Supreme Court Considers Appeal Against Bombay High Court Order Granting Upgraded Head Master Pay Scale to Zilla Parishad Primary School Teachers. The appeal challenged High Court's reliance on suspended CEO order dated 18.04.1990 and teachers' entitlement under Government Resolution dated 22.10.1970 and Maharashtra Zilla Parishads District Services (Recruitment) Rules, 1967.

  • 9
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal by special leave arose from a judgment of the Bombay High Court dated 3.9.93 in a writ petition filed by respondents 1 to 4, who were primary school teachers absorbed in Zilla Parishad service. The dispute concerned their claim for upgraded Head Master pay scale under a State Government Resolution. The State of Maharashtra issued Resolution No. PTP.1070-F dated 22.10.1970 authorizing Zilla Parishads and other local bodies to upgrade existing primary teacher posts to Head Masters in the scale of Rs.145-250 retrospectively from 1.4.1966. The number of upgraded posts was to be determined based on schools teaching up to Standard VII and other schools with 200 or more pupils on 1.4.1966, with annual review. Promotion was to be made under Rule 6(4) read with item No.8 in Appendix IV (Part II) to Rule 5 of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads District Services (Recruitment) Rules, 1967, requiring five years continuous service and training. Schedules defined Head Master, upgraded Head Master, eligible and entitled teachers, notional appointment dates, and classified cases. Respondents 1 to 4, who served as teachers on deputation between 1962-1968 and were absorbed in 1968-69, filed Writ Petition No. 1638 of 1489 before the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad claiming the time scale of Head Master from 1.4.1966. While the petition was pending, the Chief Executive Officer passed an order dated 18.4.1990 granting the scale; the Education Officer passed a consequential order dated 31.5.1990; the Accounts Officer pointed out an error; and the Chief Executive Officer suspended the earlier orders by order dated 26.10.1990. The Zilla Parishad filed counter affidavits stating that upgraded posts were not available under Clauses (i) and (ii) of the Resolution. The High Court by the impugned order relied on the Chief Executive Officer's order dated 18.4.1990 and apparently did not notice the suspension order. The Supreme Court granted leave and was considering whether the High Court erred in relying on the suspended order and whether the respondents were entitled to the upgraded pay scale. The extracted text ends mid-sentence without the final analysis, reasoning, or decision of the Supreme Court.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Pay Scale Upgradation - Government Resolution No. PTP.1070-F dated 22.10.1970 - Maharashtra Zilla Parishads District Services (Recruitment) Rules, 1967, Rule 6(4) read with item No.8 in Appendix IV (Part II) to Rule 5 - The State authorized upgradation of primary school teacher posts to Head Masters in pay scale Rs.145-250 retrospectively from 01.04.1966 and prescribed number of posts based on eligible schools on 01.04.1966, with annual review - The respondents claimed entitlement to upgraded pay scale from 01.04.1966; the Zilla Parishad contended upgraded posts were not available under Clauses (i) and (ii) of the Resolution - Held that the final determination of entitlement is not stated in the extracted text; the High Court granted relief relying on CEO order dated 18.04.1990 (Paras 1-8).

B) Administrative Law - Suspension of Administrative Order - Effect on Judicial Reliance - Maharashtra Zilla Parishads District Services (Recruitment) Rules, 1967 - The Chief Executive Officer by order dated 18.04.1990 directed grant of upgraded Head Master scale, but later suspended that order and the Education Officer's consequential order dated 31.05.1990 by order dated 26.10.1990 - The appeal before the Supreme Court contended the Bombay High Court committed gross error in relying on the suspended order - Held that the High Court's reliance on a suspended order was challenged; final decision on this ground is not available in the extracted text (Paras 1-8).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Bombay High Court committed gross error in relying on the Chief Executive Officer's order dated 18.4.1990 despite its suspension by order dated 26.10.1990; whether respondents 1 to 4 were entitled to the pay scale of upgraded Head Masters with effect from 1.4.1966 under Government Resolution dated 22.10.1970 and the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads District Services (Recruitment) Rules, 1967; whether upgraded Head Master posts were available under Clauses (i) and (ii) of the Resolution.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Not mentioned in the provided text; the judgment excerpt ends mid-sentence before the Supreme Court's final order.

