Supreme Court Upholds High Court Finding that Cadre Authority Society Cannot Be Registered as Cooperative Society and Bank Rules Are Ultra Vires. Registrar's Power Under Section 148(2)(xxx) of Rajasthan Co-operative Societies Act, 1965 Does Not Extend to Compelling Primary Agricultural Credit Cooperative Societies to Pay Salaries of Paid Secretaries Appointed by District Cooperative Societies.

  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The litigation arose from a challenge by Primary Agriculture Credit Cooperative Societies (PACS) to the validity of the Rajasthan Credit Co-operative Institutions Cadre Authority Limited (Cadre Authority Society) and to the Central Cooperative Bank Rules, 1969, which required PACS to contribute to a Manager's Salary Fund for paid secretaries. Paid Secretaries were recruited by the Cadre Authority Society, constituted under Section 4(1) of the Rajasthan Co-operative Societies Act, 1965, appointed by Managers of District Co-operative Banks, and sought to be posted to PACS with salary liability fixed on PACS. The PACS contended that the Cadre Authority Society could not be registered as a cooperative society and that the Registrar lacked power to make rules compelling salary contributions. A Division Bench of the Rajasthan High Court, by judgment dated May 9, 1991 in Writ Petition No.1018-20 of 1979, held that the Cadre Authority Society could not be registered under Section 4 of the Act and that the Bank Rules were ultra vires the Registrar's power under Rule 41 of the Rajasthan Co-operative Societies Rules, 1966. The Unions of Managers and paid secretaries appealed. Pending appeals, the State Government framed the Conditions of Service of the Managers/Assistant Managers of the Agricultural Credit Cooperative Societies Rules, 1995, but the appellants did not accept them. Before the Supreme Court, the appellants argued that the Cadre Authority Society facilitated the operations of PACS and was thus valid under the second limb of Section 4(1); that the Registrar had power under Rule 41 read with Sections 147(2) and 148(2)(xxx) to regulate service conditions and prescribe qualifications; and that PACS were bound to contribute to salaries. The State argued that the Registrar had no such power and the High Court was correct. The Supreme Court examined Section 4(1) and observed that the Cadre Authority Society admittedly did not fall under the first limb relating to promotion of economic interests of members in accordance with cooperative principles. The second limb covered societies established to facilitate operations of such societies, but facilitation contemplated lending or funding support; the Cadre Authority Society merely recruited paid secretaries who were a third agency, appointed by District Co-operative Societies and posted to PACS, without being a lending institution. The Court noted the three-tier cooperative structure of PACS, District Co-operative Societies, and Central Co-operative Bank, and found that the Cadre Authority Society did not facilitate PACS in funding them for loan disbursement. Regarding rule-making power, the Court analysed Rule 41 and Section 148(2)(xxx) and held that the Registrar could prescribe qualifications and service conditions only for officers or employees of each society, and that the society itself had disciplinary and controlling power. The Court found a dichotomy: paid secretaries were not appointed by PACS but by the District Cooperative Society through its Manager; the 1969 Rules defined Manager as the Chief Executive and paid employee of the society, and provided that the society shall not appoint any person as Manager. A paid secretary was not a Manager appointed by PACS. Section 148(2)(xxx) listed Manager, Secretary, Accountant or any other officer or employee of the society; there could be no additional paid secretary to the PACS. Consequently, PACS could not be fastened with liability to contribute to the salary fund for persons appointed and controlled by the District Cooperative Society and Cadre Authority Society. The provided text ends before the final operative order, but the court's reasoning supported the High Court's findings that the Cadre Authority Society was not validly registered and the Bank Rules were ultra vires.

Headnote

A) Cooperative Society - Registration and Validity - Section 4(1) Rajasthan Co-operative Societies Act, 1965 - A society registered under the second limb of Section 4(1) must facilitate the operations of cooperative societies such as funding or disbursement of loans; a Cadre Authority Society that only recruits paid secretaries and does not lend money does not qualify. Held that the Cadre Authority Society was not a valid cooperative society.

B) Administrative Law - Delegated Legislation - Ultra Vires Rule-Making by Registrar - Sections 147(2), 148(2)(xxx) Rajasthan Co-operative Societies Act, 1965 and Rule 41 Rajasthan Co-operative Societies Rules, 1966 - The Registrar's power to prescribe qualifications and conditions of service is limited to officers and employees of each society; the Registrar cannot create a separate cadre authority to recruit employees for other societies or compel primary societies to contribute to salary fund. Held that the Central Cooperative Bank Rules, 1969 to the extent they forced PACS to contribute were ultra vires.

