Supreme Court Allows Election Appeal, Sets Aside High Court's Decision. The election petitioner failed to prove that the election result was materially affected by the change of symbol under Section 100 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951.

In Favour of Accused
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from the 1985 Bihar Legislative Assembly elections where the appellant was declared elected from the 286 Chandan Kyari (S.C.) Constituency. The respondent, a sitting MLA, challenged the election results, claiming that a change in his election symbol from 'bow and arrow' to 'ladder' misled voters and materially affected his chances of winning. The respondent argued that he did not receive adequate time for campaigning due to this change, violating Section 30(d) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, and Rule 10(5) of the Conduct of Election Rules, 1961. The High Court initially ruled in favor of the respondent, declaring the election void. However, the Supreme Court found that the respondent failed to prove that the election result was materially affected by the symbol change. The court noted that the respondent lost by a margin of 430 votes and did not provide evidence that more than 430 voters would have voted for him had the symbol not changed. The court emphasized that mere assertions were insufficient and that the burden of proof lay with the election petitioner. Ultimately, the Supreme Court set aside the High Court's decision, allowing the appeal and reinstating the election results in favor of the appellant.

Headnote

A) Election Law - Election Petition - Burden of Proof - Representation of the People Act, 1951, Section 100 - The election petitioner must prove that the election result was materially affected by violations of election rules. The court held that the petitioner failed to provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate that the change of symbol materially affected the election outcome. (Paras 931-934).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the election result was materially affected by the change of election symbol and violations of election rules.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the High Court's judgment, and reinstated the election results in favor of the appellant, awarding costs of Rs. 3,000.

Law Points

  • Election petition
  • burden of proof
  • violation of election rules
  • material effect on election result
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

1989 LawText (SC) (08) 32

Civil Appeal No. 3955 (NCE) of 1987

1989-08-22

Saikia, K.N., Ojha, N.D.

1990 AIR 19, 1989 SCR (3) 921, 1989 SCC (4) 773, JT 1989 (3) 470, 1989 SCALE (2) 355

R.K. Garg, D.K. Garg, S.N. Singh, H.L. Srivastava, B.M. Sharma, T.N. Singh

Smt. Lata Devi (Mali)

Haru Rajwar

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Election petition challenging the validity of election results.

Remedy Sought

The respondent sought to declare the election void.

Filing Reason

Claim of misleading voters due to change of election symbol.

Previous Decisions

High Court declared the election void based on violation of election rules.

Issues

Whether the election result was materially affected by the change of symbol Whether the election petitioner proved the alleged violations of election rules

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued that there was no breach of election rules and the respondent failed to prove material effect. The respondent contended that the change of symbol misled voters and affected the election outcome.

Ratio Decidendi

The election petitioner must provide satisfactory evidence to prove that the election result was materially affected by any alleged violations of election rules.

Judgment Excerpts

The election petitioner must prove that the election result was materially affected by violations of election rules. The burden of proof lies with the election petitioner.

Procedural History

The respondent filed an election petition in the Patna High Court challenging the election results, which was allowed, declaring the election void. The appellant appealed to the Supreme Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Representation of the People Act, 1951: 30, 100
  • Conduct of Election Rules, 1961: 10
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Loan Dispute — Upholds Award of Rs.51 Crores with Interest. Facility Agreement and Guarantee Enforced; No Grounds for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation A...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Witness Testimony and Lack of Homicidal Death Proof. Acquittal of Son, Wife, and Relatives for Murder of Deceased Trimbak Rasal Upheld as Prosecution Failed t...