Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Adjudicates Appeal from Notice of Motion in Suit Involving Minors and Cooperative Housing Society. No Verdict Details Available as Judgment Text is Truncated.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
Admin
2026-09-02 08:22:11
  • 95
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

APPEAL NO.557 OF 2007

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (BOM) (06) 33

Appeal No. 557 of 2007 in Notice of Motion No. 3907 of 2005 in Suit No. 3325 of 2005

2025-06-23

2025:BHC-OS:9150-DB

Rohit s/o Pramod Chavan and Mitesh s/o Pramod Chavan, both minors, through their natural guardian Neeta Pramod Chavan

1. Pramod Jayawant Chavan, 2. (a) Mrs Sheetal Sudhakar Chavan (b) Rekhi Sudhakar Chavan (c) Ashwin Sudhakar Chavan, 3. Tukaram Jaywant Chavan, 4. Mrs Usha Shashikant Hadkar, 5. Mrs Sanjivani Janardan Upare, 6. Mrs Smita Sanjay Daundkar, 7. Mrs Chhaya Digambar Naik, 8. Dyandeep Co-Op Credit Society Limited, 9. The Hindustan Co-op Bank Ltd., 10. Yeshomandir Sahakari Pathpedi Maryadit, 11. The Mumbai District Central Co.Op. Bank Ltd., 12. The Mahanagar Co-op Hsg. Ltd., 13. Vishal Junnar Sahakari Patpedhi, Maryadit, 14. Suresh Bhanwarlal Jain, 15. Canara Bank, 16. The Rohini Co-op. Hsg. Soc. Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal from interlocutory order in civil suit

Procedural History

Appeal No. 557 of 2007 filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay against an order passed in Notice of Motion No. 3907 of 2005 in Suit No. 3325 of 2005.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Tags :
minors natural guardian cooperative society notice of motion appeal

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Development Charges Under U.P. Urban Planning Act, Quashes Other Levies as Unauthorized. The Court holds that only development fees under Section 15(2-A) are valid, while inspection fee, sub-division charges, stacking charges, a... 2026-09-14 15:14:18
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes Passport Authority's Show Cause Notice for Renewal — Petitioner's Right to Passport Upheld Despite Pending Criminal Proceedings. Passport Renewal Cannot Be Denied Solely on Ground of Pendency of Criminal Case Without... 2026-09-14 15:14:13
Categories
Popular Tags
writ petition Natural Justice acquittal murder compensation burden of proof limitation Article 226 benefit of doubt land acquisition
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

Bombay High Court Dismisses MBBS Student's Writ Petition Seeking Fourth Attempt in Anatomy...

High Court of Bombay Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Tenancy Orders Under Bombay Tenancy ...

Supreme Court Acquits Appellant in Prevention of Corruption Act Case Due to Absence of Pec...

Supreme Court Modifies High Court Order Appointing Different Arbitrator Under Section 11 o...

Supreme Court Upholds Scrutiny Committee Invalidation of Scheduled Tribe Caste Claim but P...

Supreme Court Allows Homebuyers' Appeal and Waives Time Extension Charges Imposed by Devel...

Supreme Court Dismisses Insurer's and Claimant's Appeals in Motor Accident Death Compensat...

Lost Your Password?