Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Attempt to Murder in Domestic Violence Case — Minor Son's Testimony Found Credible Despite Being Child Witness. The court affirmed the conviction under Sections 302 and 324 IPC based on the reliable testimony of the injured minor son and corroborating medical evidence.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Prosecution
  • 72
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Kalidas s/o Kundlik Lomte, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Osmanabad in Sessions Case No. 180 of 2013 for offences under Sections 302 and 324 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for the murder of his wife Sumanbai and causing hurt to his minor son Suraj. The prosecution case was that on 13.06.2012, after returning from work, the appellant quarreled with his wife and assaulted her with an axe and koyta, causing her death. When his son Suraj intervened, the appellant also attacked him, causing injuries on his head, chin, left ear, and left hand. The appellant then locked the house from outside. The minor son managed to escape and informed his uncle and grandparents, leading to the registration of an FIR. The trial court convicted the appellant based on the testimony of the minor son, medical evidence, and other circumstances. The appellant appealed to the Bombay High Court, challenging the conviction. The High Court examined the evidence, particularly the testimony of the minor son (PW1), who was found to be a natural and credible witness. The medical evidence corroborated the injuries. The court held that the prosecution had proved its case beyond reasonable doubt and dismissed the appeal, upholding the conviction and sentence.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Murder - Section 302 IPC - Conviction - Appeal against conviction for murder of wife and causing hurt to son - Minor son's testimony found credible and reliable despite being a child witness - Medical evidence corroborated the ocular testimony - Appeal dismissed (Paras 1-25).

B) Evidence Law - Child Witness - Credibility - Minor son aged 16 years testified about the incident - Court held that his deposition was natural, consistent, and trustworthy - No reason to disbelieve him - Conviction upheld (Paras 10-15).

C) Criminal Law - Attempt to Murder - Section 324 IPC - Hurt by dangerous weapon - Accused assaulted his son with axe and koyta causing injuries - Conviction under Section 324 IPC confirmed (Paras 16-20).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the conviction of the appellant under Sections 302 and 324 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 is sustainable based on the evidence of the minor son and other circumstances.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is dismissed. The conviction and sentence passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Osmanabad in Sessions Case No. 180 of 2013 are confirmed.

Law Points

  • Conviction under Section 302 IPC for murder
  • Section 324 IPC for voluntarily causing hurt by dangerous weapons
  • credibility of child witness
  • dying declaration
  • medical evidence corroborating ocular testimony
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (BOM) (01) 39

Criminal Appeal No. 753 of 2015

2023-02-02

Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi, Abhay S. Waghwase

Mr. Ganesh G. Kore for the appellant, Mr. R. D. Sanap, APP for respondent-State

Kalidas s/o Kundlik Lomte

The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for murder and causing hurt

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought acquittal from conviction under Sections 302 and 324 IPC

Filing Reason

Appellant was convicted for murder of his wife and causing hurt to his son

Previous Decisions

Trial court convicted the appellant on 28.08.2015 in Sessions Case No. 180 of 2013

Issues

Whether the conviction under Section 302 IPC is sustainable based on the evidence of the minor son? Whether the conviction under Section 324 IPC is sustainable?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the minor son's testimony is unreliable and there are contradictions. State argued that the minor son's testimony is credible and corroborated by medical evidence.

Ratio Decidendi

The testimony of a child witness, if found to be natural, consistent, and trustworthy, can be relied upon to base a conviction. Medical evidence corroborating the ocular testimony strengthens the prosecution case.

Judgment Excerpts

The appellant convict for offence under section 302 and 324 of the Indian Penal Code, is questioning the judgment and order of conviction dated 28.08.2015... Minor Suraj who was sleeping with his mother woke up and requested his father to spare his mother but the accused hit minor also on his head, chin, left ear and left hand.

Procedural History

The appellant was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Osmanabad on 28.08.2015 in Sessions Case No. 180 of 2013. He filed Criminal Appeal No. 753 of 2015 before the Bombay High Court, which was heard and dismissed on 02.02.2023.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 302, 324, 307, 504
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Revenue in Income Tax Act Case Involving Cancellation of Trust Registration. Cancellation Under Section 12AA(3) Justified Due to Admission of Bogus Donations and Non-Genuine Activities by the Trust, Violating Its Objects and Mis...
Related Judgement
High Court Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Husband in Dowry Harassment Case — Petitioner Granted Pre-Arrest Bail Subject to Conditions. Court Held That Custodial Interrogation May Not Be Necessary for Investigation Under Sections 498A, 506 IP...