High Court of Judicature at Bombay Adjudicates Appeal from Notice of Motion in Suit Involving Minors and Cooperative Housing Society. No Verdict Details Available as Judgment Text is Truncated.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 103
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

APPEAL NO.557 OF 2007

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (BOM) (06) 33

Appeal No. 557 of 2007 in Notice of Motion No. 3907 of 2005 in Suit No. 3325 of 2005

2025-06-23

2025:BHC-OS:9150-DB

Rohit s/o Pramod Chavan and Mitesh s/o Pramod Chavan, both minors, through their natural guardian Neeta Pramod Chavan

1. Pramod Jayawant Chavan, 2. (a) Mrs Sheetal Sudhakar Chavan (b) Rekhi Sudhakar Chavan (c) Ashwin Sudhakar Chavan, 3. Tukaram Jaywant Chavan, 4. Mrs Usha Shashikant Hadkar, 5. Mrs Sanjivani Janardan Upare, 6. Mrs Smita Sanjay Daundkar, 7. Mrs Chhaya Digambar Naik, 8. Dyandeep Co-Op Credit Society Limited, 9. The Hindustan Co-op Bank Ltd., 10. Yeshomandir Sahakari Pathpedi Maryadit, 11. The Mumbai District Central Co.Op. Bank Ltd., 12. The Mahanagar Co-op Hsg. Ltd., 13. Vishal Junnar Sahakari Patpedhi, Maryadit, 14. Suresh Bhanwarlal Jain, 15. Canara Bank, 16. The Rohini Co-op. Hsg. Soc. Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal from interlocutory order in civil suit

Procedural History

Appeal No. 557 of 2007 filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay against an order passed in Notice of Motion No. 3907 of 2005 in Suit No. 3325 of 2005.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Employees Union Appeal Against Management of Assam Industrial Development Corporation — No Employment Relationship Established.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Decision on Will Validity in Partition Dispute — Insufficient Evidence of Execution. The court found that the will was not validly executed as the attesting witnesses were not examined, failing to meet statutory requirements f...