Bombay High Court Quashes Disqualification of OBC Candidate in Grampanchayat Election — Caste Scrutiny Committee Order Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice. Petitioner's Kunbi Caste Certificate Invalidated Without Proper Opportunity of Hearing, Order Passed Without Considering Relevant Documents.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 6
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Ranjit Prakash Gaikwad, contested the Grampanchayat election from Ward No.1 of Grampanchayat Kasar Amboli, Taluka Mulshi, District Pune, which was reserved for Other Backward Class (OBC). He claimed to belong to the 'Kunbi' caste, which is recognized as OBC in Maharashtra. The Divisional Officer, Maval-Mulshi Sub-Division, issued a caste certificate dated 9th December 2020 to the petitioner certifying him as belonging to the Kunbi caste. The petitioner was declared elected in the election held in January 2021 from Ward No.1, while Respondent No.4, Vinayak Sunil Raut, who contested from Ward No.4, was defeated. Respondent No.4 filed a complaint with the District Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee (Respondent No.2) challenging the petitioner's caste certificate. The Committee, by its order dated 9th April 2021, invalidated the petitioner's caste certificate. Consequently, the Collector (Respondent No.3) passed an order dated 16th July 2021 disqualifying the petitioner as a member of the Grampanchayat. The petitioner challenged both orders by way of a writ petition. The High Court noted that the Committee had not given the petitioner a proper opportunity of hearing and had not considered the documents submitted by him. The Court held that the impugned order of the Committee was in gross violation of the principles of natural justice and was therefore quashed and set aside. Consequently, the Collector's order disqualifying the petitioner was also quashed. The matter was remanded to the Committee for fresh consideration, with a direction to give the petitioner a due opportunity of hearing and to decide the matter in accordance with law within a period of three months. The Court also directed that the petitioner's caste certificate shall remain valid until the Committee decides the matter afresh.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Caste Certificate Scrutiny - Natural Justice - Maharashtra Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, De-notified Tribes (Vimukta Jatis), Nomadic Tribes, Other Backward Classes and Special Backward Category (Regulation of Issuance and Verification of) Caste Certificate Act, 2000 - The Committee invalidated the petitioner's caste certificate without giving him a proper opportunity of hearing and without considering the documents submitted by him. Held that the order is in gross violation of principles of natural justice and is quashed and set aside. (Paras 2-4)

B) Local Self-Government - Disqualification of Member - Grampanchayat Act, 1959 - The Collector's order disqualifying the petitioner as a member of Grampanchayat was based on the invalid order of the Committee. Since the Committee's order is quashed, the Collector's order also stands quashed. Held that the matter is remanded to the Committee for fresh consideration after giving due opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. (Paras 4-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the impugned order dated 9-4-2021 passed by the District Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee invalidating the petitioner's caste certificate and the consequential order dated 16-7-2021 passed by the Collector disqualifying the petitioner as a member of Grampanchayat are sustainable in law.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The impugned order dated 9-4-2021 passed by the District Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee and the order dated 16-7-2021 passed by the Collector are quashed and set aside. The matter is remanded to the Committee for fresh consideration after giving due opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. The Committee shall decide the matter in accordance with law within a period of three months. The petitioner's caste certificate shall remain valid until the Committee decides the matter afresh.

Law Points

  • Natural justice
  • Caste certificate scrutiny
  • Opportunity of hearing
  • Disqualification of elected member
  • Quashing of order
  • Remand for reconsideration
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (BOM) (02) 84

WRIT PETITION NO. 2035 OF 2021

2022-02-14

S.J. Kathawalla, Milind N. Jadhav

Mr. R.K. Mendadkar for Petitioner, Mr. R.S. Pawar, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3, Mr. T.D. Deshmukh for Respondent No.4

Ranjit Prakash Gaikwad

State of Maharashtra, District Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee Pune District, Collector Pune, Vinayak Sunil Raut

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging the order of the District Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee invalidating the petitioner's caste certificate and the consequential order of the Collector disqualifying the petitioner as a member of Grampanchayat.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought quashing of the Committee's order dated 9-4-2021 and the Collector's order dated 16-7-2021, and a direction to reconsider the matter.

Filing Reason

The petitioner's caste certificate was invalidated by the Committee without proper opportunity of hearing, leading to his disqualification as a member of Grampanchayat.

Previous Decisions

The Committee passed an order on 9-4-2021 invalidating the petitioner's caste certificate. The Collector passed an order on 16-7-2021 disqualifying the petitioner as a member of Grampanchayat.

Issues

Whether the impugned order of the Caste Scrutiny Committee dated 9-4-2021 is sustainable in law? Whether the Collector's order dated 16-7-2021 disqualifying the petitioner is valid?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the Committee did not give him a proper opportunity of hearing and did not consider the documents submitted by him. Respondent No.4 supported the Committee's order.

Ratio Decidendi

An order invalidating a caste certificate without giving the holder a proper opportunity of hearing and without considering the documents submitted by him is in gross violation of the principles of natural justice and is liable to be quashed.

Judgment Excerpts

By the present Writ Petition, the Petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs: ... Briefly stated the facts are as under:- ... The Committee has not given a proper opportunity of hearing to the Petitioner and has not considered the documents submitted by him. The impugned order dated 9-4-2021 passed by the Respondent No.2 Committee is in gross violation of the principles of natural justice and is therefore quashed and set aside.

Procedural History

The petitioner was issued a caste certificate on 9-12-2020. He was declared elected in Grampanchayat election in January 2021. Respondent No.4 filed a complaint challenging the certificate. The Committee invalidated the certificate on 9-4-2021. The Collector disqualified the petitioner on 16-7-2021. The petitioner filed the present writ petition challenging both orders.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, De-notified Tribes (Vimukta Jatis), Nomadic Tribes, Other Backward Classes and Special Backward Category (Regulation of Issuance and Verification of) Caste Certificate Act, 2000:
  • Grampanchayat Act, 1959:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Modifies Land Acquisition Award in State Appeal — Market Value Reduced to Rs.22.58 per sqm Based on Comparable Sale Instance. Separate Compensation for Trees and Section 23(1A) Benefits Denied as Award Pre-dated 1984 Amendment.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Insurance Company's Appeals in Motor Accident Claims — Reduces Compensation Due to Lack of Proof of Income. Claimants failed to establish income of deceased, leading to reduction of compensation awarded by MACT.