Bombay High Court Allows Teacher's Transfer from Unaided to Aided Section in School Education Case — Approval of Education Officer Not Required for Transfer Within Same School Under Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977. Education Officer's Withdrawal of Approval Without Hearing Set Aside as Arbitrary.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, a Scheduled Caste teacher with qualifications M.A. (English), B.Ed., D.Ed., and MSCIT, was appointed as Assistant Teacher in an unaided school by respondent No.3 and 4 on 27/06/2011. The Education Officer (respondent No.2) granted approval to her appointment. In 2017, two teachers superannuated, creating vacancies in the aided section. The petitioner applied for transfer to those vacancies. The trust passed a resolution on 26/11/2021 transferring her from the unaided to the aided section. She joined duties on 29/11/2021. However, the Education Officer, by order dated 30/11/2021, withdrew the earlier approval granted to her initial appointment and directed the school to recover salary paid. The petitioner challenged this order. The court held that the transfer was within the same school and did not require prior approval of the Education Officer under the MEPS Act and Rules. The court also held that the withdrawal of approval without hearing was arbitrary. The petition was allowed, quashing the impugned order and directing the Education Officer to consider the transfer proposal afresh.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Transfer - Approval - Transfer of teacher from unaided to aided section of same school does not require prior approval of Education Officer under Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 and Rules, 1981 - Held that Rule 12 of the MEPS Rules applies to transfers within same school and approval of Education Officer is not a condition precedent (Paras 6-8).

B) Service Law - Approval - Withdrawal - Approval once granted for initial appointment cannot be withdrawn retrospectively without affording opportunity of hearing - Held that the Education Officer's order withdrawing approval was arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice (Para 9).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether transfer of a teacher from unaided section to aided section of the same school requires prior approval of the Education Officer under the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 and Rules thereunder.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Petition allowed. Impugned order dated 30/11/2021 quashed and set aside. Respondent No.2 directed to consider the transfer proposal afresh in accordance with law within four weeks.

Law Points

  • Transfer within same school from unaided to aided section does not require prior approval of Education Officer
  • Approval once granted for initial appointment cannot be withdrawn retrospectively
  • Rule 12 of Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Rules
  • 1981 applies to transfers within same school
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2024 LawText (BOM) (02) 268

Writ Petition No. 7976 of 2022

2024-02-05

Nitin W. Sambre, Abhay J. Mantri

2024:BHC-NAG:1628-DB

Mr. I.N. Chaudhari for petitioner, Mr. A.M. Ghogre for respondent Nos.1 & 2, Mr. R.M. Wasnik for respondent No.3 and 4

Ku. Omika d/o Wasudeo Shahare

State of Maharashtra, Education Officer (Secondary), Mahatma Jyotiba Fule Shikshan Sanstha, Balasaheb Tirpude High School

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging order of Education Officer withdrawing approval of appointment and refusing to approve transfer.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought quashing of order dated 30/11/2021 and direction to approve her transfer from unaided to aided section.

Filing Reason

Education Officer withdrew approval of petitioner's initial appointment and refused to approve her transfer to aided section.

Previous Decisions

Education Officer granted approval to initial appointment on 27/06/2011; trust passed resolution for transfer on 26/11/2021; Education Officer withdrew approval on 30/11/2021.

Issues

Whether transfer of teacher from unaided to aided section of same school requires prior approval of Education Officer? Whether withdrawal of approval without hearing is valid?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that transfer within same school does not require approval under MEPS Act and Rules. Respondent argued that transfer to aided post requires approval as it involves grant-in-aid.

Ratio Decidendi

Transfer of a teacher from unaided to aided section of the same school is governed by Rule 12 of the MEPS Rules, 1981, and does not require prior approval of the Education Officer. Withdrawal of approval already granted without affording opportunity of hearing is arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice.

Judgment Excerpts

Rule 12 of the MEPS Rules, 1981, deals with transfer of an employee from one school to another school or from one section to another section of the same school. The approval of the Education Officer is not a condition precedent for transfer within the same school. The order withdrawing approval without hearing the petitioner is arbitrary.

Procedural History

Petitioner appointed as Assistant Teacher on 27/06/2011 with approval. On 26/11/2021, trust resolved to transfer her to aided section. She joined on 29/11/2021. On 30/11/2021, Education Officer withdrew approval and directed recovery. Petitioner filed writ petition on 2022. Heard and decided on 05/02/2024.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977:
  • Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Rules, 1981: Rule 12
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds NEET-UG 2024 Exam Integrity, Finds No Systemic Leak or Malpractice. Court dismisses petitions for re-test, holding that isolated irregularities do not warrant cancellation of the entire examination under Article 226 of the Const...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Teacher's Transfer from Unaided to Aided Section in School Education Case — Approval of Education Officer Not Required for Transfer Within Same School Under Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) R...