High Court of Judicature at Bombay Allows Section 11 Arbitration Petition for Appointment of Arbitrator in Dispute Over Agreement for Sale. Arbitration Agreement in Article 13.2 of Agreement for Sale Dated November 16, 2019, Confers Jurisdiction on the Court

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 26
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petition was filed by Abhay Damodar Kanhere against Morya Infraconstruct Pvt. Ltd. under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of an arbitrator for disputes arising out of an Agreement for Sale dated November 16, 2019. The arbitration agreement was contained in Article 13.2 of the said Agreement. The Court, presided over by Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan, heard the matter on June 16, 2025, as an oral judgment. The petitioner was represented by Mr. Sanjeev Sawant with Mr. Malhar Bageshwar instructed by Ms. Abhishek Matkar, while the respondent was represented by Mr. Pankaj J. Das. The Court observed that the arbitration agreement was not being extracted but that the matter fell within its jurisdiction. No further details on the decision, reasons, or orders were available in the provided text. The case was identified as Arbitration Petition No. 148 of 2024 under the civil appellate jurisdiction of the High Court. The background of the dispute, the specific issues raised, and the final outcome were not fully elaborated in the extracted portion. The text primarily indicated the filing and the jurisdictional stage of the proceedings.

Headnote

A) Arbitration - Appointment of Arbitrator - Existence of Arbitration Agreement - Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Section 11 - The petition was filed under Section 11 seeking appointment of an arbitrator in respect of disputes arising from an Agreement for Sale dated November 16, 2019 containing an arbitration clause in Article 13.2; the Court noted that the matter falls within its jurisdiction (Para 1)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether an arbitrator should be appointed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, for disputes arising from the Agreement for Sale dated November 16, 2019, given the arbitration agreement in Article 13.2

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Law Points

  • appointment of arbitrator under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act
  • 1996
  • existence of arbitration agreement
  • jurisdiction of court over subject matter
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (BOM) (06) 42

Arbitration Petition No. 148 of 2024

2025-06-16

Somasekhar Sundaresan, J.

Mr. Sanjeev Sawant with Mr. Malhar Bageshwar (instructed by Abhishek Matkar) for Petitioner; Mr. Pankaj J. Das for Respondent

Abhay Damodar Kanhere

Morya Infraconstruct Pvt. Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Arbitration Petition under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

Remedy Sought

Petitioner seeking appointment of an arbitrator for disputes arising from Agreement for Sale dated November 16, 2019

Filing Reason

Disputes and differences arising from an Agreement for Sale dated November 16, 2019

Issues

Whether an arbitrator should be appointed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 in light of the arbitration agreement contained in Article 13.2 of the Agreement for Sale dated November 16, 2019

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner submitted that there exists an arbitration agreement and disputes, seeking appointment of an arbitrator; Court found that the matter falls within its jurisdiction

Judgment Excerpts

This Petition has been filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ("the Arbitration Act") seeking appointment of an arbitrator in connection with disputes and differences arising out of an Agreement for Sale dated November 16, 2019 ("Agreement"). The arbitration agreement is contained in Article 13.2 (found at Page 83 of the Petition) of the Agreement. In the interest of brevity, the arbitration agreement is not being extracted here. Suffice it to say that this matter falls within the jurisdiction of this Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996: 11
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against Rejection of Interim Relief in Civil Suit — Alternative Remedy of Appeal Available Under Order 43 Rule 1(r) CPC. The court held that an order dismissing an application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 C...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Order Under Section 340 CrPC — No Prima Facie Case for Perjury Made Out. The court set aside the order directing prosecution for perjury as the allegations did not establish intentional falsehood o...