Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case — Clarifies Depreciation on Building Costs.

  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved an appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax against M/s. Hindustan Times Ltd. concerning the assessment years 1973-74, 1974-75, and 1977-78 to 1980-81. The primary issue was whether the amount of Rs. 36,96,516, paid by the assessee for the commercial use of a multi-storeyed building, should be added to the cost of the building for depreciation purposes. The assessee had purchased a residential building in 1961 and later demolished it to construct a new building for commercial use, incurring additional charges for this purpose. The Revenue contended that the amount should be added to the cost of the land rather than the building, arguing that it was paid for commercial use. However, both the Commissioner (Appeals) and the Tribunal concluded that the amount was correctly added to the cost of the building, as it was related to the additional construction. The High Court affirmed this view, noting that the land had already been converted to commercial use prior to the payment in question. The Supreme Court agreed with the lower courts, emphasizing that the payment was for a business asset and thus should be included in the building's cost for depreciation. The court dismissed the appeal with costs, clarifying that the distinction made in prior case law regarding land and building costs did not apply to the current issue.

Headnote

A) Income Tax - Depreciation - Inclusion of Costs - Income Tax Act, 1961, Section 256(2) - The court examined whether the sum of Rs. 36,96,516 paid for commercial use of additional area should be included in the cost of the building for depreciation purposes. The court upheld the findings of the Tribunal and High Court that the amount pertains to the building and not the land, thus allowing depreciation on it. Held that the payment was for construction of a business asset (Paras 1-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the amount of Rs. 36,96,516 paid for commercial use should be added to the cost of the building for depreciation.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the lower courts' decisions that the amount of Rs. 36,96,516 was correctly included in the cost of the building for depreciation purposes.

Law Points

  • Income Tax
  • Depreciation
  • Actual Cost
  • Commercial Use
  • Assessment Years
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

1998 LawText (SC) (05) 10

1998-05-06

Sujata V. Manohar, M. Jagannadha Rao

The Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi

M/s. Hindustan Times Ltd., New Delhi

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Income tax assessment dispute regarding depreciation claims.

Remedy Sought

The Revenue sought to disallow depreciation on the amount paid for commercial use.

Filing Reason

Dispute arose from the assessment years concerning the inclusion of costs for depreciation.

Previous Decisions

The Tribunal and High Court had previously allowed the depreciation claim.

Issues

Whether the amount paid for commercial use should be included in the cost of the building for depreciation.

Submissions/Arguments

The Revenue argued that the amount should be added to the cost of the land. The assessee contended that the amount was correctly added to the cost of the building.

Ratio Decidendi

The court clarified that the payment made for the additional construction of a business asset should be included in the cost of the building for depreciation, distinguishing it from costs associated with land.

Judgment Excerpts

The question basically is: Whether the assessee is entitled to depreciation in respect of a sum of Rs.36,96,516/- which it claimed as part of the actual cost of construction of a building constructed by it for business purposes. The payment has been made for construction of a business asset and forms a part of the cost incurred by the assessee in putting up that building.

Procedural History

The appeals were filed by the Revenue against the decisions of the Tribunal and High Court regarding the allowance of depreciation for the specified assessment years.

Acts & Sections

  • Income Tax Act, 1961: 256(2)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Upholds Conviction in Cheque Bounce Case Despite Vehicle Seizure Claim. Dishonour of Cheque Under Section 138 NI Act Stands as Liability Not Extinguished by Seizure of Collateral.
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Dismisses Petition for Regularization of Services Due to Delay and Laches — Petitioner Superannuated Without Regularization Despite Resolution. Writ of Mandamus Denied as Relief Became Infructuous After Superannuation.