Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Foreigners Act Conviction by Holding Appellant Not a Foreigner on Date of Entry. Person born in India before partition and holding Pakistani passport on re-entry was natural-born British subject under British Nationality and Status of Aliens Act, 1914, hence not a foreigner under unamended Section 2(a) of Foreigners Act, 1946.

In Favour of Accused
  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Fida Hussain, was born in India before partition and later left for Pakistan. He returned to India in 1953 on a Pakistani passport with an Indian visa permitting him to stay for three months, later extended up to November 15, 1953. He did not depart before the expiry of that period. He was convicted by a Sub-Divisional Magistrate on March 14, 1959 under Section 14 of the Foreigners Act, 1946 for breach of Paragraph 7 of the Foreigners Order, 1948, and sentenced to one year rigorous imprisonment. His appeal to a Sessions Judge was dismissed, and the Allahabad High Court, on revision, refused to interfere. The Supreme Court allowed his appeal by special leave. The core legal issue was whether the appellant was a foreigner on the date of his entry into India in 1953 within the meaning of Section 2(a) of the Foreigners Act, 1946 as it then stood. The appellant contended that he was not a foreigner because he was a natural-born British subject under Section 1(1)(a) of the British Nationality and Status of Aliens Act, 1914, having been born at Allahabad when that place was within His Majesty's Dominion. The Court accepted this submission, holding that Paragraph 7 of the Foreigners Order contemplates a foreigner entering India, and therefore a person who was a foreigner at the date of entry. Since the appellant was a natural-born British subject under the unamended definition, he was not a foreigner on his date of entry in 1953. Therefore, he could not have committed a breach of Paragraph 7. The Court set aside his conviction and sentence. It also observed that the definition of foreigner was amended with effect from January 19, 1957 by Act 11 of 1957, but it expressly refrained from deciding the effect of that amendment on the appellant's status. The decision establishes that status as a foreigner for the purpose of overstay offences must be determined as on the date of entry into India, applying the definition in force at that time.

Headnote

A) Foreigners Law - Definition of Foreigner - Foreigners Act, 1946, Section 2(a) (pre-1957 amendment) - Natural-born British subject under British Nationality and Status of Aliens Act, 1914, Section 1(1)(a) - A person born in India before partition when it was within His Majesty's Dominion is a natural-born British subject and hence not a foreigner under the unamended definition; conviction under Section 14 for breaching Paragraph 7 of Foreigners Order, 1948 was set aside because appellant was not a foreigner on the date of entry. Held that the foreigner status must be determined as on the date of entry into India. (No paragraph numbers in judgment)

B) Foreigners Law - Temporal Application of Definition - Foreigners Act, 1946, Section 2(a) and Foreigners Order, 1948, Paragraph 7 - The 1957 amendment of the definition of foreigner was prospective and not applicable to entry in 1953; the Court expressly declined to decide the effect of the amended definition on appellant's status. Held that because the appellant was not a foreigner when he entered, overstay did not constitute an offence. (No paragraph numbers in judgment)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appellant was a foreigner on the date of his entry into India in 1953 within the meaning of Section 2(a) of the Foreigners Act, 1946 as it then stood, and consequently whether his conviction under Section 14 for breach of Paragraph 7 of the Foreigners Order, 1948 was valid.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal allowed; conviction and sentence set aside. The appellant was not a foreigner on the date of entry into India in 1953 as defined in Section 2(a) Foreigners Act, 1946 because he was a natural-born British subject under Section 1(1)(a) British Nationality and Status of Aliens Act, 1914; therefore no breach of Paragraph 7 Foreigners Order, 1948. The Court did not decide the effect of the 1957 amendment.

Law Points

  • Definition of foreigner under Section 2(a) Foreigners Act 1946 as it stood in 1953
  • natural-born British subject under Section 1(1)(a) British Nationality and Status of Aliens Act 1914
  • person born in India before partition is natural-born British subject
  • foreigner status determined on date of entry under Paragraph 7 Foreigners Order 1948
  • amendment of definition prospective
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

1961 LawText (SC) (04) 13

Criminal Appeal No. 129 of 1960

1961-04-05

Sarkar, A.K.; Sinha, Bhuvneshwar P. (CJ); Das, S.K.; Gupta, K.C. Das; Ayyangar, N. Rajagopala

1961 AIR 1522, 1962 SCR (1) 776

Naunit Lal (appellant); G. C. Mathur, C. P. Lal (respondent)

Fida Hussain

State of Uttar Pradesh

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction under Foreigners Act for overstaying visa

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought to set aside conviction and sentence for breach of Paragraph 7 of Foreigners Order, 1948

Filing Reason

Appellant was convicted for staying in India beyond permitted period (till November 15, 1953) after entering on Pakistani passport and Indian visa

Previous Decisions

Sub-Divisional Magistrate convicted on March 14, 1959, sentenced one year rigorous imprisonment; Sessions Judge dismissed appeal; Allahabad High Court in revision refused to interfere

Issues

Whether the appellant was a foreigner on the date of entry into India in 1953 under Section 2(a) of Foreigners Act, 1946. Whether breach of Paragraph 7 of Foreigners Order, 1948 could be established against a person who was not a foreigner at the time of entry.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant contended he was not a foreigner on date of entry because natural-born British subject under Section 1(1)(a) British Nationality and Status of Aliens Act, 1914, hence Paragraph 7 did not apply.

Ratio Decidendi

A person born in India before partition when it was within His Majesty's Dominion is a natural-born British subject under Section 1(1)(a) British Nationality and Status of Aliens Act, 1914, and hence not a foreigner under Section 2(a) Foreigners Act, 1946 as it stood in 1953; foreigner status for breach of Paragraph 7 Foreigners Order, 1948 must be determined as on date of entry.

Judgment Excerpts

The paragraph contemplates a foreigner entering India, and therefore, a person who at the date of the entry was a foreigner. That the appellant was born at Allahabad at a time when it was within his Britannic Majesty's Dominion is not in dispute. That being so, we think that it must be held that the date of his entry into India the appellant was a natural-born British subject and, therefore, not a foreigner. In the result we allow the appeal and set aside the conviction of the appellant and sentence passed on him.

Procedural History

Born in India before partition, left for Pakistan, returned in 1953 on Pakistani passport and visa, stayed beyond visa expiry, convicted by Sub-Divisional Magistrate on March 14, 1959, appeal dismissed by Sessions Judge, revision dismissed by Allahabad High Court on March 9, 1960, appeal by special leave to Supreme Court, allowed on April 5, 1961.

Acts & Sections

  • Foreigners Act, 1946: Section 2(a), Section 14, Section 3, Section 3(2)(e)
  • Foreigners Order, 1948: Paragraph 7
  • British Nationality and Status of Aliens Act, 1914: Section 1(1)(a)
  • Indian Passport Act, 1920:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Regional Director's Rejection of Amalgamation Scheme Under Section 233 Companies Act — Regional Director Lacks Power to Reject, Must File Application Before NCLT if Scheme Not in Public Interest. The court held that the Re...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Widow's Petition for Freedom Fighter Pension Based on Civil Court Declaration. Petitioner declared first legally wedded wife entitled to pension from date of second wife's death.