Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Pronounces Judgment in Land Acquisition Matter — The Court's Decision and Reasoning Are Not Specified in the Provided Text.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
Admin
2026-09-02 20:53:53
  • 82
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

WRIT PETITION NO. 7224 OF 2022

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (BOM) (04) 131

Writ Petition No. 7224 of 2022

2025-04-30

2025:BHC-AS:19680-DB

M/s. Manidhari Realtors Private Limited and M/s. Heriyitage Ashcon Properties

Union of India, Ministry of Road, Transport and Highways; Additional Deputy Collector & Land Acquisition Officer (Unit – 1 – N.H.150E); The Collector, Solapur; National Highway Authority of India

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Judgment Excerpts

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 7224 OF 2022

Procedural History

The petitioners, a private limited company and a partnership firm, filed Writ Petition No. 7224 of 2022 before the Bombay High Court, challenging a land acquisition proceeding concerning National Highway 150E, involving the Union of India, Land Acquisition Officer, District Collector, and National Highway Authority of India. The petition was heard by a Division Bench, and judgment was uploaded on 30 April 2025. No further procedural details are available in the provided text.

Acts & Sections

  • Companies Act, 1956:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Tags :
Writ Petition Land Acquisition National Highway NHAI Solapur Manidhari Realtors Heriyitage Ashcon Properties

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Sets Aside Interim Stay in Public Procurement Contract, Emphasizes Public Interest Over Interim Orders in Tender Matters. The Court held that the High Court's interim order restraining the signing of a contract after completion of biddi... 2026-09-12 13:28:56
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Licensee's Appeal in Electricity Billing Dispute — Holds Additional Demand Time-Barred for Disconnection Under Section 56(2) of Electricity Act, 2003. The two-year limitation for disconnection runs from the date of the origi... 2026-09-12 13:28:55
Categories
Popular Tags
writ petition Natural Justice acquittal murder compensation burden of proof limitation Article 226 benefit of doubt judgment
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

Bombay High Court Dismisses MBBS Student's Writ Petition Seeking Fourth Attempt in Anatomy...

High Court of Bombay Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Tenancy Orders Under Bombay Tenancy ...

Supreme Court Acquits Appellant in Prevention of Corruption Act Case Due to Absence of Pec...

Supreme Court Modifies High Court Order Appointing Different Arbitrator Under Section 11 o...

Supreme Court Upholds Scrutiny Committee Invalidation of Scheduled Tribe Caste Claim but P...

Supreme Court Allows Homebuyers' Appeal and Waives Time Extension Charges Imposed by Devel...

Supreme Court Dismisses Insurer's and Claimant's Appeals in Motor Accident Death Compensat...

Lost Your Password?