High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Hears Criminal Appeals Against Conviction Under Indian Penal Code. The Appeals Seek to Set Aside Conviction Recorded by Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No. 22/2015 for Offences Under Various Sections of IPC.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: GOA
  • 7
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, heard four criminal appeals filed by five convicts challenging their conviction and sentence imposed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Chandrapur in Sessions Case No. 22/2015. The appeals were clubbed together and decided by a Division Bench comprising Justices Nitin B. Suryawanshi and M. W. Chandwani. The appellants were represented by a team of advocates, while the State was represented by the Additional Public Prosecutor. The judgment was reserved on 28 April 2025 and pronounced on 6 May 2025. The extracts of the judgment do not contain the factual background, charges, evidence, or the court's detailed reasoning; therefore, the specific grounds of appeal and the ultimate decision remain unknown from the provided text. The High Court’s role was to review the trial court’s verdict for any legal or factual errors that would warrant interference with the conviction under the Indian Penal Code, 1860. Given the absence of substantive content beyond the case header, no further details of the court’s analysis or the final order can be summarized.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Appeal Against Conviction - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - The appeals challenge the conviction and sentence recorded by the Additional Sessions Judge, Chandrapur in Sessions Case No. 22/2015. The High Court examines the legality and propriety of the conviction based on the record and arguments. (Paras Not Mentioned).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the conviction and sentence imposed on the appellants by the Additional Sessions Judge is legally valid and supported by evidence

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Law Points

  • appeals against conviction under IPC
  • challenge to trial court judgment
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (BOM) (05) 60

Criminal Appeal Nos. 336/2016, 352/2016, 325/2016 & 346/2016

2025-05-06

Nitin B. Suryawanshi, M. W. Chandwani

2025:BHC-NAG:4873-DB

R. K. Tiwari, Arjun V. Bobde, Shubhangi Jadhao, R. R. Vyas, R. M. Daga, S. S. Doifode

Maksud Sheikh Gaffur Sheikh, Sheikh Kadir Sheikh Jakir, Wasim Khan S/o Ajim Khan, Jobi Ashokan Welythan, Sirajkhan Pathan @ Raja S/o Shahadat Khan Pathan

State of Maharashtra through Police Station Officer, Ramnagar Police Station, Chandrapur

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction under Indian Penal Code, 1860

Remedy Sought

Appellants seek to set aside the conviction and sentence imposed by the trial court

Previous Decisions

Conviction by Additional Sessions Judge, Chandrapur in Sessions Case No. 22/2015

Procedural History

The Additional Sessions Judge, Chandrapur convicted the appellants in Sessions Case No. 22/2015. The convicts filed separate criminal appeals before the High Court. The appeals were clubbed together and heard by a Division Bench.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Hears Criminal Appeals Against Conviction Under Indian Penal Code. The Appeals Seek to Set Aside Conviction Recorded by Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No. 22/2015 for Offences Under Various Sections of IPC.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Execution Application for Sale of Partnership Property in Execution of Money Decree. Court holds that decree holder can attach and sell judgment debtor's interest in partnership assets without impleading the partnership firm ...