Supreme Court Upholds Employee's Status in University Employment Dispute — Transfer Without Consent Invalid. The court ruled that an employee's contract cannot be unilaterally transferred without consent, affirming the respondent's continued employment.

In Favour of Accused
  • 5
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose between Jawaharlal Nehru University and Dr. K.S. Jawatkar regarding the transfer of the latter's employment to Manipur University following the merger of the Centre of Post-Graduate Studies at Imphal. The respondent, initially appointed as a temporary research assistant, accepted an offer for a position at the Centre, which was later upgraded to Assistant Professor. Following the decision to merge the Centre with Manipur University, the University resolved to transfer its faculty members, including the respondent, without their consent. The respondent challenged this transfer in the Delhi High Court, which ruled in his favor, stating that he could not be compelled to join the Manipur University and was entitled to continue his service until retirement. The Division Bench upheld this decision, emphasizing that the respondent's employment could not be automatically transferred without his consent. The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal by Jawaharlal Nehru University, affirming that the respondent remained an employee of the University and could not be retrenched as he had been adjusted to a suitable post during the litigation. The court reiterated the legal principle that no employee can be transferred from one employer to another without their consent, regardless of statutory provisions to the contrary.

Headnote

A) Employment Law - Transfer of Employment - Consent Requirement - Jawaharlal Nehru University Act, 1966, Section 7 - The court held that no employee can be transferred from one employer to another without their consent, whether express or implied. The respondent's employment with Jawaharlal Nehru University could not be converted to a contract with Manipur University without his agreement, thus affirming his continued employment with the appellant University (Paras 279H-280C).

B) Employment Law - Abolition of Post - Last Come First Go Principle - Jawaharlal Nehru University Act, 1966, Section 7 - The court noted that the transfer of the Centre could be seen as resulting in the abolition of the respondent's post. However, since he was adjusted against a suitable post during litigation, the University could not retrench him (Paras 280F-281A).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the respondent's services could be transferred from Jawaharlal Nehru University to Manipur University without his consent.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, affirming that the respondent remained an employee of Jawaharlal Nehru University and could not be retrenched as he had been adjusted to a suitable post during the litigation.

Law Points

  • Employment transfer
  • consent requirement
  • university jurisdiction
  • abolition of post
  • last come first go principle
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

1989 LawText (SC) (05) 8

Civil Appeal No. 2948 of 1984

1989-05-12

R.S. Pathak, Sabyasachi Mukharji

1989 AIR 1577, 1989 SCR (3) 273, 1989 SCC Supl. (1) 679, JT 1989 (2) 538, 1989 SCALE (1) 1438

G. Ramaswami, S.C. Dhanda, C.S. Vaidyanathan, P. Chowdhary, S.R. Sethia

Jawaharlal Nehru University

Dr. K.S. Jawatkar & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Dispute regarding the transfer of employment following the merger of a university centre.

Remedy Sought

The respondent sought to quash the resolution transferring his services to Manipur University.

Filing Reason

The respondent filed a writ petition challenging the transfer of his employment.

Previous Decisions

The Delhi High Court ruled in favor of the respondent, affirming his continued employment with Jawaharlal Nehru University.

Issues

Validity of employment transfer without consent Application of last come first go principle

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued that the respondent's employment was automatically transferred with the Centre. The respondent contended that his employment could not be transferred without his consent.

Ratio Decidendi

No employee can be transferred from one employer to another without their consent, whether express or implied. The contract of service remains with the original employer unless consent for transfer is given.

Judgment Excerpts

No employee can be transferred, without his consent, from one employer to another. The transfer of the Centre of Post-graduate Studies may be regarded as resulting in the abolition of the post held by the respondent.

Procedural History

The respondent filed a writ petition in the Delhi High Court, which was allowed. The Division Bench upheld this decision, leading to the appeal in the Supreme Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Jawaharlal Nehru University Act: Section 5(2), Section 7
  • Manipur University Act:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Defendant's Counter Claim Despite Limitation Concerns in Summary Suit — Limitation is a Mixed Question of Law and Fact Not to Be Decided on Affidavits
Related Judgement
High Court Karnataka High Court Sets Aside Order Restoring Ex-Parte Regular Appeal Filed by Defendant in Title Suit. Presumption of Service Under Section 27 of General Clauses Act, 1897 Stands Unrebutted as Power of Attorney Holder Lacked Personal Knowledge to ...