Bombay High Court Hears Group of Writ Petitions Challenging Demolition and Regularization Orders for APMC Ahmednagar Constructions. Petitions Filed Under Article 226 and 227 of Constitution of India Were Clubbed for Common Hearing Due to Common Subject Matter of Unauthorized Constructions and Orders of Demolition/Removal.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The judgment excerpt pertains to a group of writ petitions filed in the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, arising from a common subject matter: constructions raised within the premises of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC), Ahmednagar, and orders of demolition or removal passed by the Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Ahmednagar. By order dated 6 January 2023, the Honourable Senior-most Judge at this Bench directed clubbing of all these writ petitions for common hearing. The matters included Writ Petition No. 11220 of 2021 filed by Ahmednagar Vegetable and Fruit Commission Agents Association seeking directions to remove illegal constructions; Writ Petition Nos. 8894 of 2012 and 8946 of 2012 filed by lease holders of APMC challenging the order dated 12 October 2012 passed by Deputy Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Ahmednagar directing removal of unauthorized construction; Writ Petition Nos. 9013 and 9022 of 2018 filed by individual lease holders assailing the order dated 21 July 2018 passed by Deputy Commissioner rejecting APMC's regularization proposal for construction on final plot No. 23 and the communication dated 1 August 2018; and Writ Petition No. 7741 of 2020 filed by APMC challenging the order of the Minister, Urban Development, Mantralaya dated 15 July 2019 in appeal, which confirmed the Commissioner's order dated 21 July 2018 rejecting regularization. The excerpt ends at paragraph 4; therefore, the legal issues framed, arguments advanced, court's analysis, and final decision are not available in the provided text.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Writ Jurisdiction - Article 226, 227 Constitution of India - Group of Petitions Challenging Demolition and Regularization Orders - The High Court noted that the group of writ petitions arose from common subject matter pertaining to construction in APMC premises and orders of demolition/removal passed by Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Ahmednagar. The petitions were clubbed for common hearing by order dated 6.1.2023. Held that all petitions were heard together (Paras 1-4).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

WRIT PETITION NO. 7741 OF 2020

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Law Points

  • Writ jurisdiction under Article 226 and 227 of Constitution of India
  • challenge to demolition orders
  • challenge to rejection of regularization
  • common subject matter
  • clubbing of petitions
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (BOM) (06) 129

Writ Petition No. 7741 of 2020; Writ Petition No. 9013 of 2018; Writ Petition No. 9022 of 2018; Writ Petition No. 8894 of 2012; Writ Petition No. 8946 of 2012; Writ Petition No. 11220 of 2021

2023-06-30

Nitin W. Sambre, S.G. Chapalgaonkar

Sanjeev Deshpande, Pramod S. Gaikwad, P.K. Lakhotiya, K.N. Lokhande, V.H. Dighe, Sanjay N. Gaikwad, Z.H. Farooqui, N.V. Gaware, G.K. Naik Thigle, Sanjiv Deshpande, R.B. Narvade Patil

Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Ahmednagar; Abhay Rasiklal Luniya & Ors.; Kaushik Pravindchand Kothari & Ors.; Shivaji Paraji Chavan & Ors.; Dattatraya Mahipatrao Ghorpade & Ors.; Ahmednagar Vegetables and Fruit Commission Agent Association

The Hon’ble Minister, Urban Development Department, Maharashtra State; The Ahmednagar Municipal Corporation; Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Ahmednagar; The State of Maharashtra; The Divisional Commissioner, Nashik Region; The Municipal Corporation, Ahmednagar; The Collector, Ahmednagar District; Kishan R. Ratnale; Yash Trading Company; Atul Bhausaheb Karale; M/s Hiralal Hasmatlal Bhandari; M/s Harshadkumar Kantilal & Company; Kishor Mithulal Gugale; R.K. Traders; Shriram Traders; M/s Sadashiv Shankar Babar; Mohit Traders; Satish Sarjerao Gund; Sham Baburao Nimse; Satish Mulchand Gugale; Shri Jay Anand Trading Company

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Group of writ petitions under Article 226 and 227 of Constitution of India concerning unauthorized constructions in APMC Ahmednagar premises and orders of demolition/removal passed by Municipal Corporation.

Remedy Sought

Various lease holders and APMC sought quashing of demolition orders and rejection of regularization; Ahmednagar Vegetables and Fruit Commission Agents Association sought directions to remove illegal constructions.

Filing Reason

Unauthorized constructions raised in APMC Ahmednagar premises led to demolition/removal orders and rejection of regularization proposals, which were challenged in these petitions.

Previous Decisions

Deputy Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Ahmednagar passed order dated 12.10.2012 directing removal of unauthorized construction; Deputy Commissioner passed order dated 21.7.2018 rejecting regularization proposal; Minister, Urban Development, Mantralaya passed order dated 15.7.2019 in appeal confirming order dated 21.7.2018.

Judgment Excerpts

This group of writ petitions, filed under Article 226 & 227 of Constitution of India arise out of common subject matter pertaining to the construction raised in the premises of Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC), Ahmednagar and orders of demolition / removal passed by the Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Ahmednagar. Writ petition No. 11220 of 2021 has been filed by Ahmednagar Vegetable and Fruit Commission Agents Association, seeking directions against respondents to remove illegal constructions raised in the premises of APMC Ahmednagar.

Procedural History

Writ Petition Nos. 8894 and 8946 of 2012 were filed challenging order dated 12.10.2012; Writ Petition Nos. 9013 and 9022 of 2018 were filed challenging order dated 21.7.2018 and communication dated 1.8.2018; Writ Petition No. 7741 of 2020 was filed challenging order dated 15.7.2019 in appeal; Writ Petition No. 11220 of 2021 was filed seeking removal of illegal constructions. By order dated 6.1.2023, all petitions were directed to be clubbed for common hearing. The matters were heard together, reserved on 2.5.2023, and pronounced on 30.6.2023.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226, Article 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Judicature at Bombay Nagpur Bench Hears Appeals Against Order in Unspecified Subject Matter — Outcome Not Mentioned in Extracted Text. No specific legal finding or principle is available from the provided text.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of State Transport Driver for Murder and Rampage in Confirmation Case and Appeal. Conviction under Sections 302, 307, 324, 381, 427 IPC and Section 3(2) Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act Affirmed; Insani...