C) Labour Law - Employer-Employee Relationship - Paid Secretaries Not Employees of PACS - Section 148(2)(xxx) Rajasthan Co-operative Societies Act, 1965 and 1969 Rules - Since paid secretaries were appointed by District Cooperative Society's Manager and not by PACS, they were not Manager, Secretary, Accountant or other officer/employee of PACS; PACS could not be compelled to retain or pay them. Held that paid secretaries were outside the scope of Section 148(2)(xxx).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether Cadre Authority Society could be registered as a cooperative society under Section 4(1) of the Rajasthan Co-operative Societies Act, 1965; whether the Registrar had power under Rule 41 read with Sections 147(2) and 148(2)(xxx) to make Central Cooperative Bank Rules, 1969 compelling PACS to contribute to salaries of paid Secretaries; whether paid Secretaries were officers/employees of PACS

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Law Points

  • Section 4(1) of Rajasthan Co-operative Societies Act
  • 1965 requires society to have objects in accordance with cooperative principles or to facilitate operations of such societies
  • Cadre Authority Society merely recruits paid secretaries and does not facilitate lending operations
  • Registrar's rule-making power under Section 148(2)(xxx) extends only to officers/employees of the concerned society
  • paid Secretaries appointed by District Cooperative Societies are not officers of PACS
  • PACS cannot be compelled to contribute to salary fund under Central Cooperative Bank Rules
  • 1969
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

1996 LawText (SC) (03) 11

Civil Appeal Nos. 4174-75 of 1996 (Arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 14778-79 of 1995)

1996-03-01

K. Ramaswamy, G.B. Pattanaik

JT 1996 (3) 292, 1996 SCALE (2)795

R.K. Jain, Rajiv Dhavan, Jitendra Sharma, Aruneshwar Gupta

Sahkari Samitiyan Vyavasthapak Union etc.

State of Rajasthan & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Challenge to validity of Cadre Authority Society and Central Cooperative Bank Rules, 1969 imposing salary contribution liability on Primary Agriculture Credit Cooperative Societies

Remedy Sought

Appellants sought reversal of High Court judgment and recognition of Cadre Authority Society as valid cooperative society and enforceability of Bank Rules requiring PACS to contribute to Manager's Salary Fund

Filing Reason

High Court held Cadre Authority Society cannot be registered under Section 4 of Rajasthan Co-operative Societies Act, 1965 and Bank Rules ultra vires Rule 41; hence appeals by Unions and Managers

Previous Decisions

Division Bench of Rajasthan High Court, judgment dated 1991-05-09 in Writ Petition No.1018-20 of 1979, held Cadre Authority Society cannot be registered under Section 4 and Bank Rules ultra vires Registrar's power under Rule 41 of Rajasthan Co-operative Societies Rules, 1966

Issues

Whether Cadre Authority Society could be a cooperative society registered under Section 4(1) of the Rajasthan Co-operative Societies Act, 1965 Whether the Registrar had power under Rule 41 read with Sections 147(2) and 148(2)(xxx) to make Central Cooperative Bank Rules, 1969 compelling PACS to contribute to salaries of paid Secretaries Whether paid Secretaries appointed by District Cooperative Societies and controlled by Cadre Authority Society were officers or employees of PACS

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants contended that Cadre Authority Society is a society facilitating operations of PACS and valid under Section 4(1) of the Act Registrar under Rule 41 read with Section 147(2) and Section 148(2)(xxx) of the Act is empowered to regulate service conditions of paid Secretaries and prescribe qualifications Bank Rules prescribe amounts collected from PACS to pay salaries of paid Secretaries, and PACS are bound to contribute Managers are members of PACS, therefore PACS bound by Bank Rules State contended that Registrar has no power to make Bank Rules or direct PACS to contribute for salary and allowances of paid Secretaries; High Court findings were correct

Ratio Decidendi

A society registered under Section 4(1) second limb must facilitate operations of cooperative societies such as lending or funding; a society merely recruiting paid secretaries without lending function does not qualify. The Registrar's power under Section 148(2)(xxx) extends only to prescribing qualifications and service conditions of officers or employees of each society; the Registrar cannot create a separate cadre authority to recruit employees for other societies or compel primary societies to pay salaries of persons not appointed by them. Paid Secretaries appointed by District Cooperative Societies are not Manager, Secretary, Accountant or other officer/employee of PACS and thus outside the scope of Section 148(2)(xxx).

Judgment Excerpts

Subject to the provisions of this Act, a Cooperative Society which has its objects and accordance with the cooperative principles, or a cooperative society established with the object of facilitating the operations of such societies, may be registered under this Act A paid Secretary is not, therefore, a Manager appointed by the PACS. It would, therefore, be clear that they are outside the scope

Procedural History

Paid Secretaries recruited by Rajasthan Credit Co-operative Institutions Cadre Authority Limited under Section 4(1) of Rajasthan Co-operative Societies Act, 1965; appointed by Managers of District Cooperative Banks under 1977 Rules and later 1969 Rules; sought to be posted to Primary Agriculture Credit Cooperative Societies with salary liability; PACS filed Writ Petition No.1018-20 of 1979 challenging validity of Cadre Authority Society and Registrar's power under Central Cooperative Bank Rules, 1969; Division Bench of Rajasthan High Court on 1991-05-09 held Cadre Authority Society cannot be registered under Section 4 and Bank Rules ultra vires Rule 41; appeals preferred; during pendency Government framed 1995 Rules; appellants not agreeable.

Acts & Sections

  • Rajasthan Co-operative Societies Act, 1965: Section 4(1), Section 68, Section 70, Section 71, Section 72, Section 147(2), Section 148(2)(xxx)
  • Rajasthan Co-operative Societies Rules, 1966: Rule 41
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Refusal of Injunction in Property Dispute — Sale Deed and Power of Attorney Challenged as Fraudulent. Court finds prima facie case of fraud and misrepresentation in execution of power of attorney and subseque...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Teachers in Privately Managed Aided Schools' Right to Pay Parity with Government School Teachers. Pay Scales and Dearness Allowance of Aided School Teachers Must Match Government School Teachers Following Haryana State Adhyapak ...