Bombay High Court Quashes Scrutiny Committee Order Invalidating Thakur Tribe Claim — Cites Failure to Consider Valid Certificate of Paternal Uncle and Affidavit of Genealogy. The Court remitted the matter for fresh consideration, directing the Committee to evaluate all evidence including prior validity certificates and genealogy.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Chaitanya Satish Dervre, challenged the order dated 04.10.2019 passed by the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Aurangabad, which invalidated his tribe claim for 'Thakur' Scheduled Tribe. The petitioner had obtained a caste certificate dated 15.09.2015 from the competent authority and secured admission to B. Pharm course in the academic year 2016-17 under the scheduled tribe category. He submitted an undertaking to produce caste validity. The Committee forwarded the claim for verification along with documentary evidence including school records of the petitioner, his father, grandfather, cousin grandfather, and a validity certificate dated 07.10.2005 issued in favour of his real paternal uncle, Ajai Adhar Deore. An affidavit in Nanuma No.-F showing genealogy was also tendered. The Vigilance Officer conducted an inquiry and submitted a report dated 08.05.2019. The petitioner filed a reply on 05.06.2019. However, the Committee invalidated the claim observing that the petitioner failed to support his claim by documentary evidence and during the affinity test towards the 'Thakur' community, and that his place of residence was beyond the tribe area. The petitioner contended that the Committee did not consider the validity certificate of his paternal uncle and the genealogy affidavit. The Court found that the Committee had not considered these relevant documents and remitted the matter back to the Committee for fresh consideration, directing the petitioner to appear before the Committee on 15.01.2024 and the Committee to decide the matter within three months thereafter.

Headnote

A) Scheduled Tribes - Caste Validity - Affinity Test - The Scrutiny Committee invalidated the petitioner's tribe claim for 'Thakur' Scheduled Tribe on grounds of failure to pass affinity test and place of residence beyond tribe area - The Court held that the Committee failed to consider the validity certificate issued in favour of the petitioner's real paternal uncle and the affidavit of genealogy, which are relevant pieces of evidence - The matter was remitted back to the Committee for fresh consideration (Paras 1-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee was justified in invalidating the petitioner's tribe claim for 'Thakur' Scheduled Tribe despite the existence of a validity certificate issued in favour of the petitioner's real paternal uncle and other documentary evidence.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Court quashed and set aside the impugned order dated 04.10.2019 and remitted the matter back to the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Aurangabad, for fresh consideration. The petitioner was directed to appear before the Committee on 15.01.2024. The Committee was directed to decide the matter within three months from the date of appearance.

Law Points

  • Scheduled Tribe certificate validity
  • affinity test
  • consideration of prior validity certificates
  • burden of proof
  • natural justice
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2024 LawText (BOM) (01) 84

WRIT PETITION NO. 12574 OF 2019

2024-01-03

Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi, S.G. Chapalgaonkar

2024:BHC-AUG:350-DB

Mr. S.C. Yeramwar (Petitioner), Mr. S.K. Shirse (AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 & 2/State), Mr. A.P. Nikam (Respondent No. 3)

Chaitanya s/o Satish Dervre

The State of Maharashtra, The Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Aurangabad Division, Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University, Aurangabad, Rajesh Bhaiyya Tope College of B. Pharmacy, Nipani, Aurangabad

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging the order of the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee invalidating the petitioner's tribe claim for 'Thakur' Scheduled Tribe.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of the impugned order dated 04.10.2019 and direction to the Committee to reconsider the tribe claim.

Filing Reason

The petitioner's tribe claim for 'Thakur' Scheduled Tribe was invalidated by the Committee despite documentary evidence including a validity certificate of his real paternal uncle.

Previous Decisions

The Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Aurangabad, passed an order dated 04.10.2019 invalidating the petitioner's tribe claim.

Issues

Whether the Scrutiny Committee erred in invalidating the tribe claim without considering the validity certificate of the petitioner's real paternal uncle and the affidavit of genealogy.

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioner argued that the Committee did not consider the validity certificate issued in favour of his real paternal uncle, Ajai Adhar Deore, dated 07.10.2005, and the affidavit in Nanuma No.-F showing genealogy.

Ratio Decidendi

The Scrutiny Committee must consider all relevant documentary evidence, including validity certificates of close relatives and affidavits of genealogy, before invalidating a tribe claim. Failure to do so renders the order unsustainable.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner impugns the order dated 04.10.2019 passed by the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Aurangabad, thereby invalidating the tribe claim of the petitioner for 'Thakur' Scheduled Tribe. The Committee invalidated the tribe claim of the petitioner vide the impugned order observing that the petitioner failed to support his claim by documentary evidence and during affinity test towards the 'Thakur' community.

Procedural History

The petitioner obtained a caste certificate on 15.09.2015 and got admission to B. Pharm course in 2016-17 under scheduled tribe category. The tribe claim was forwarded to the Scrutiny Committee for verification. The Vigilance Officer submitted a report on 08.05.2019. The petitioner filed a reply on 05.06.2019. The Committee passed the impugned order on 04.10.2019 invalidating the claim. The petitioner filed the present writ petition challenging the order.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Records Non-Deposit in Commercial Summary Suit; Defendant Failed to Deposit Despite Supreme Court Extension
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Scrutiny Committee Order Invalidating Thakur Tribe Claim — Cites Failure to Consider Valid Certificate of Paternal Uncle and Affidavit of Genealogy. The Court remitted the matter for fresh consideration, directing the Comm...