Bombay High Court Allows Teachers' Petitions for Salary Revision Under 7th Pay Commission — Directs State to Treat Petitioners as Government Aided School Teachers for Pay Fixation. Teachers in Private Aided Schools Entitled to Same Pay Scales as Government School Teachers Under Article 14 and Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools Act.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Bombay High Court disposed of two writ petitions filed by teachers Sagar Dattatray Chorghe and Sangeeta Ramchandra Salunke, who were employed in private aided schools (Navin Marathi Shala) run by Maharashi Karve Stree Shikshan Sanstha. The petitioners sought directions to the State of Maharashtra and other respondents to revise their salaries in accordance with the 7th Pay Commission recommendations, which had been implemented for government school teachers but not for teachers in aided schools. The court noted that the petitioners were qualified teachers and their schools were recognized and aided by the government. The State argued that the petitioners were not government employees and that the 7th Pay Commission was not applicable to aided schools. However, the court held that under the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977, and the principle of equal pay for equal work, teachers in aided schools are entitled to parity in pay scales with government school teachers. The court directed the State to treat the petitioners as government aided school teachers for the purpose of pay fixation and to revise their salaries accordingly within three months. The court also clarified that the National Council for Teachers Education (NCTE) regulations did not bar such revision. The petitions were disposed of with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Pay Revision - Government Aided Schools - Teachers in private aided schools are entitled to pay scales and benefits as per 7th Pay Commission recommendations applicable to government school teachers, as per the principle of equal pay for equal work and the provisions of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977. (Paras 1-22)

B) Constitutional Law - Right to Equality - Article 14 - Discrimination - Denial of revised pay scales to teachers in aided schools while granting them to government school teachers violates Article 14 of the Constitution of India. (Paras 10-15)

C) Education Law - National Council for Teachers Education (NCTE) - Role - NCTE regulations prescribing qualifications for teachers do not bar the application of pay revision benefits to teachers in aided schools. (Paras 16-18)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether teachers employed in private aided schools are entitled to the same pay scales and benefits as teachers in government schools, particularly with reference to the 7th Pay Commission recommendations.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the petitions and directed the State of Maharashtra to treat the petitioners as government aided school teachers for the purpose of pay fixation and to revise their salaries in accordance with the 7th Pay Commission recommendations within three months. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Pay revision
  • government aided schools
  • 7th Pay Commission
  • parity in pay scales
  • right to equal pay for equal work
  • Article 14
  • Article 21
  • Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act
  • 1977
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (BOM) (09) 163

Writ Petition No. 7943 of 2024 and Writ Petition No. 861 of 2025

2025-09-11

2025:BHC-AS:37938-DB

Mr. Suresh S. Pakale, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. Saurabh Pakale i/by Ms. Padmaja Malgaonkar, Advocate for the Petitioners; Mr. Rui Rodrigues a/w Ms. Naveen Kumari, Ms. Aparna Rajeshwari S., Advocate for Respondent No.2/UOI; Mr. Sandeep Waghmare, Advocate for Respondent Nos.7 & 8 in WP/7943/2024 & Respondent Nos.8 & 9 in WP/861/2025; Mr. V.G. Badgujar, AGP for the Respondent/State; Mr. Ashok Misa

Sagar Dattatray Chorghe and Sangeeta Ramchandra Salunke

The State of Maharashtra, The Union of India, The National Council for Teachers Education, The Director of Education, The Deputy Director of Education, The Education Officer (Primary), The President of Maharashi Karve Stree Shikshan Sanstha, The Principal of Navin Marathi Shala, and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions seeking directions for salary revision under 7th Pay Commission for teachers in private aided schools.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought directions to the State and other respondents to revise their salaries in accordance with the 7th Pay Commission recommendations.

Filing Reason

Petitioners, teachers in private aided schools, were not granted the revised pay scales under the 7th Pay Commission which were given to government school teachers.

Issues

Whether teachers in private aided schools are entitled to the same pay scales as government school teachers under the 7th Pay Commission? Whether denial of revised pay scales to teachers in aided schools violates Article 14 of the Constitution?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that they are qualified teachers and their schools are aided by the government, hence they are entitled to parity in pay scales with government school teachers under the principle of equal pay for equal work. Respondents (State) argued that the petitioners are not government employees and the 7th Pay Commission is not applicable to aided schools.

Ratio Decidendi

Teachers in private aided schools are entitled to the same pay scales and benefits as teachers in government schools under the principle of equal pay for equal work and the provisions of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977. Denial of such benefits violates Article 14 of the Constitution.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioners are teachers in private aided schools and are entitled to the same pay scales as government school teachers under the 7th Pay Commission. Denial of revised pay scales to teachers in aided schools while granting them to government school teachers violates Article 14 of the Constitution.

Procedural History

The petitioners filed writ petitions before the Bombay High Court seeking directions for salary revision under the 7th Pay Commission. The court heard the matter and disposed of the petitions with directions.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977:
  • Constitution of India: Article 14, Article 21
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Teachers' Petitions for Salary Revision Under 7th Pay Commission — Directs State to Treat Petitioners as Government Aided School Teachers for Pay Fixation. Teachers in Private Aided Schools Entitled to Same Pay Scales as Go...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Maintenance Order Under DV Act — Foreign Divorce Decree Does Not Bar Domestic Violence Proceedings. The court upheld the magistrate's order granting maintenance and right to residence to the wife under S...