Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitration Award in Cooperative Society Dispute. The court found that the dispute was valid for arbitration under Section 55 of the Punjab Cooperative Societies Act, 1961, as the appellant was a member of the society involved.

  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved an appeal against a judgment by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana regarding the appointment of an arbitrator under the Punjab Cooperative Societies Act, 1961. The appellant, who was the petitioner in the High Court, challenged the appointment of the arbitrator on the grounds that the dispute was between an employee of one cooperative society and another cooperative society, which he argued was not covered under Section 55(1)(b) of the Act. The High Court had dismissed the writ petitions, following a precedent set in Mam Raj v. State of Haryana & Ors. The Supreme Court analyzed the applicability of the arbitration provisions, noting that the appellant was a member of the Shahbad Society, which was the other party in the dispute. The court found that the dispute pertained to the management and business of the Shahbad Society, thus falling within the scope of Section 55 of the Act. The court criticized the appellant for not disclosing his membership in the Shahbad Society in his special leave petition, which misrepresented the facts of the case. The court concluded that the dispute was valid for arbitration and dismissed the appeals with costs.

Headnote

A) Cooperative Societies Law - Arbitration Clause Applicability - Dispute between employee and society - Punjab Cooperative Societies Act, 1961, Section 55 - The court held that the dispute between the appellant, an employee of one society, and another society was subject to arbitration as the appellant was also a member of the latter society, thus falling within the purview of the Act. The court emphasized the importance of fair representation in presenting facts to the court (Paras 1-2).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the dispute between an employee of one cooperative society and another cooperative society could be referred to arbitration under the Punjab Cooperative Societies Act, 1961.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals with costs, affirming that the dispute fell within the purview of Section 55 of the Punjab Cooperative Societies Act, 1961.

Law Points

  • Arbitration under Cooperative Societies Act
  • Membership implications
  • Dispute management
  • Fair representation in court
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

1999 LawText (SC) (03) 47

1999-03-23

N.S. Hegde, D.P. Wadhwa

Balwant Singh

State of Haryana & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against the appointment of an arbitrator under the Punjab Cooperative Societies Act.

Remedy Sought

The appellant sought to challenge the appointment of the arbitrator.

Filing Reason

The appellant contended that the dispute was not arbitrable under the Act.

Previous Decisions

The High Court dismissed the writ petitions based on a precedent.

Issues

Applicability of arbitration provisions in cooperative society disputes Fair representation of facts in court

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued that the dispute was not covered under Section 55 of the Act. The respondent contended that the dispute was valid for arbitration as the appellant was a member of the Shahbad Society.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that membership in the cooperative society is crucial in determining the applicability of arbitration provisions under the Punjab Cooperative Societies Act, 1961.

Judgment Excerpts

The dispute squarely falls within Section 55 of the Act. It is unfortunate that the appellant in his special leave petition did not disclose this fact that he was a member of the Shahbad Society.

Procedural History

The appellant filed writ petitions in the High Court challenging the appointment of an arbitrator, which were dismissed, leading to the appeal in the Supreme Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Punjab Cooperative Societies Act: 55
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Complaint in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Stop Payment and Sufficient Funds. Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Not Attracted When Cheque Returned Unpaid for Stop Payment Instruction and Bank Confirms Suffi...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Income Tax Cases — Revenue's Stand Upheld. The court affirmed that leasing income does not constitute business income when the business has ceased.