Law Points

  • Government Resolution authorized upgradation of primary school teacher posts to Head Masters with retrospective effect from 01.04.1966
  • number of upgraded posts to be fixed based on eligible schools and reviewed annually
  • promotion to be made under Maharashtra Zilla Parishads District Services (Recruitment) Rules
  • 1967
  • Chief Executive Officer's order granting scale was suspended by subsequent order
  • High Court erred in relying on suspended order
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

1996 LawText (SC) (04) 59

1996-04-24

G.B. Pattanaik, K. Ramaswamy

1996 AIR 1994 JT 1996 (5) 135 1996 SCALE (4)335

Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Beed & Ors.

Syed Yasin & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition before Bombay High Court challenging denial of upgraded Head Master pay scale, brought by primary school teachers against Zilla Parishad and State of Maharashtra; appeal by Zilla Parishad against High Court order.

Remedy Sought

Respondents 1 to 4 sought direction to grant time scale of pay admissible to post of Head Master with effect from 1.4.1966 based on Government Resolution dated 22.10.1970.

Filing Reason

Teachers claimed entitlement to upgraded Head Master pay scale under resolution; Zilla Parishad disputed availability of posts and relied on suspension of earlier CEO order granting scale.

Previous Decisions

Chief Executive Officer order dated 18.4.1990 granted scale; Education Officer order dated 31.5.1990 fixed scale; CEO order dated 26.10.1990 suspended earlier orders; Bombay High Court allowed writ petition by judgment dated 3.9.93 relying on suspended order; appeal filed.

Issues

Whether the Bombay High Court erred in relying on the Chief Executive Officer's order dated 18.4.1990 despite its suspension by order dated 26.10.1990. Whether respondents 1 to 4 were entitled to the pay scale of upgraded Head Masters with effect from 1.4.1966 under Government Resolution dated 22.10.1970 and the Recruitment Rules. Whether upgraded Head Master posts were available for respondents under Clauses (i) and (ii) of the Resolution.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant contended that the High Court committed gross error in relying on the suspended order of the Chief Executive Officer dated 18.4.1990. Appellant contended that respondents could not have been granted the higher scale of pay as upgraded Head Master posts were not available under Clauses (i) and (ii) of the Resolution dated 22.10.1970. Respondents claimed entitlement to time scale of pay admissible to Head Master from 1.4.1966 on the basis of the Government Resolution dated 22.10.1970.

Ratio Decidendi

Not mentioned in the provided text; no legal principle or final ratio can be extracted from the incomplete excerpt. The appeal challenged the High Court's reliance on a suspended administrative order.

Judgment Excerpts

Leave granted. This appeal by Special leave is directed against the judgment of the Bombay High Court dated 3.9.93 inter alia on the ground that the High Court committed gross error in relying upon the order of the Chief Executive Officer dated 18.4.90 even though the said Chief Executive Officer has suspended the operation of his earlier order by his order dated 26.10.1990. Respondents nos. 1 to 4 filed Writ Petition No. 1638 of 1489 before the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad claiming that they are entitled to the time scale of pay admissible to the post of Head Master with effect from 1.4.1966 on the basis of the aforesaid Government Resolution dated 22.10.1970.

Procedural History

Respondents 1 to 4 filed Writ Petition No. 1638 of 1489 before Bombay High Court at Aurangabad claiming upgraded pay scale. While pending, CEO passed order dated 18.4.1990 granting scale; Education Officer passed order dated 31.5.1990; Accounts Officer pointed out error; CEO suspended earlier orders by order dated 26.10.1990; Zilla Parishad filed counter affidavits opposing claim; High Court allowed writ petition by judgment dated 3.9.93; appeal by special leave before Supreme Court; leave granted; judgment excerpt incomplete.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Zilla Parishads District Services (Recruitment) Rules, 1967: Rule 6(4), Rule 5, Appendix IV (Part II) Item No. 8
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Sanction Under Section 17A of PC Act — FIR Registered Without Prior Approval from Competent Authority for Investigation Against Public Servant
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Petition by Supplying Agent in Co-operative Dispute Over Seed Liability — Petitioner Not Liable as It Was Not a Party to the Loan Transaction. Co-operative Appellate Court Exceeded Jurisdiction in Review by Fixing Liability...