Supreme Court Dismisses Transfer Petitions in Criminal and Domestic Violence Cases — No Ground Made Out for Transfer from Madurai to Bangalore. The Court held that the transfer petitions were bereft of merit and dismissed them without detailed findings to avoid affecting pending litigations under Section 406 CrPC and Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.

  • 54
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, S.M. Shoba, filed two transfer petitions under Section 406 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 read with Order XXXIX Rule 1 of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013. Transfer Petition (Crl.) No. 153 of 2021 sought transfer of Criminal Case C.C. No. 631 of 2014, titled Inspector of Police, All Women's Police Station, Madurai South vs. Saravanan Babu & Ors., pending before the Additional Magistrate of the Mahila Court, Madurai, Tamil Nadu, to a competent Judicial Magistrate Court at Bangalore, Karnataka. Transfer Petition (Crl.) No. 161 of 2021 sought transfer of Crl. M.P. No. 252 of 2014, titled S.M. Shoba vs. Saravanan Babu & Ors., under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, pending before the Judicial Magistrate Court (Mahila Court), Madurai, to a competent Judicial Magistrate Court at Bangalore. The Supreme Court heard the counsel for both parties at length. The Court observed that it would not be appropriate to deal with the respective arguments and record findings at this stage, as it might ultimately affect the parties and their pending litigations. On an overall conspectus of facts and circumstances, the Court found the transfer petitions to be bereft of merit and dismissed both petitions. The judgment was delivered by Justice Vikram Nath on June 15, 2022, at New Delhi.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Transfer of Cases - Section 406 CrPC - Transfer Petition - The petitioner sought transfer of criminal complaint and domestic violence proceedings from Madurai to Bangalore - The Supreme Court held that on overall conspectus of facts and circumstances, the transfer petitions were bereft of merit and dismissed them without recording detailed findings to avoid affecting pending litigations (Paras 4-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the criminal proceedings and domestic violence proceedings pending in Madurai should be transferred to Bangalore on the ground of convenience or any other valid reason.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Both Transfer Petitions (Crl.) No. 153/2021 and No. 161/2021 are dismissed as being bereft of merit.

Law Points

  • Transfer petition under Section 406 CrPC
  • Transfer of criminal proceedings
  • Transfer of domestic violence proceedings
  • Section 12 Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act
  • 2005
  • Order XXXIX Rule 1 Supreme Court Rules
  • 2013
  • Merits of transfer petition
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (SC) (6) 4

Transfer Petition(s)(Criminal) No(s). 153/2021 and 161/2021

2022-06-15

Vikram Nath

S.M. Shoba

The Inspector of Police & Ors. (in TP(Crl.) No. 153/2021); Saravanan Babu & Ors. (in TP(Crl.) No. 161/2021)

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Transfer petitions seeking transfer of criminal proceedings and domestic violence proceedings from Madurai to Bangalore.

Remedy Sought

Transfer of C.C. No. 631 of 2014 and Crl. M.P. No. 252 of 2014 from Madurai to Bangalore.

Filing Reason

Petitioner sought transfer of cases pending in Madurai to Bangalore, presumably for convenience or other reasons.

Issues

Whether the criminal proceedings in C.C. No. 631 of 2014 should be transferred from Madurai to Bangalore. Whether the domestic violence proceedings in Crl. M.P. No. 252 of 2014 should be transferred from Madurai to Bangalore.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued for transfer of cases from Madurai to Bangalore. Respondents opposed the transfer.

Ratio Decidendi

On an overall conspectus of facts and circumstances, the transfer petitions were found to be without merit and were dismissed. The Court refrained from detailed discussion to avoid affecting pending litigations.

Judgment Excerpts

In my opinion, it won’t be appropriate at this stage to deal with respective arguments and record findings, as it may ultimately affect the parties and their pending litigations. However, on an overall conspectus of facts and circumstances of the cases, the Transfer Petitions, being bereft of merit, are liable to be dismissed.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed two transfer petitions under Section 406 CrPC read with Order XXXIX Rule 1 of Supreme Court Rules, 2013. The first sought transfer of criminal proceedings C.C. No. 631 of 2014 from Madurai to Bangalore. The second sought transfer of domestic violence proceedings Crl. M.P. No. 252 of 2014 from Madurai to Bangalore. The Supreme Court heard the parties and dismissed both petitions on June 15, 2022.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 406
  • Supreme Court Rules, 2013: Order XXXIX Rule 1
  • Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005: 12
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows State Bank of India's Appeal Against MPID Act Attachment Order — Bank's Claim Over Property Prevails as Mortgage Was Prior to Default. Secured Creditor's Priority Under Section 31B of RDDBFI Act and Section 26E of SARFAESI ...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Transfer Petitions in Criminal and Domestic Violence Cases — No Ground Made Out for Transfer from Madurai to Bangalore. The Court held that the transfer petitions were bereft of merit and dismissed them without detailed find...