Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Purchaser in Contract Damages Recovery Dispute. Interim Injunction Under Section 41(b) of Arbitration Act, 1940 Upheld as Clause 18 Applies Only to Sums Presently Due and Payable, Not Unliquidated Damages.

In Favour of Prosecution
  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals by the Union of India against orders of the Delhi High Court granting interim injunctions restraining the Union from recovering its claim for damages by appropriating amounts due to the respondent contractor under other contracts. The dispute arose from a contract for supply of foam compound, governed by the General Conditions of Contract in Standard Form D.G.S.&D. 68. Clause 18 of those conditions provided for recovery of sums due by appropriating security deposit and other sums due to the contractor. The Union claimed damages for breach under clause 14 and sought to recover them from pending bills of the respondent. The respondent filed an application under Section 20 of the Arbitration Act, 1940, and the disputes were referred to arbitration. During pendency, the respondent applied for interim injunction, which the High Court granted, holding that clause 18 did not authorise recovery unless the claim was admitted or adjudicated. The main legal issues were whether the High Court had power under Section 41(b) of the Arbitration Act to grant such an injunction, and whether clause 18 permitted recovery of unliquidated damages. The Court held that Section 41(b) empowered the court to issue interim injunctions in relation to arbitration proceedings, but such orders could not in substance direct payment of other sums. However, the injunction in this case merely restrained appropriation and did not compel payment, so it was within power. On interpretation of clause 18, the Court held that the heading 'Recovery of sums due' and the context indicated that the clause applied only to sums presently due and payable. A claim for unliquidated damages, even if stipulated as liquidated under clause 14, did not give rise to a debt until liability was adjudicated and damages assessed; therefore, it was not a sum presently due and payable. The Court relied on Kesoram Industries v. Commissioner of Wealth Tax and other precedents to conclude that a claim for damages for breach of contract is not an actionable claim or debt until adjudicated. Consequently, the Union had no right under clause 18 to appropriate amounts towards its unadjudicated damages claim, and the High Court's injunction was upheld. The appeals were dismissed.

Headnote

A) Arbitration - Interim Injunction - Scope of Section 41(b) of Arbitration Act, 1940 - Court's power to grant interim injunction in relation to arbitration proceedings - Indian Arbitration Act, 1940, Section 41(b) read with Second Schedule - The High Court can issue interim injunction for the purpose of and in relation to arbitration proceedings, but such injunction cannot in substance amount to a direction to pay amounts due under other contracts. In the present case, the order did not direct payment but only restrained appropriation of amounts towards unadjudicated damages claim, and was therefore within power. Held that the interim injunction was validly granted under Section 41(b) (Paras not mentioned).

B) Contract Interpretation - Recovery of Sums Due - Interpretation of Clause 18 of Standard Form Contract D.G.S.&D. 68 - Meaning of 'any claim for the payment of a sum of money arises out of or under the contract' - Indian Contract Act, 1872 (general principles of interpretation) - The clause must be read as a whole in light of its heading 'Recovery of sums due' and context; it applies only to sums presently due and payable, not to unliquidated damages. The clause merely provides an additional mode of recovery and does not authorise recovery of sums not presently payable or disputed as to liability or quantum. Held that the appellant had no right under clause 18 to appropriate amounts towards its unadjudicated damages claim (Paras not mentioned).

C) Contract Law - Liquidated and Unliquidated Damages - Nature of Claim for Liquidated Damages under Clause 14 - Indian Contract Act, 1872, Section 74 - Under Indian law, even where damages are stipulated as liquidated, the party complaining of breach can recover only reasonable compensation, the stipulated amount being merely the outside limit; the claim stands on the same footing as unliquidated damages. A claim for unliquidated damages does not give rise to a debt until liability is adjudicated and damages assessed by an adjudicatory authority. Held that the appellant's claim for damages was not a claim for a sum presently due and payable within clause 18 (Paras not mentioned).

D) Arbitration - Interim Injunction - Restraining Recovery of Damages from Pending Bills - Application of Section 41(b) of Arbitration Act, 1940 to clause 18 recovery - Indian Arbitration Act, 1940, Section 41(b); Indian Contract Act, 1872, Section 74 - The claim for damages formed the subject matter of arbitration proceedings, and the High Court's injunction only prevented the appellant from satisfying that claim by appropriating other sums due to the respondent. The appellant could still refuse to pay such sums if it had a valid defence, and the respondent's remedy would be to seek appropriate forum. Held that the High Court was justified in granting the interim injunction (Paras not mentioned).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the High Court had power under Section 41(b) of the Arbitration Act, 1940 to grant an interim injunction restraining the appellant from recovering its claim for damages by appropriating amounts due to the respondent under other contracts; Whether clause 18 of the General Conditions of Contract permitted recovery of unliquidated damages by appropriation of other sums due; Whether a claim for liquidated damages under clause 14 constitutes a claim for a sum presently due and payable

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeals dismissed. The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's interim injunction, holding that clause 18 of the General Conditions of Contract did not authorise the appellant to recover unliquidated damages by appropriating other sums due to the respondent, as such a claim did not give rise to a debt until adjudicated. The injunction was within the power of the court under Section 41(b) of the Arbitration Act, 1940.

