Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue Appeals on Excise Duty Exemption for Drug Intermediate. The court found that Acetic Anhydride, supplied as a drug intermediate, is entitled to exemption under the relevant notifications.

  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose between the Collector of Central Excise, Guntur and Andhra Sugar Ltd. regarding the excise duty on Acetic Anhydride, which the respondent claimed was exempt as it was supplied to drug manufacturers. The respondent filed two refund claims for excise duty paid during the period from February 5, 1981, to February 26, 1982, asserting that the goods were exempt under Notification No. 55/75 CE and Notification No. 62/78 CE, as Acetic Anhydride is a drug intermediate. Initially, the Assistant Collector of Central Excise allowed the refund claims, but the department appealed, leading to the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals) annulling the refund orders. The Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal later ruled in favor of the respondent, prompting the Revenue to appeal to the Supreme Court under Section 35L(b) of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. The Supreme Court examined whether Acetic Anhydride, when supplied to drug manufacturers, qualified for exemption under the notifications. The court emphasized that the term 'drug intermediate' should be interpreted broadly, considering the purpose of the goods' use. The court referenced previous cases and concluded that the Tribunal's decision was correct, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue's appeals without costs.

Headnote

A) Excise Duty - Exemption for Drug Intermediate - Acetic Anhydride qualifies for exemption under Notification No. 55/75 CE - The court held that Acetic Anhydride, when supplied as a drug intermediate to drug manufacturers, is entitled to exemption from excise duty as per the relevant notifications. The interpretation of 'drug intermediate' was found to be wide and applicable in this context. (Paras 546-547).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether Acetic Anhydride manufactured by the respondent is eligible for exemption from excise duty as a drug intermediate under the relevant notifications.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals of the Revenue, affirming the Tribunal's decision that Acetic Anhydride is entitled to exemption as a drug intermediate under the relevant notifications.

Law Points

  • Statutory interpretation
  • Excise duty exemption
  • Drug intermediate definition
  • Notification interpretation
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

1988 LawText (SC) (10) 4

Civil Appeal Nos. 1568-69 (NM) of 1988

1988-10-26

Sabyasachi Mukharji

1989 AIR 625, 1988 SCR Supl. (3) 543, 1989 SCC Supl. (1) 144, JT 1988 (4) 410, 1988 SCALE (2) 1323

C. G. Ramaswamy, Indu Malhotra, Sushma Suri

Collector of Central Excise, Guntur

Andhra Sugar Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Dispute over excise duty exemption for Acetic Anhydride.

Remedy Sought

Refund of excise duty paid on Acetic Anhydride.

Filing Reason

Claim of exemption under relevant notifications.

Previous Decisions

Assistant Collector allowed refund, later annulled by Collector (Appeals).

Issues

Eligibility of Acetic Anhydride for excise duty exemption Interpretation of 'drug intermediate' under notifications

Submissions/Arguments

The respondent argued that Acetic Anhydride is a drug intermediate and exempt from duty. The appellant contended that the exemption does not apply as per the notifications.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that Acetic Anhydride, when supplied as a drug intermediate, qualifies for exemption from excise duty, emphasizing the broad interpretation of the term 'drug intermediate' in the context of the notifications.

Judgment Excerpts

Acetic Anhydride is a chemical but when it is supplied as a drug intermediate to a drug manufacturer, it would be entitled to exemption under the relevant Notification. The expression 'drug intermediate' is of a wide description and substance and must be so interpreted.

Procedural History

The Assistant Collector allowed refund claims, which were annulled by the Collector (Appeals). The Tribunal later ruled in favor of the respondent, leading to the Revenue's appeal to the Supreme Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944: 11B(2), 35L(b)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Wife's Appeal Against Judicial Separation Decree in Hindu Marriage Act Case — Cruelty Not Established. Husband's Petition Under Section 10 and 13(1)(i-a) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Dismissed as Allegations of Mental Cruelt...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Gujarat Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Succession Dispute Over Ashram Property — Allegations of Criminal Breach of Trust and Criminal Intimidation Found to Be Civil in Nature. Dispute over Will and Succession to Mahant's Ashram and V...