Supreme Court Dismisses Petition for Separate Schools for Children of Prostitutes — Committee Formed for Further Examination. The court found that while separate schools and hostels were not warranted, adequate accommodation in reform homes was necessary for the welfare of children of prostitutes.

  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved a writ petition filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India by an advocate seeking directions for the establishment of separate schools and hostels for children of prostitutes. The respondents contended that these children, often unwanted, should be segregated from their mothers to integrate into society. The court, however, rejected the plea for separate facilities, emphasizing that children should not live in the undesirable conditions of their mothers' homes. The court recognized the need for reform and accommodation in hostels and reform homes to protect these children. It noted the increasing prevalence of prostitution and the necessity for effective measures to address the issue. Consequently, the court decided to form a committee comprising legal and social experts to investigate the matter and provide recommendations within eight weeks. The Ministry of Welfare was directed to allocate funds for the committee's expenses, and the case was scheduled for further hearing on January 16, 1990.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Public Interest Litigation - Separate Schools and Hostels - Request for separate schools and hostels for children of prostitutes rejected - Constitution of India, 1950, Article 32 - The court held that while separate facilities are not desirable, adequate accommodation in reform homes should be provided to segregate these children from their mothers. A committee was established to examine the issues and report back within eight weeks (Paras 174-175).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether separate schools and hostels should be established for children of prostitutes.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court rejected the petitioner's request for separate schools and hostels for children of prostitutes, emphasizing the need for adequate accommodation in reform homes instead. A committee was formed to investigate the issues and report back within eight weeks, with the Ministry of Welfare directed to provide funding for the committee's expenses.

Law Points

  • Public interest litigation
  • Article 32
  • segregation of children
  • welfare of children
  • committee recommendations
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

1989 LawText (SC) (11) 7

Writ Petition (Civil) No. 824 of 1988

1989-11-15

Misra, Rangnath Venkatachaliah, M.N., Sawant, P.B.

1990 AIR 292, 1989 SCR Supl. (2) 173, 1990 SCC Supl. 709, JT 1989 (4) 315, 1989 SCALE (2) 1126

V.C. Mahajan, Gaurav Jain, Ms. Abha Jain, Anil Dev Singh, I. Makwana, Rathin Das, K.R. Nambiar, Ms. A. Subhashini, A.M. Khanvilkar, A.S. Bhasme, R.K. Mehta, V. Krishnamurthy, S.K. Agnihotri, A.V. Rangam, Mahabir Singh, P.K. Pillai

Gaurav Jain

Union of India and Others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition for public interest litigation regarding the welfare of children of prostitutes.

Remedy Sought

Establishment of separate schools and hostels for children of prostitutes.

Filing Reason

To seek directions for the welfare and integration of children born to prostitutes.

Issues

Whether separate schools and hostels should be established for children of prostitutes. What measures should be taken for the welfare of children of prostitutes?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued for separate schools and hostels for children of prostitutes. Respondents contended that segregation from mothers is necessary for societal integration.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that while separate facilities for children of prostitutes were not warranted, it was essential to provide adequate accommodation in reform homes to protect these children from undesirable surroundings.

Judgment Excerpts

Children of prostitutes should not be permitted to live in inferno and the undesirable surroundings of prostitute homes. The Committee now set up will look into the problems and submit its report within 8 weeks.

Procedural History

The writ petition was filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India. Notice was issued to the original respondents and all States and Union Territories. The court heard arguments from both sides before forming a committee to investigate the issues.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 32
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Penalty Order in Customs Act Case for Denial of Cross-Examination. Violation of Natural Justice as Statements Under Section 108 of Customs Act, 1962 Used Without Opportunity to Cross-Examine Witnesses.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appellant in Sales Tax Refund Case Due to Incorrect Presumption of Tax Burden. Court Found Appellants Entitled to Refund for Three Years Prior to Writ Petition Filing.