Supreme Court Dismisses Special Leave Petition in Rent Control Case — Exemption Period Clarified. Citing the applicability of exemption under the Haryana Urban (Control of Rent & Eviction) Act, 1973, the court held that the exemption continues until the suit is adjudicated.

  • 15
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved a special leave petition filed by Tek Chand against Sat Narayan concerning the applicability of the Haryana Urban (Control of Rent & Eviction) Act, 1973. The dispute arose from a judgment and order of the Punjab and Haryana High Court dated 4th January 1988, in Regular Second Appeal No. 918 of 1987. The core legal issue was whether the exemption period under the Act continued until the suit was disposed of. The petitioner contended that the exemption should apply, while the respondent's counsel argued for the execution of the decree. The Supreme Court, referencing the precedent set in Atma Ram Mittal v. Ishwar Singh Punia, affirmed that the exemption would indeed apply for a period of ten years and remain effective until the suit's resolution. The court dismissed the special leave petition, indicating that if the petitioner did not file an undertaking within the stipulated time, the decree would be executable immediately. The decision clarified the conditions under which the exemption under the Rent Control Act operates and the implications for the execution of decrees in such cases.

Headnote

A) Rent Control Law - Applicability of Exemption - Exemption Period - Haryana Urban (Control of Rent & Eviction) Act, 1973, Sections 1(3), 13 - The exemption under the Act applies for a period of ten years and continues until the suit is disposed of or adjudicated. The court held that if the petitioner fails to file an undertaking, the decree shall become executable forthwith (Paras 121-122).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the exemption under the Haryana Urban (Control of Rent & Eviction) Act, 1973 continues until the suit is disposed of.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petition, affirming that the exemption under the Haryana Urban (Control of Rent & Eviction) Act, 1973 applies for ten years and continues until the suit is disposed of. The court ordered that if the petitioner fails to file an undertaking, the decree shall become executable forthwith.

Law Points

  • Applicability of Rent Control Act
  • Exemption period
  • Execution of decree
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

1989 LawText (SC) (09) 6

Special Leave Petition (C) No. 5628 of 1988

1989-09-14

Mukhaji, Sabyasachi, Venkataramiah, E.S., Singh, K.N., Natrajan, S.

1989 SCR Supl. (1) 121, JT 1989 (3) 740, 1989 SCALE (2) 668

P.P. Rao, Shakeel Ahmed, S.C. Maheshwari, P.K. Chakravarti, Ms. Sandhya Goswami, V.K. Bhardwaj

Tek Chand

Sat Narayan

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Special Leave Petition concerning rent control and eviction.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought to challenge the applicability of the Rent Control Act.

Filing Reason

Dispute over the execution of a decree under the Rent Control Act.

Previous Decisions

Punjab and Haryana High Court's order dated 4.1.1988 in Regular Second Appeal No. 918 of 1987.

Issues

Applicability of exemption under the Rent Control Act Conditions for execution of decree

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued for continued exemption under the Act. Respondent's counsel contended for immediate execution of the decree.

Ratio Decidendi

The court clarified that the exemption under the Haryana Urban (Control of Rent & Eviction) Act, 1973 remains effective until the suit is adjudicated, and failure to file an undertaking results in immediate execution of the decree.

Judgment Excerpts

The exemption would apply for a period of ten years and will continue to be available until suit is disposed of or adjudicated. If the petitioner fails to file an undertaking on usual terms, the decree shall become executable forthwith.

Procedural History

The case originated from a judgment and order of the Punjab and Haryana High Court dated 4.1.1988 in Regular Second Appeal No. 918 of 1987, leading to the filing of the special leave petition.

Acts & Sections

  • Haryana Urban (Control of Rent & Eviction) Act, 1973: 1(3), 13
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Dying Declaration — Appellant's Acquittal Sought on Grounds of Inconsistent Witness Testimony and Lack of Direct Evidence Dismissed.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Gram Panchayat Rights in Land Dispute — Central Act Declared Inoperative. Citing repugnancy, the Court ruled that the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1953 prevails over the Administration of Evacuee Property Act,...