Bombay High Court Allows Transfer of Restitution of Conjugal Rights Petition from Kolhapur to Vasai on Grounds of Wife's Medical Condition and Convenience. Wife's autoimmune disease and pending divorce and DV proceedings at Vasai weighed in favour of transfer under Section 24 CPC.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 108
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicant wife filed an application under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking transfer of Petition No.167 of 2021 filed by the respondent husband under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, for restitution of conjugal rights, from the Family Court at Kolhapur to the Court of Civil Judge, Senior Division, Vasai, Palghar. The marriage was solemnized on 27th December 2020 at Pune, but the parties resided separately after marriage—the husband at Kolhapur and the wife at Boisar. The wife alleged that the husband was having extramarital affairs and was active on matrimonial websites. She lodged FIR No.425 of 2021 under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC at Manikpur Police Station on 6th November 2021. She also filed domestic violence proceedings before the JMFC, Vasai, and a divorce petition (Petition No.373 of 2022) before the Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Vasai, on grounds of cheating and extramarital affair. The wife, a doctor, claimed she suffers from Systemic Lupus Erythematosus with Nephritis, an autoimmune disease requiring immunosuppressive medication, causing spinal degeneration and radiculopathy, and was advised to avoid long-distance travel. She submitted medical certificates. The husband opposed the transfer, arguing that the wife was a doctor and could travel. The court considered the wife's medical condition, the pendency of other proceedings at Vasai, and the principle that convenience of the wife should be given weight. The court allowed the application, transferring the petition to the Court of Civil Judge, Senior Division, Vasai, with a direction to decide it expeditiously.

Headnote

A) Family Law - Transfer of Proceedings - Section 24 CPC - Restitution of Conjugal Rights - Wife sought transfer of husband's petition from Family Court, Kolhapur to Vasai due to her serious autoimmune disease (Systemic Lupus Erythematosus with Nephritis) and pending divorce and DV proceedings at Vasai - Court held that balance of convenience lies in favour of wife, considering her medical condition and that she is a woman, and transferred the petition to Vasai (Paras 1-6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petition for restitution of conjugal rights filed by the husband at Kolhapur should be transferred to Vasai at the wife's request considering her medical condition and other pending proceedings.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Application allowed. Petition No.167 of 2021 pending before the Family Court, Kolhapur is transferred to the Court of Civil Judge, Senior Division, Vasai, Palghar. The transferee court is directed to decide the petition expeditiously.

Law Points

  • Transfer of proceedings under Section 24 CPC
  • convenience of wife
  • medical grounds
  • balance of convenience
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (BOM) (12) 103

Miscellaneous Civil Application No. 87 of 2022

2023-12-22

Abhay Ahuja

Mr. Osman Chishty i/by Mr. Irfan Shaikh for Applicant, Mr. Rahul B. Khot for Respondent

Reshma Shivraj Bhosale

Shivraj Bapusaheb Bhosle

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Application under Section 24 CPC for transfer of a petition for restitution of conjugal rights under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act.

Remedy Sought

Transfer of Petition No.167 of 2021 from Family Court, Kolhapur to Court of Civil Judge, Senior Division, Vasai, Palghar.

Filing Reason

Wife's medical condition (Systemic Lupus Erythematosus with Nephritis) making travel to Kolhapur difficult, and pendency of other proceedings at Vasai.

Issues

Whether the petition for restitution of conjugal rights should be transferred from Kolhapur to Vasai considering the wife's medical condition and convenience.

Submissions/Arguments

Applicant: Wife suffers from autoimmune disease, advised to avoid long travel; has pending divorce and DV proceedings at Vasai; is financially drained and unable to travel. Respondent: Wife is a doctor and can travel; opposed transfer.

Ratio Decidendi

The balance of convenience lies in favour of the wife, considering her serious medical condition, the pendency of other proceedings at Vasai, and the principle that convenience of the wife should be given weight in transfer matters.

Judgment Excerpts

This is an Application under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking transfer of Petition for Restitution of Conjugal Rights under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955... Learned Counsel submits that the Applicant is suffering from Systemic Lupus Erythematosus – Nephritis which is an autoimmune disease... Having heard the learned Counsel and having perused the medical certificates/reports, this Court is of the view that the balance of convenience is in favour of the Applicant...

Procedural History

The respondent husband filed Petition No.167 of 2021 under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act before the Family Court, Kolhapur. The applicant wife filed this application under Section 24 CPC seeking transfer of that petition to Vasai. The application was heard and allowed on 22nd December 2023.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Section 24
  • Hindu Marriage Act, 1955: Section 9
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 498A, 323, 504, 506
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Partnership Firm Appeal Against Customs Penalties for Attempted Illegal Export of Indian Currency. Firm's Liability Upheld as Currency Notes Are 'Goods' Under Sea Customs Act, 1878 Section 167 and Firm Is a 'Person' Under Fore...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition for Alleged Violation of Status Quo Order in Cooperative Housing Society Dispute. Court holds that contempt petition was premature and without proper notice of order to alleged contemnors, imposing costs ...