Supreme Court Upholds Circulars Issued by State Bank of India Regarding Employee Participation in Elections — Validity Affirmed.

In Favour of Accused
  • 8
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose between the State Bank of India and its employees represented by the State Bank of India Staff Union regarding two Circulars issued by the bank on 28.1.1987 and 7.3.1987, which restricted employees from contesting elections to public bodies without prior permission. The appellants challenged a decision of the Andhra Pradesh High Court that set aside these Circulars, claiming they violated Section 9-A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The Circulars required employees to obtain permission and provide an undertaking that their election would not interfere with their bank duties. The respondents argued that these Circulars changed the conditions of service, which required notice under Section 9-A. The court analyzed whether the Circulars constituted a change in service conditions as defined in the Fourth Schedule of the Act. It concluded that participation in elections was not a customary privilege related to service conditions, and the existing rules already prohibited such participation without sanction. The court noted the need for the bank to maintain operational integrity and prevent political influence on its employees. The appeal was allowed, and the High Court's judgment was set aside, with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Labour Law - Change in Conditions of Service - Circulars do not violate Section 9-A - Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Section 9-A - The court held that the Circulars regarding employee participation in elections did not constitute a change in conditions of service as defined under Section 9-A, since participating in elections is not a customary privilege related to service conditions. The court emphasized that the existing rules already prohibited such participation without prior sanction, thus the Circulars were valid and did not require notice under Section 9-A (Paras 1-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Circulars issued by the State Bank of India violated Section 9-A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the Andhra Pradesh High Court's judgment, and upheld the validity of the Circulars issued by the State Bank of India.

Law Points

  • Industrial Disputes Act
  • 1947
  • Section 9-A
  • Conditions of Service
  • Circular Validity
  • Employee Conduct Regulations
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

1998 LawText (SC) (03) 50

1998-03-20

Sujata V. Manohar, D.P. Wadhwa

General Manager (Operations), State Bank of India & Ors.

State Bank of India Staff Union & Anr.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Challenge to the validity of Circulars issued by the State Bank of India.

Remedy Sought

Setting aside the judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High Court.

Filing Reason

The High Court ruled that the Circulars violated Section 9-A of the Industrial Disputes Act.

Previous Decisions

The High Court found the Circulars to be a change in conditions of service requiring notice.

Issues

Validity of Circulars under Section 9-A Change in conditions of service

Submissions/Arguments

The appellants argued that the Circulars did not change service conditions and were necessary for operational integrity. The respondents contended that the Circulars violated Section 9-A as they altered conditions of service.

Ratio Decidendi

The Circulars did not constitute a change in conditions of service as defined under Section 9-A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, since participation in elections was not a customary privilege related to service conditions.

Judgment Excerpts

The Circulars of 28.1.1987 and 7.3.1987, therefore, do not bring about any change in the conditions of service of a workman. Participating in an election to a Municipal Council or local body is not a customary privilege connected with conditions of service of work.

Procedural History

The appellants challenged the Andhra Pradesh High Court's decision which set aside the Circulars, leading to the appeal in the Supreme Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Industrial Disputes Act, 1947: Section 9-A
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute, Sets Aside Concurrent Findings for Non-Compliance of Order 7 Rule 3 CPC. Court Holds That Non-Filing of Plan/Sketch with Plaint Is Not Fatal If Encroachment Can Be Identified Through Other E...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Assistant Teachers' Petitions for Revised Pay Scales in Aided Schools. Teachers in Private Aided Schools Entitled to Same Pay Scales as Government Employees Under Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools Act, 1977.