High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Writ Petition Seeking Certiorari Against Panvel Municipal Corporation. Petition Prays for Writ of Certiorari and Other Reliefs Without Specifying Statutory Provisions.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Makarand Vijay Pujari, aged 27 years, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a writ of certiorari against the State of Maharashtra, the Commissioner and Deputy Commissioner of Panvel Municipal Corporation, and one other respondent. The petition was heard by a Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay comprising Justices Ravindra V. Ghuge and Ashwin D. Bhobe. The petitioner was represented by Senior Advocate Vinayak Hon along with Suraj Gadkari, while the State appeared through Additional Government Pleader P. P. Kakade and AGP Nisha Mehra, and the Corporation through Advocate S. V. Gavand. Rule was issued and made returnable forthwith, and the matter was heard finally by consent of parties. The petitioner sought issuance of a writ of certiorari (Prayer Clause B) and other reliefs (Prayer Clause C). The judgment was reserved on 11 March 2025 and pronounced on 2 April 2025. Further details of the factual background, legal issues, arguments, and decision are not available from the provided excerpt.

Issue of Consideration

WRIT PETITION NO. 19518 OF 2024

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (BOM) (04) 143

Writ Petition No. 19518 of 2024

2025-04-02

Ravindra V. Ghuge, Ashwin D. Bhobe

2025:BHC-AS:15186-DB

Mr. Vinayak Hon, Senior Advocate with Mr. Suraj Gadkari for Petitioner; Mr. P.P. Kakade, Additional Government Pleader with Ms. Nisha Mehra, AGP for State; Mr. S.V. Gavand for Respondents/Corporation

Makarand Vijay Pujari

State of Maharashtra, Commissioner Panvel Municipal Corporation, Deputy Commissioner Panvel Municipal Corporation, Ratnamala Kantu Pawar

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition for certiorari

Remedy Sought

Petitioner seeks writ of certiorari (Prayer Clause B) and other reliefs (Prayer Clause C)

Judgment Excerpts

Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally by the consent of the parties. The Petitioner has put forth Prayer Clauses (B) and (C), as under :- Issue a writ of certiorari or writ in the like nature and

Procedural History

Rule issued and made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of parties. Reserved on 11 March 2025. Pronounced on 2 April 2025.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Remands Income Tax Appeal to High Court for Non-Compliance with Section 260A(3) of Income Tax Act, 1961. High Court Failed to Frame Substantial Questions of Law as Mandated, Rendering Its Judgment Unsustainable.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Writ Petition Seeking Certiorari Against Panvel Municipal Corporation. Petition Prays for Writ of Certiorari and Other Reliefs Without Specifying Statutory Provisions.