Bombay High Court Allows Wife's Petition for Further Investigation in Domestic Violence Case — Magistrate Erred in Rejecting Section 173(8) CrPC Application Without Considering Need for Fair Trial. The court held that the Magistrate has the power to order further investigation under Section 173(8) CrPC even after charge-sheet is filed, and the rejection without considering the necessity for further investigation was erroneous.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Prosecution
  • 14
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Sau. Mala W/o. Rahul Varma, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, challenging the order dated 19/10/2024 passed by the Learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, (M.V.) Court, Nagpur, in R.C.C. No.2216/2022. The Magistrate had rejected the petitioner's application under Section 173(8) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking further investigation. The petitioner is the legally wedded wife of Rahul Surajprasad Varma, and their marriage was solemnized in 2011. They have two children. A dispute arose between the husband and wife, leading to certain proceedings. It was alleged that on 11/04/2022 at about 06:00 p.m., the husband entered the petitioner's house by breaking the lock, cut the wires of the fridge and cooler, and scattered household articles. When the petitioner returned home at about 09:30 p.m., she found the damage. Based on these allegations, a written complaint was filed on 12/04/2022, and on 14/04/2022, FIR No.230/2022 was registered with Hudkeshwar Police Station. After investigation, a charge-sheet was filed on 19/05/2022, resulting in R.C.C. No.2216/2022. The petitioner filed an application under Section 173(8) CrPC for further investigation, which was rejected by the Magistrate. The High Court held that the Magistrate has the power to order further investigation even after charge-sheet is filed, if the interests of justice and fair trial so require. The court observed that the investigation appeared to be perfunctory and that the Magistrate's order was cryptic and did not consider the necessity for further investigation. The court set aside the impugned order and remitted the matter to the Magistrate for fresh consideration, directing the Magistrate to decide the application afresh within four weeks from the date of receipt of the order. The petition was allowed.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Further Investigation - Section 173(8) CrPC - Power of Magistrate - The Magistrate has the power to order further investigation even after charge-sheet is filed, if the interests of justice and fair trial so require. The rejection of such application without considering the necessity for further investigation to bring out the truth is erroneous. (Paras 2-6)

B) Matrimonial Dispute - Domestic Violence - FIR - Investigation - In a case where the wife alleged that her husband broke into her house and damaged property, the investigation was conducted in a perfunctory manner. The Magistrate's rejection of the application for further investigation under Section 173(8) CrPC was set aside, and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration. (Paras 3-6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Magistrate was justified in rejecting the petitioner's application under Section 173(8) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking further investigation in a case arising from a matrimonial dispute.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court allowed the petition, set aside the impugned order dated 19/10/2024 passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Nagpur, and remitted the matter to the Magistrate for fresh consideration of the application under Section 173(8) CrPC. The Magistrate was directed to decide the application afresh within four weeks from the date of receipt of the order.

Law Points

  • Section 173(8) CrPC
  • further investigation
  • power of Magistrate
  • fair trial
  • domestic violence
  • matrimonial dispute
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (BOM) (09) 195

Criminal Writ Petition No. 696 of 2025

2025-09-09

M.M. Nerlikar

2025:BHC-NAG:8838

Mr. P.V. Dandwate for the Petitioner, Mr. S.S. Hulke, A.P.P. for the Respondents/State

Sau. Mala W/o. Rahul Varma

The Hon'ble Commissioner of Police, Nagpur City, Nagpur; The Hon'ble Deputy Commissioner of Police, Sakkardara Lake, Nagpur; The Police Station Officer, Police Station Hudkeshwar, Nagpur

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal Writ Petition challenging the rejection of an application under Section 173(8) CrPC for further investigation in a matrimonial dispute case.

Remedy Sought

The petitioner sought to set aside the order dated 19/10/2024 passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Nagpur, rejecting her application for further investigation under Section 173(8) CrPC, and to direct further investigation.

Filing Reason

The petitioner alleged that the investigation in FIR No.230/2022 was perfunctory and that further investigation was necessary to bring out the truth and ensure a fair trial.

Previous Decisions

The Magistrate rejected the application under Section 173(8) CrPC on 19/10/2024 in R.C.C. No.2216/2022.

Issues

Whether the Magistrate was justified in rejecting the application under Section 173(8) CrPC without considering the necessity for further investigation. Whether the power to order further investigation under Section 173(8) CrPC can be exercised even after charge-sheet is filed.

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioner argued that the investigation was perfunctory and that further investigation was necessary to bring out the truth and ensure a fair trial. The respondents/State opposed the petition, but the court noted that the learned A.P.P. waived service and the petition was taken up for final hearing with consent.

Ratio Decidendi

The Magistrate has the power under Section 173(8) CrPC to order further investigation even after the charge-sheet is filed, if the interests of justice and fair trial so require. The rejection of such an application without considering the necessity for further investigation is erroneous and liable to be set aside.

Judgment Excerpts

The present Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging the order dated 19/10/2024 in R.C.C. No.2216/2022 passed by Learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, (M.V.) Court, Nagpur, wherein, the application of the petitioner filed under Section 173(8) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, was rejected by the learned judge. The Magistrate has the power to order further investigation even after charge-sheet is filed, if the interests of justice and fair trial so require. The impugned order is cryptic and does not consider the necessity for further investigation. Hence, the order is set aside and the matter is remitted to the Magistrate for fresh consideration.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a written complaint on 12/04/2022, leading to FIR No.230/2022 on 14/04/2022. Charge-sheet was filed on 19/05/2022, resulting in R.C.C. No.2216/2022. The petitioner filed an application under Section 173(8) CrPC for further investigation, which was rejected by the Magistrate on 19/10/2024. The petitioner then filed the present Criminal Writ Petition before the High Court on an unspecified date, which was allowed on 09/09/2025.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 173(8)
  • Constitution of India: 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Wife's Petition for Further Investigation in Domestic Violence Case — Magistrate Erred in Rejecting Section 173(8) CrPC Application Without Considering Need for Fair Trial. The court held that the Magistrate has the power t...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Senior Citizen Father Seeking Maintenance from Children Under Senior Citizens Act. Maintenance Order Set Aside Due to Non-Compliance with Section 4(2) Requiring Consideration of Children's Financial Capacity.