Supreme Court Addresses Allegations of Corrupt Practices in Election Petition Under Representation of People Act, 1951. The Case Examines Whether Distribution of Dummy Ballot Papers Omitting Candidate's Symbol and Government Benefits Constitute Corrupt Practices Under Section 123.

  • 7
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal arose from an election petition filed by an unsuccessful candidate challenging the election of the returned candidate, who contested as a Congress nominee for a parliamentary constituency. The election petition alleged multiple corrupt practices under Section 123 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951. The first accusation involved the state government, in which the Congress party held power, issuing an ordinance shortly before the election granting exemption from land revenue to certain agricultural holdings. The opposition parties initiated a campaign that the exemption was temporary and aimed at land forfeiture; the Chief Minister refuted this and urged voters to support the Congress. The second allegation was that on the eve of the election, the Chief Minister announced an increase in dearness allowance to certain government employees. The third allegation was that the respondent or his agents distributed dummy ballot papers which displayed the respondent’s name and election symbol but omitted the appellant’s symbol, thereby creating a false impression that the appellant had withdrawn his candidature. Additionally, it was alleged that the respondent and his agents told voters that the appellant had withdrawn. The petition sought to set aside the election on the ground that these acts amounted to corrupt practices. The case required the court to examine whether such conduct fell within the ambit of corrupt practices as defined under Section 123 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951. The judgment of the Supreme Court, however, is not provided in the excerpt; only the allegations are detailed.

Issue of Consideration

Whether the distribution of dummy ballot papers omitting the election symbol of the unsuccessful candidate, the issuance of a government ordinance granting land revenue exemption to agriculturists, and the announcement of increased dearness allowance to government employees on the eve of election constituted corrupt practices under Section 123 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

1969 LawText (SC) (02) 26

1969-02-24

Bachawat, R.S., Sikri, S.M., Hegde, K.S.

1970 AIR 211, 1969 SCR (3) 813, 1969 SCC (1) 601

H. V. Kamath

Ch. Nitiraj Singh

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Election petition challenging the election of a successful candidate on grounds of corrupt practices under the Representation of the People Act, 1951.

Remedy Sought

Setting aside of the election of the respondent.

Filing Reason

Alleged corrupt practices including distribution of dummy ballot papers, government ordinance granting benefits, and false propaganda.

Issues

Whether the acts complained of constitute corrupt practices under Section 123 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, warranting the setting aside of the election.

Acts & Sections

  • Representation of the People Act, 1951: 123
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Order Against Petitioner in Maharashtra Police Act Case — Failure to Consider Less Drastic Measures and Inadequate Material. Externment Order Set Aside as Authorities Did Not Apply Mind to Alternative Remedies U...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Addresses Allegations of Corrupt Practices in Election Petition Under Representation of People Act, 1951. The Case Examines Whether Distribution of Dummy Ballot Papers Omitting Candidate's Symbol and Government Benefits Constitute Corru...