Supreme Court Orders Establishment of Courts in Tis Hazari Due to Vacant Rooms. Court Directs Timely Administrative Processes for Financial Sanction and Construction of New Courts.

  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute involved the utilization of vacant rooms at Tis Hazari Courts for establishing new courts. The Supreme Court, through an order dated May 5, 1997, constituted a committee of three advocates to inspect the premises and report on the available rooms. The committee visited the site on May 8, 1997, and identified several vacant rooms suitable for court establishment. The court directed that these rooms, except for one reserved for the Revenue Department, be handed over to the Registrar of the High Court within six weeks. The District Judge was instructed to report on the financial requirements for setting up the courts within four weeks of possession. The court emphasized the need for administrative and financial sanction from the government and directed the completion of the establishment within two months after the necessary approvals. The writ petition was ordered accordingly, and further proceedings were scheduled for two weeks later.

Headnote

A) Judicial Administration - Establishment of Courts - Direction for Utilization of Vacant Rooms - Not mentioned - The court directed the handing over of several vacant rooms at Tis Hazari Courts to the High Court for establishing new courts, following a committee's report on the available spaces. The court mandated the District Judge to report on the costs required for setting up the courts, ensuring timely administrative processes for sanctioning and construction (Paras Not mentioned).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the vacant rooms at Tis Hazari Courts should be handed over for establishing new courts.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court ordered the vacant rooms at Tis Hazari Courts to be handed over to the High Court for establishing new courts, with specific timelines for reporting and sanctioning processes.

Law Points

  • Judicial administration
  • Court establishment
  • Committee report
  • Administrative sanction
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

1997 LawText (SC) (07) 6

1997-07-07

K. Ramaswamy, D.P. Wadhwa

Ms. A. Subhashini

Delhi Judicial Service Association (Regd.)

Union of India through the Secretary & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Petition for establishment of courts in vacant rooms.

Remedy Sought

Handing over of vacant rooms to the High Court for court establishment.

Filing Reason

Need for additional court facilities at Tis Hazari.

Issues

Utilization of vacant rooms for court establishment

Submissions/Arguments

Committee report on available rooms Need for administrative sanction for court establishment

Ratio Decidendi

The court emphasized the importance of utilizing available resources for judicial administration and established a clear process for the timely establishment of courts.

Judgment Excerpts

The Committee was requested to visit the Tis Hazari Courts and to submit a report on the vacant rooms. The report indicates that Room Nos. 346, 347, 354-A, 354-B, 359, 156, 145, 361, 361-B, 361-C, 361-D, room adjacent to Room No.361, 274-A and 274-B are vacant.

Procedural History

The court ordered the constitution of a committee on May 5, 1997, which inspected the premises on May 8, 1997, and submitted a report leading to the current order.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Union's Limitation Defense in Service Dismissal Suit. Suit Filed in 1980 Challenging 1973 Dismissal Held Barred by Article 113 of Limitation Act, 1963 Despite Alleged Procedural Defects in Departmental Enquiry.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses BMC Appeal in Property Tax Rateable Value Dispute — Upholds Small Causes Court Order Setting Aside Enhancement for Non-Compliance with MMC Act Sections 162(2) and 167. Notice of Enhancement Not Properly Served and No Per...