Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Non-Selection of Woman Candidate for District Manager Post in Seeds Corporation. Reservation for Women Not Properly Implemented as No Woman Candidate Selected Despite 30% Reservation.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 19
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Ku. Swati Nagorao Magar, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Nagpur challenging the communication dated 24.10.2018 issued by respondent 1, Maharashtra State Seeds Corporation Limited, and seeking a direction to consider her for the post of District Manager Grade 2/Field Officer in the seat reserved for women category. The advertisement for the post was published on 7.5.2018, and out of four posts, one was reserved for Scheduled Caste, one for Other Backward Classes, two for open category, with 30% reservation for women and one post for physically handicapped. The petitioner applied, appeared for an online examination on 11.6.2018, and her name was published in the merit list dated 20.8.2018. She was called for document verification and personal interview on 4.8.2018. However, after the interviews, her name was not in the selection list, and no candidate was selected from the women category. The petitioner made a representation on 27.9.2018 to the Managing Director and also approached the Maharashtra State Commission for Women. The court heard the parties and found that the non-selection of any woman candidate despite the 30% reservation was arbitrary. The court quashed the communication dated 24.10.2018 and directed respondent 1 to consider the petitioner's candidature for the post in the women reserved category within four weeks.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Reservation for Women - Non-Selection - The petitioner, a woman candidate, applied for the post of District Manager Grade 2/Field Officer advertised by Maharashtra State Seeds Corporation Limited. Despite 30% reservation for women, no woman candidate was selected. The court held that the non-selection of any woman candidate despite the reservation was arbitrary and directed the Corporation to consider the petitioner's candidature against the women reserved seat. (Paras 2-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the non-selection of the petitioner from the women category despite 30% reservation is arbitrary and illegal.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the petition, quashed the communication dated 24.10.2018, and directed respondent 1 to consider the petitioner's candidature for the post of District Manager Grade 2/Field Officer in the women reserved category within four weeks.

Law Points

  • Reservation for women
  • Selection process
  • Quashing of communication
  • Direction to consider candidature
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (BOM) (03) 140

Writ Petition No.8357/2018

2023-03-08

Rohit B. Deo, Mrs. Vrushali V. Joshi

Mr. S.V. Purohit for Petitioner, Mr. K.S. Malokar for Respondent 1, Mr. R.L. Khapre Senior Counsel for Respondent 2, Mr. Shankar Borkute for Intervenor

Ku. Swati Nagorao Magar

Maharashtra State Seeds Corporation Limited, Shashishekhar Anantrao Jawale

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging non-selection for a post despite reservation for women.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of communication dated 24.10.2018 and direction to consider petitioner for the post of District Manager Grade 2/Field Officer in women reserved seat.

Filing Reason

Petitioner was not selected for the post despite 30% reservation for women and no woman candidate was selected.

Issues

Whether the non-selection of the petitioner from the women category despite 30% reservation is arbitrary and illegal.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that despite 30% reservation for women, no woman candidate was selected, which is arbitrary. Respondent Corporation argued that the selection was based on merit and no woman candidate was found suitable.

Ratio Decidendi

The non-selection of any woman candidate despite 30% reservation is arbitrary and violative of the reservation policy. The Corporation must consider the petitioner's candidature against the women reserved seat.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner seeks quashing of the communication dated 24.10.2018 issued by respondent 1 and for a direction to the respondent 1 to consider her for the post of District Manager Grade 2 / Field Officer in seat reserved in women category. The petitioner was expecting to be selected from women candidate but, no candidate was selected from said category.

Procedural History

Petitioner applied for post, appeared for exam and interview, not selected, made representation, approached Maharashtra State Commission for Women, then filed writ petition.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Non-Selection of Woman Candidate for District Manager Post in Seeds Corporation. Reservation for Women Not Properly Implemented as No Woman Candidate Selected Despite 30% Reservation.
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Delivers Judgment on Insurer's Civil Miscellaneous Appeal Against Compensation Award to Legal Representatives of Deceased Motorcyclist. The Tribunal Awarded Compensation to the Family of a 31-Year-Old IT Professional Killed in a Col...