitioner also sought directions to grant approval and pay salary from the date of initial appointment i.e. 01.07.2018. The undisputed facts are that the petitioner's husband, Sanjay More, was a Peon in the school and passed away on 08.05.2018. The petitioner applied for compassionate appointment on 12.07.2018. The school passed a resolution appointing her as Peon on 01.07.2018 and forwarded the proposal to the Education Officer on 29.08.2018. On 12.03.2019, the Education Officer refused approval on the ground that sanction for the new staffing pattern was pending with the Government. The Court considered the submissions and held that the Education Officer cannot deny approval on such a ground, as the appointment was made on compassionate basis. The Court directed the Education Officer to grant approval and pay salary from the date of initial appointment. The petition was allowed.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Compassionate Appointment - Approval - Pending Staffing Pattern - The Education Officer refused approval to the petitioner's compassionate appointment as Peon on the ground that sanction for the new staffing pattern was pending with the Government. The Court held that the Education Officer cannot deny approval on such a ground as the appointment was made on compassionate basis and the school had already appointed the petitioner. The Court directed the Education Officer to grant approval and pay salary from the date of initial appointment. (Paras 1-6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Education Officer can refuse approval to a compassionate appointment on the ground that sanction for the new staffing pattern is pending with the Government.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The order dated 12.03.2019 passed by respondent No. 2 is quashed and set aside. Respondent No. 2 is directed to grant approval to the petitioner's appointment as Peon on compassionate ground from the date of initial appointment i.e. 01.07.2018 and to pay salary from that date.

Law Points

  • Compassionate appointment
  • pending staffing pattern
  • approval cannot be denied
  • education officer
  • school
  • peon
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (BOM) (03) 2

WRIT PETITION NO. 6816 OF 2019

2022-03-25

Smt. Sadhana S. Jadhav, S.G. Dige

Mr. Ajay D. Pawar for petitioner, Ms. M.A. Deshpande Addl. G.P. for respondent-State

Smt. Sangita Sanjay More

The State of Maharashtra, The Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Jalgaon, Late Parshuram Kondiba Shinde Madhyamik Vidyalaya

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging rejection of compassionate appointment proposal

Remedy Sought

Petitioner seeks quashing of order dated 12.03.2019 and directions to grant approval and pay salary from date of initial appointment

Filing Reason

Education Officer refused approval to compassionate appointment on ground of pending sanction for new staffing pattern

Previous Decisions

Education Officer refused approval on 12.03.2019

Issues

Whether the Education Officer can refuse approval to compassionate appointment on the ground that sanction for new staffing pattern is pending with the Government

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the Education Officer cannot deny approval on the ground of pending staffing pattern sanction as the appointment was on compassionate basis

Ratio Decidendi

The Education Officer cannot refuse approval to a compassionate appointment on the ground that sanction for the new staffing pattern is pending with the Government, as the appointment is made on compassionate basis and the school has already appointed the candidate.

Judgment Excerpts

The Education Officer cannot deny approval on such a ground as the appointment was made on compassionate basis and the school had already appointed the petitioner.

Procedural History

Petitioner filed writ petition on 22.03.2022, heard finally at admission stage, judgment pronounced on 25.03.2022.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Fresh Advertisement Without Exhausting Select List in MCGM Recruitment for Junior Engineer (Civil) Posts. The Court held that a public authority cannot ignore a valid select list and issue a fresh ad...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Shikshan Sevak in Minority Institution Despite Non-Absorption of Surplus Teacher. Religious Minority Management Not Required to Absorb Surplus Teachers Under Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions...