Supreme Court Clarifies Recruitment Process for Administrative Tribunals — Upholds Eligibility of Advocates. The court upheld the necessity of a High Powered Selection Committee for appointments to the Administrative Tribunal and confirmed that advocates qualified as Judges of the High Court are eligible for such positions.

  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved review petitions concerning the recruitment process for the Administrative Tribunals under the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985. The Attorney General sought clarification on observations made in previous judgments regarding the appointment of the Chairman, Vice-Chairman, and Members of the Administrative Tribunal. The court considered the appropriate recruitment process, concluding that a High Powered Selection Committee should be established for both Central and State Administrative Tribunals, with specific leadership roles assigned to sitting judges. The court also addressed the eligibility of advocates qualified to be Judges of the High Court for the position of Vice-Chairman, rejecting the argument that they lack necessary administrative experience. The court emphasized that such advocates are inherently qualified for both judicial and administrative duties, and their administrative capabilities could be evaluated during the selection process. The court granted extensions for setting up additional benches and for legislative actions to implement its observations. The Review Petitions were ultimately disposed of without interference in the earlier observations made by the Chief Justice.

Headnote

A) Administrative Law - Recruitment to Administrative Tribunals - High Powered Selection Committee - Recruitment to the Central Administrative Tribunal should be conducted by a High Powered Selection Committee headed by a sitting Judge of the Supreme Court, while for State Administrative Tribunals, it should be headed by a sitting Judge of the High Court. The court clarified the recruitment process to ensure proper oversight and selection (Paras 234G-235A).

B) Administrative Law - Eligibility of Advocates - Advocates qualified to be Judges of the High Court are eligible for appointment as Vice-Chairman or Members of the Administrative Tribunal. The court held that such advocates possess the necessary qualifications to perform both judicial and administrative functions, and their administrative potential can be assessed during the selection process (Paras 235B-D).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether advocates qualified to be Judges of the High Court can be appointed as Vice-Chairman or Members of the Administrative Tribunal and the appropriate recruitment process.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court clarified that a High Powered Selection Committee should be established for recruitment to the Administrative Tribunals, and advocates qualified to be Judges of the High Court are eligible for appointment as Vice-Chairman or Members. The court granted extensions for legislative actions and setting up additional benches.

Law Points

  • Administrative Tribunals Act
  • 1985
  • Recruitment process
  • High Powered Selection Committee
  • Eligibility criteria for Vice-Chairman
  • Administrative experience
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

1987 LawText (SC) (05) 13

Review Petition Nos. 520.23 of 1987

1987-05-05

R.S. Pathak, Ranganath Misra, G.L. Oza, M.M. Dutt

1987 SCR (3) 233, 1987 SCC Supl. 734, JT 1987 (2) 626, 1987 SCALE (1) 1317

K. Parasaran, Ms. A. Subhashini, P.H. Parekh, Suhail Dutt, P.D. Sharma, R. Ramachandran

S.P. Sampath Kumar

Union of India & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Review petitions regarding the recruitment process for Administrative Tribunals.

Remedy Sought

Clarification of observations made in previous judgments.

Filing Reason

To resolve conflicts in judicial observations regarding the appointment process.

Previous Decisions

Judgments delivered on December 9, 1986, concerning the vires of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985.

Issues

Eligibility of advocates for appointment as Vice-Chairman or Members of the Administrative Tribunal Appropriate recruitment process for Administrative Tribunals

Submissions/Arguments

The Attorney General argued for clarification on recruitment processes and eligibility criteria. Concerns were raised about the administrative experience of advocates.

Ratio Decidendi

The court established that the recruitment process for Administrative Tribunals must involve a High Powered Selection Committee, and advocates qualified as Judges possess the necessary qualifications for administrative roles.

Judgment Excerpts

In the case of recruitment to the Central Administrative Tribunal the appropriate course would be to appoint a High Powered Selection Committee headed by a sitting Judge of the Supreme Court. An advocate who is qualified to be a Judge of the High Court is an advocate who by implication is qualified to perform not only the judicial duties but the administrative functions.

Procedural History

The court reviewed petitions filed to clarify previous judgments regarding the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, and addressed the recruitment process and eligibility criteria.

Acts & Sections

  • Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition for Minor Girl, Directs Counselling and Custody to Father. Father's petition alleging illegal detention of minor daughter by alleged husband leads to court ordering counselling and directing father to a...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Grants Bail to MCOCA Accused Due to Lack of Evidence of Membership in Organized Crime Syndicate. Single Incident of Assault Not Sufficient to Attract Section 3(4) of Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999.