Supreme Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Sales Tax on Bread and Biscuits — Upholds Legislative Authority on Taxation. Citing the economic wisdom of tax as a legislative domain, the court found no violation of constitutional rights.

  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved a series of writ petitions filed by various bakeries challenging the imposition of sales tax and surcharge on bread, rusk, and bun under the Andhra Pradesh Sales Tax Act, 1957. The petitioners contended that bread and biscuits constituted a homogeneous class and should not be subjected to different tax rates as per Schedule I, Item Nos. 117 and 129 of the Act. They argued that the differential treatment violated Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution, which guarantees the right to practice any profession or carry on any occupation, trade, or business. The court analyzed the arguments presented, including references to previous judgments, and concluded that the economic wisdom of tax is a matter for the legislature, not the judiciary. The court found rationality in the legislature's decision regarding tax imposition, stating that the capacity to pay tax generally increases with receipts. Consequently, the court dismissed the writ petitions, affirming that the challenge under Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) was not sustainable and that the imposition of sales tax was valid. The court ordered that there would be no costs and vacated any interim orders previously in place.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Sales Tax Imposition - Different rates for bread and biscuits - Constitution of India, 1950, Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) - Petitioners challenged the imposition of sales tax on bread and biscuits, claiming they belong to a homogeneous class and should not be taxed differently. The court held that the economic wisdom of tax is within the legislature's domain and found no violation of Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) (Paras 9D-F).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the imposition of different sales tax rates on bread and biscuits is constitutionally valid.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court dismissed the writ petitions, affirming the validity of the sales tax imposition on bread and biscuits under the Andhra Pradesh Sales Tax Act, 1957, and held that the challenge under Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) was not sustainable.

Law Points

  • Constitutional validity
  • Sales tax
  • Homogeneous class
  • Article 14
  • Article 19(1)(g)
  • Legislative domain
  • Economic wisdom of tax
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

1987 LawText (SC) (11) 31

Writ Petitions (Civil) Nos. 5117/81, 7340/81, 3656-84/82, 6381-82, 6951-52/82, 8010-19/82, 8108-11/82, 9019-20/82, 5241-60/83, 1734-35/83 and 559-560/83

1987-11-24

Sabyasachi Mukharji

1988 AIR 322, 1988 SCR (2) 7, 1987 SCC Supl. 440, JT 1987 (4) 515, 1987 SCALE (2) 1187

B. Kanta Rao, C. Seetharamiah, T.V.S.N. Chari, Ms. Vrinda Grover, Ch. Badri Nath, A.K. Sanghi, G.S. Chatterjee, P.N. Mishra, A.V Rangam, Pramod Swarup, D. Goburdhan, M.N. Shroff

Sadiq Bakery etc.

State of A P & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions challenging the imposition of sales tax on bread and biscuits.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought to declare the sales tax imposition illegal.

Filing Reason

Claimed that bread and biscuits are a homogeneous class and should not be taxed differently.

Previous Decisions

Previous decisions cited did not support the petitioners' contention.

Issues

Constitutional validity of differential sales tax rates Legislative authority over taxation

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that bread and biscuits belong to the same class and should not be taxed differently. Petitioners contended that the multiple point tax violates Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.

Ratio Decidendi

The economic wisdom of a tax is within the exclusive domain of the legislature, and the court found rationality in the imposition of different tax rates based on the capacity to pay.

Judgment Excerpts

The economic wisdom of a tax or lack of it are within the exclusive domain of the legislature. The challenge to the imposition under Article 14 as well as Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution is not sustainable.

Procedural History

The court heard multiple writ petitions challenging the sales tax imposition and delivered a consolidated judgment.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Articles 14, 19(1)(g)
  • Andhra Pradesh Sales Tax Act: Schedule I, Item Nos. 117, 129
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Pension Arrears to Retired Bank Employee Despite Employer's Delay in Remitting Contribution. Employer's Obligation to Forward Pension Papers Cannot Be Withheld Due to Disciplinary Proceedings; Para 5(2) of Pension Scheme Held Ult...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Tenant Appeals in Delhi Rent Control Act Case — Clarifies Grounds for Eviction.