Supreme Court Allows Legal Representatives to Continue Pre-emption Suit Due to Heritability of Rights. Court Overrules Previous High Court Decision Declaring Pre-emption Rights Non-heritable Under Section 15 of the Punjab Pre-emption Act, 1913.

In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from a pre-emption suit filed by Kishan Chand, a tenant, against the sale of property he occupied. The property was sold to the respondent, leading Kishan Chand to claim a right of pre-emption based on local customary law. The respondent contested the existence of such a right and argued that it was personal and not heritable. After Kishan Chand's death, his legal representatives sought to continue the suit, but the respondent opposed this, claiming the right to sue did not survive. The trial court initially allowed the application to substitute the legal representatives, but the High Court reversed this decision, citing a Full Bench ruling that deemed the statutory right of pre-emption non-heritable. The Supreme Court, however, found that the right of tenancy was heritable and thus the right of pre-emption, being incidental to it, was also heritable. The court overruled the High Court's decision, reinstated the trial court's order, and directed that the legal representatives be allowed to continue the suit. The court emphasized that the death of the pre-emptor during proceedings did not extinguish the right to sue. The appeal was allowed, restoring the trial court's order. The court also referenced previous cases to support its reasoning.

Headnote

A) Property Law - Pre-emption Rights - Heritability of Pre-emption Rights - Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 22 Rule 3 - The court held that the right of pre-emption, although not an interest in property, is heritable as it is attached to the right of tenancy, which is heritable. The legal representatives of the deceased tenant were entitled to continue the suit for pre-emption. (Paras 900-902)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the right of pre-emption conferred on a tenant by customary law is heritable and whether the legal representatives of a deceased tenant can continue the suit.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, reinstated the trial court's order, and directed that the legal representatives be brought on record to continue the suit.

Law Points

  • Heritable rights
  • Pre-emption
  • Customary law
  • Civil Procedure Code
  • 1908
  • Order 22 Rule 3
  • Punjab Pre-emption Act
  • 1913
  • Right to sue
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

1988 LawText (SC) (02) 28

Civil Appeal No. 453 of 1988

1988-02-08

Venkataramiah, E.S., Ojha, N.D.

1988 AIR 726, 1988 SCR (2) 895, 1988 SCC (2) 109

E.C. Agarwala, G.K. Bansal

Kanta Rani C Kanti Devi & Anr.

Rama Rani

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Pre-emption suit regarding the sale of property occupied by a tenant.

Remedy Sought

Legal representatives sought to continue the pre-emption suit.

Filing Reason

Claim of right to pre-emption based on customary law.

Previous Decisions

High Court ruled the right of pre-emption was not heritable, contrary to trial court's decision.

Issues

Whether the right of pre-emption conferred on a tenant by customary law is heritable. Whether the legal representatives of a deceased tenant can continue the suit.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants argued that the right of pre-emption is heritable as it is attached to the right of tenancy. Respondent contended that the right of pre-emption is personal and does not survive after the tenant's death.

Ratio Decidendi

The right of pre-emption, while not an interest in property, is heritable as it is incidental to the heritable right of tenancy.

Judgment Excerpts

While a right of pre-emption does not give right to an interest in immovable property, the right of tenancy itself was heritable. The right to sue therefore survived on the death of the plaintiff-tenant in favour of the appellants.

Procedural History

The trial court allowed the application to substitute legal representatives; the High Court reversed this decision, leading to the appeal in the Supreme Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Civil Procedure Code, 1908: Order 22 Rule 3
  • Punjab Pre-emption Act, 1913: Section 15
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Returned Candidate in Election Petition Under Section 123(4) of Representation of the People Act, 1951 Due to Political Criticism Not Amounting to Corrupt Practice. False Statements Allegedly Made in Election Pamphlets Did Not B...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Promotion of Chief Town Planner — Upholds High Court's Decision. The court found that the U.P. Government Servants Seniority Rules, 1991, take precedence over the Centralised Services Rules, determining the se...