High Court of Bombay Hears Writ Petition Filed by 15 Petitioners in Unknown Subject Matter — No Verdict Available. Petitioners, Occupants of Various Rooms, Approach Court for Relief — Cause of Action and Outcome Not Provided in Extract.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 128
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The High Court of Bombay, exercising its Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction, heard a writ petition filed by fifteen petitioners. The petitioners, whose names and room numbers are listed in the cause title, approached the court for relief, but the precise nature of the grievance, the legal provisions invoked, and the facts leading to the filing remain undisclosed in the provided extract. No respondent is identified, and the record contains no further information regarding the claims, arguments, or the court's analysis. Consequently, the background, material facts, legal issues, contentions, and the court's reasoning and decision cannot be ascertained from the limited text available.

Issue of Consideration

WRIT PETITION (L) NO.7193 OF 2024

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (BOM) (05) 46

WP(L) No. 7193 of 2024

2025-05-09

2025:BHC-OS:7865-DB

Dilip Gopal Pewekar, Mangala Satyvan Vinarkar, Ganesh Bhiku Devlekar, Vaishali Vinayak Kadwadkar, Vinaya Waman Jalgaonkar, Makarand Mohan Padhe, Nanuben Shantilal Boricha, Sudhir Bhikaji Deolekar, Vaishali Manoj Nagaonkar, Arvind B. Panchal, Mardav Makarand Padhye, Prashant H. Mehta, Snehal Santosh Humbre, Prashant Rajaram Chiplunkar, Sandeep Nathuram Nagaonkar

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute, Upholding Concurrent Findings on Title and Adverse Possession. Suit for Possession Based on Title Held Not Barred by Limitation Under Articles 66 and 67 of Limitation Act, 1963.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeals in TDS Dispute with MMRDA. Court holds that payments made by MMRDA to contractors for construction of metro rail project are not subject to TDS under Section 194C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 as the contract...