Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Writ Seeking Transfer from Unaided to Aided Wing in Minority Polytechnic College. No legal right to transfer exists as appointments were in unaided posts and no vacancy in aided wing.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD
  • 116
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, Syeda Shahana Firdaus and Zameerudding Farooqui, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, Bench at Aurangabad, seeking a writ of mandamus directing respondent nos. 3 and 4 (Maulana Azad Education Society and the Principal of Kamla Nehru Polytechnic (Pharmacy), Aurangabad) to transfer them from the unaided wing to the aided wing of the college and grant consequential benefits from the date of their respective appointments. The petitioners were appointed as lecturers in the pharmacy department of the polytechnic, which is a minority educational institution. They contended that they were entitled to be absorbed in the aided wing as per government policies. The respondents opposed the petition, arguing that the petitioners were appointed in the unaided wing and there were no vacancies in the aided wing. The court analyzed the facts and legal position, noting that the petitioners did not have a legal right to seek transfer as their appointments were specifically in the unaided posts. The court also considered the rights of minority institutions under Article 30 of the Constitution. The court held that a writ of mandamus cannot be issued to enforce a non-existent right. Consequently, the court dismissed the writ petition and the accompanying civil application. The judgment was delivered by a division bench comprising Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi and S. G. Chapalgaonkar, JJ., with the judgment pronounced on 18th March 2024.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Writ of Mandamus - Right to Transfer - Petitioners sought mandamus to transfer from unaided to aided wing of minority polytechnic college - Court held that no legal right exists for such transfer as appointments were in unaided posts and no vacancy in aided wing - Held that writ of mandamus cannot be issued to enforce a non-existent right (Paras 1-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioners, appointed as lecturers in the unaided wing of a minority polytechnic college, have a legal right to seek transfer to the aided wing and consequential benefits.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is dismissed. Rule discharged. No order as to costs. Civil Application No.377 of 2018 also stands disposed of.

Law Points

  • Article 226 of Constitution of India
  • Writ of Mandamus
  • Transfer of employees from unaided to aided wing
  • Minority educational institution rights
  • No vested right to transfer
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2024 LawText (BOM) (03) 20

WRIT PETITION NO.14956 OF 2017

2024-03-18

Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi, S. G. Chapalgaonkar

2024:BHC-AUG:6125-DB

Mr. S. R. Barlinge for Petitioners, Mr. S. K. Shirse AGP for Respondent Nos.1 and 2, Mr. P. S. Dighe for Respondent Nos.3 and 4, Mr. S. S. Kazi for Respondent No.5, Mr. S. V. Dixit for Applicant in CA

Syeda Shahana Firdaus and Zameerudding Farooqui

The State of Maharashtra, The Director of Technical Education, Maulana Azad Education Society, The Principal of Kamla Nehru Polytechnic (Pharmacy), Aurangabad, and Junaid Kha s/o Sayeed Kha Pathan

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking mandamus for transfer from unaided to aided wing of a minority polytechnic college.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought writ of mandamus directing respondent nos.3 and 4 to transfer them from unaided wing to aided wing of respondent no.4-College and award consequential benefits from date of appointment.

Filing Reason

Petitioners claimed they were entitled to be transferred to aided wing as per government policies.

Issues

Whether the petitioners have a legal right to seek transfer from unaided to aided wing of a minority polytechnic college. Whether a writ of mandamus can be issued to enforce such a right.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued they were appointed as lecturers and should be transferred to aided wing with consequential benefits. Respondents contended petitioners were appointed in unaided wing and no vacancies existed in aided wing; minority institution has rights under Article 30.

Ratio Decidendi

A writ of mandamus cannot be issued to enforce a non-existent right. Petitioners appointed in unaided posts have no legal right to transfer to aided wing, especially in a minority institution where no vacancy exists.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioners have approached this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus against respondent nos.3 and 4 to transfer the petitioners from unaided wing to aided wing of respondent no.4-College and award consequential benefits from the date of their respective appointments.

Procedural History

Writ petition filed in 2017; judgment reserved on 29th February 2024 and pronounced on 18th March 2024.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226, Article 30
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Karnataka High Court Allows Revision Petition, Quashes Summons Against Accused in Dowry Harassment Case Due to Lack of Specific Allegations. The court held that summoning accused without specific allegations in complaint or charge sheet is an abuse o...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Senior Citizens Tribunal Order in Property Dispute Between Mother and Son. Maintenance and Property Rights Under Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 Upheld.