Law Points

  • Interim injunction under Section 41(b) of Arbitration Act
  • 1940 can be granted to protect subject matter of arbitration
  • Clause 18 of Standard Form Contract D.G.S.&D. 68 applies only to sums presently due and payable
  • Claim for unliquidated damages does not give rise to a debt until liability is adjudicated and damages assessed
  • Stipulated liquidated damages under Section 74 of Indian Contract Act
  • 1872 are only an outside limit and claim stands on same footing as unliquidated damages
  • Heading and context of a clause guide its interpretation
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

1974 LawText (SC) (03) 14

Civil Appeal No. 1330 of 1973 and Civil Appeals Nos. 1224 & 1225 of 1973

1974-03-12

P.N. Bhagwati, P.K. Goswami

1974 AIR 1265, 1974 SCR (3) 556, 1974 SCC (2) 231

L. N. Sinha, Solicitor General of India, Shyamala Pappu, S. P. Nayar, D. G. Singhania, M. K. Garg, Shiv Khurana, D. D. Sharma

Union of India

Raman Iron Foundry

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil appeal against High Court order granting interim injunction restraining appellant from recovering damages claim from pending bills under clause 18 of contract

Remedy Sought

Respondent sought interim injunction under Section 41(b) of the Arbitration Act, 1940 to restrain appellant from appropriating amounts due under other contracts towards its unadjudicated damages claim

Filing Reason

Appellant threatened to recover claimed damages from respondent's pending bills under clause 18 of the General Conditions of Contract, despite the claim being disputed and not adjudicated

Previous Decisions

Delhi High Court granted interim injunction holding that clause 18 did not authorise the appellant to appropriate amounts of pending bills towards satisfaction of its claim for damages unless such claim was admitted by the respondent or adjudicated upon by the arbitrator or the Court

Issues

Whether the High Court had power under Section 41(b) of the Arbitration Act, 1940 to grant an interim injunction restraining the appellant from recovering its claim for damages by appropriating amounts due to the respondent under other contracts Whether clause 18 of the General Conditions of Contract permitted recovery of unliquidated damages by appropriation of other sums due to the contractor Whether a claim for liquidated damages under clause 14 constitutes a claim for a sum presently due and payable within the meaning of clause 18

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant contended that clause 18 covered any claim for payment of a sum of money arising out of or under the contract, including a claim for damages, and therefore it was entitled to recover such claim by appropriating other sums due to the respondent Appellant argued that the interim injunction in substance directed it to pay the amounts due under other contracts, which was beyond the scope of Section 41(b) of the Arbitration Act Respondent contended that clause 18 applied only to sums presently due and payable, and a claim for damages for breach of contract was not a sum due until liability was adjudicated and damages assessed Respondent submitted that the court had power under Section 41(b) to grant an interim injunction to protect the subject matter of arbitration, and the injunction did not compel payment but only restrained appropriation of amounts towards the unadjudicated claim

Ratio Decidendi

Clause 18 of the Standard Form Contract D.G.S.&D. 68 applies only to claims for sums presently due and payable, and not to unliquidated damages. A claim for unliquidated damages, even if stipulated as liquidated under Section 74 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, does not give rise to a debt until liability is adjudicated and damages assessed by an adjudicatory authority. The court has power under Section 41(b) of the Arbitration Act, 1940 to grant an interim injunction to restrain appropriation of amounts towards such unadjudicated claim, as it relates to the subject matter of arbitration.

Judgment Excerpts

A claim for unliquidated damages does not give rise to a debt until the liability is adjudicated upon and damages assessed by an adjudicatory authority. The only thing which the appellant is interdicted from doing is to satisfy its claim for damages by appropriating such amounts. The heading of the clause reads 'Recovery of sums due'. The damages claimed are liquidated damages under cl. 14 of the Contract; but under Indian law there is no difference in the nature of the claim whether it be for liquidated damages or for unliquidated damages.

Procedural History

Respondent tendered for supply of foam compound to appellant; acceptance of tender dated 16 July 1968 subject to General Conditions of Contract in Standard Form D.G.S.&D. 68. Dispute arose regarding performance, each party alleging breach and claiming damages. Appellant claimed damages under clause 14 and informed respondent that failure to pay would result in recovery from pending bills under clause 18. Respondent filed application under Section 20 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 before Delhi High Court; disputes referred to arbitration. During pendency of arbitration, amounts became due and payable by appellant to respondent under other contracts. Respondent applied for interim injunction to restrain appellant from recovering its damages claim from those amounts. High Court granted injunction on 15 November 1972 (I.A. Nos. 846 and 119 of 1972 in Suit No. 158 of 1971) and 22 January 1973 (I.A. No. 1854 of 1972 in Suit No. 485(A) of 1972). Appellant filed appeals by special leave to Supreme Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Arbitration Act, 1940: Section 20, Section 41(b)
  • Indian Contract Act, 1872: Section 74
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Karnataka High Court Reserves Cross-Writ Petitions Against Labour Court Award Modifying Dismissal of Security Guard for Negligence and Insubordination to Lesser Punishment; Reinstatement Ordered with 25% Backwages. The Labour Court Set Aside Dismissa...
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Allows Writ Petition in GST Matter — Quashes Order Under Section 74 of CGST Act, 2017. Respondent authorities directed to pass fresh order within 12 weeks after setting aside impugned order dated 30.12.2025.