Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Regarding Alteration of Date of Birth in Service Records. The court found that the date of birth recorded in the service book is final unless a bona fide clerical mistake is established.

  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved a dispute over the alteration of the respondent's date of birth recorded in his service records. The respondent, who joined the Indian Police Service in 1968, initially had his date of birth recorded as 17th June, 1939, based on his school leaving certificate. After discovering a different date from his horoscope and birth records, he sought to change his date of birth to 15th June, 1941, through various representations to the state and central governments, all of which were rejected. He then filed a suit in the District Munsif court, which ruled in his favor, leading to a corrected certificate. However, the central government rejected his subsequent requests for alteration based on Rule 16A of the All India Services (Death-cum-Retirement Benefits) Amendment Rules, 1978. The respondent's appeal to the Central Administrative Tribunal was also successful, prompting the Union of India to appeal to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court analyzed the applicability of Rule 16A and concluded that the date of birth recorded in the service book was final and could only be altered in cases of bona fide clerical mistakes, which was not established in this case. The court emphasized that the principle of estoppel applied, as the respondent had initially represented a specific date of birth to gain entry into service. Ultimately, the Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the original date of birth as recorded in the service book.

Headnote

A) Administrative Law - Alteration of Date of Birth - Entitlement to Change - All India Services (Death-cum-Retirement Benefits) Amendment Rules, 1978, Rule 16A - The court held that the date of birth recorded in the service book is final unless a bona fide clerical mistake is established. The respondent's request for alteration was denied as no clerical error was proven, and the original date of birth was accepted as correct (Paras 1-9).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the respondent was entitled to alter his date of birth as recorded in his service record.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the Tribunal's order, and upheld the date of birth of 17th June, 1939 as recorded in the service book, dismissing the respondent's application for alteration.

Law Points

  • Alteration of date of birth
  • service records
  • estoppel
  • clerical mistake
  • Rule 16A
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

1997 LawText (SC) (04) 83

1997-04-09

J.S. Verma, B.N. Kirpal

N.N. Goswami, H.S. Gururaja Rao

Union of India

C. Rama Swamy and Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Dispute over alteration of date of birth in service records.

Remedy Sought

The respondent sought to alter his date of birth from 17th June, 1939 to 15th June, 1941.

Filing Reason

The respondent claimed a different date of birth based on personal records discovered after his mother's death.

Previous Decisions

The initial request for alteration was rejected by the state and central governments, and a suit was filed which was decreed in favor of the respondent.

Issues

Entitlement to change date of birth in service records Applicability of Rule 16A regarding date of birth

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued that the application was time-barred and misrepresented the rules. The respondent contended that the Tribunal's order was justified and that the 1971 Rules applied.

Ratio Decidendi

The date of birth recorded in the service book is final unless a bona fide clerical mistake is established; the principle of estoppel applies in cases where the date of birth affects eligibility and appointment.

Judgment Excerpts

The question which arises for consideration in this appeal is whether the respondent was entitled to ask for and alteration for his date of birth as entered in his service record. The date of birth recorded in the service book is that of 17th June, 1939. The principle of estoppel would clearly be applicable and relief of change of date of birth can be legitimately denied.

Procedural History

The respondent's initial request for alteration was rejected by the state government, followed by a series of representations to the central government, all of which were denied. The respondent then filed a suit which was decreed in his favor, leading to further representations that were also rejected, culminating in an appeal to the Supreme Court.

Acts & Sections

  • All India Services (Death-cum-Retirement Benefits) Amendment Rules: Rule 16A
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Allows Transfer of Family Suit from Visnagar to Patan on Wife's Plea of Convenience and Safety Under Section 24 CPC. Wife's Convenience Held Paramount in Transfer of Divorce Proceedings.
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Allows Transfer of Family Suit from Ahmedabad to Thasara in Wife's Favor Under Section 24 CPC. Convenience of Wife with Minor Child Given Primacy Over Husband's Choice of Forum in Matrimonial Dispute.